Supercharging a 'Vert - MustangForums.com


2005-2014 Mustangs Discussions on the latest S197 model Mustangs from Ford.

Reply
 
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-30-2011, 09:53 PM   #1
LaserGT
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Illinois
Posts: 321
Question Supercharging a 'Vert

I picked up an issue of MM & FF tonight and I saw an ad for the new Paxton S/C. It claims that it produces 600 hp at the flywheel at only 8 pounds of boost. Well that gets me to start dreaming. My question is, what would I need to do to reinforce the chassis for that much additional power?
LaserGT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2011, 10:58 PM   #2
onederful100
6th Gear Member
 
onederful100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 6,128
Default

you dont need to reinforce anything.
but if you are worried about body twisting, you can add subframe connectors and a roll cage.
but a roll cage isn't too street friendly. but depends on the # of points on the cage.
but if you want to add the SC, you can do that without anything else.
onederful100 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2011, 11:57 PM   #3
daredevil95
4th Gear Member
 
daredevil95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: CT
Posts: 1,461
Default

The vert's frame are pretty strong to begin with, you wouldn't have to do anything to beef up the frame. If you plan on taking it down the track, most tracks will insist on a roll cage for any verts running 13.50 and faster, which you are probably already at or faster. Research different types of centrifugal and whipple type superchargers, you may prefer a whipple type after doing some research. There are a ton options for supercharging. Good luck.
daredevil95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2011, 12:07 AM   #4
LaserGT
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Illinois
Posts: 321
Default

If I were to drive it that hard where I'd cause body twist then I'd better park the Stang. Thanks for the info, that's good to know I don't have to do anything with the chassis if I get more power.
LaserGT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2011, 12:17 AM   #5
LaserGT
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Illinois
Posts: 321
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by daredevil95 View Post
The vert's frame are pretty strong to begin with, you wouldn't have to do anything to beef up the frame. If you plan on taking it down the track, most tracks will insist on a roll cage for any verts running 13.50 and faster, which you are probably already at or faster. Research different types of centrifugal and whipple type superchargers, you may prefer a whipple type after doing some research. There are a ton options for supercharging. Good luck.
Thanks. I wouldn't take it to the track but I'd just want to have more power under the hood (like who of us wouldn't). But is there a big difference between the centrifugal and whipple type S/C when it comes to the boost and when it kicks in? You'll have to excuse me because I'm a noob when it comes to superchargers.
LaserGT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2011, 12:29 AM   #6
danzcool
4th Gear Member
 
danzcool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: CA
Posts: 1,811
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LaserGT View Post
...But is there a big difference between the centrifugal and whipple type S/C when it comes to the boost and when it kicks in? You'll have to excuse me because I'm a noob when it comes to superchargers.
Oh yeah.
Twin screw and TVS style superchargers have loads of torque at lower RPMs, but the centifugals have more power at high RPMs, so at 3000RPMs the whipple will have more power, at 6000RPMs the centrifugal will have more power, not sure where they tend to cross over though.
danzcool is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2011, 12:42 AM   #7
LaserGT
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Illinois
Posts: 321
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by danzcool View Post
Oh yeah.
Twin screw and TVS style superchargers have loads of torque at lower RPMs, but the centifugals have more power at high RPMs, so at 3000RPMs the whipple will have more power, at 6000RPMs the centrifugal will have more power, not sure where they tend to cross over though.
That's REALLY good to know. I'm looking more for the power to come in at the low end so it looks like the whipple type is the way I want to go. Thanks to everyone for their input, it's been really helpful.
LaserGT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2011, 02:35 AM   #8
danzcool
4th Gear Member
 
danzcool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: CA
Posts: 1,811
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LaserGT View Post
That's REALLY good to know. I'm looking more for the power to come in at the low end so it looks like the whipple type is the way I want to go. Thanks to everyone for their input, it's been really helpful.
Of course, I know a guy who used a centrifugal and sprayed nitrous oxide at lower RPMs to overcome that issue... but that's getting a bit complex.
danzcool is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Hot Lap: 2015 Roush RS3 Test + Build a Supercharger! - AmericanMuscle.com AMAlexLazarus AmericanMuscle.com 0 10-01-2015 10:21 AM
4 Valve Head questions GimpyHSHS 4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang 6 10-01-2015 10:01 AM
ranger blower col2560 V6 (1994-2004) Mustangs 3 09-25-2015 09:59 PM


Tags
10s, 12s, 19, 2011, 2012, blue, convertible, ford, gt, kona, lustre, mustang, nickel, package, painted, pony, premium, v6, vert

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:15 PM.