mustang vs T/A part 2
#12
mustang vs T/A part 2
hey ohsoquik02 did you read this part??? "oh and we are up in colorado 5000+ ft above sea level" thats why there times are higher, yeah down at sea level they would run the times you said<edited><editID>mustang30240</editID><editDate>38014.6724074074</editDate></edited>
#14
mustang vs T/A part 2
Originally Posted by mustang30240
hey ohsoquik02 did you read this part??? "oh and we are up in colorado 5000+ ft above sea level" thats why there times are higher, yeah down at sea level they would run the times you said
I dont know... a modded LT1 not even hitting 13s .. thats just some s**tty driving I dont care at what sea level lol <IMG src=smileys/smiley4.gif border="0"> </P>
#15
mustang vs T/A part 2
Elevation is MURDER on normally aspirated engines.
combine elevation with a bad tank of gas and my truck barely ran up there. I had to use 4-low to get out of the parking lot with the trailer. yikes.
Personally at altitude if you had to go with either h/i/c OR forced induction, I'd go for the forced air first. Even with h/i/c a normally aspirated engine is going to be gasping for air, but compress the air and you don't notice the altitude hardly at all.
combine elevation with a bad tank of gas and my truck barely ran up there. I had to use 4-low to get out of the parking lot with the trailer. yikes.
Personally at altitude if you had to go with either h/i/c OR forced induction, I'd go for the forced air first. Even with h/i/c a normally aspirated engine is going to be gasping for air, but compress the air and you don't notice the altitude hardly at all.
#16
mustang vs T/A part 2
Maybe get aftermarket heads cam intake.I used to race this ram air firechichicken on the way home from work occasionally when wed line up at a red light and beat him with just that plus full exhaust 3.55's and t-5 on a 302.That is untill he got tired of it and got some nitrous.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post