Classic Mustangs (Tech) Technical discussions about the Mustangs of yester-year.

how about them 289s?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-17-2006, 08:36 PM
  #21  
Hornblower
I ♥ Acer
 
Hornblower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 148
Default RE: how about them 289s?

The 289 has shorter rods than the 302 allowing it to wind up faster. I'm not sure what the controversy is here. The 289 was only produced for a few years, and the 302 was put into thousands of Ford cars so is readily available at any junk yard.
Hornblower is offline  
Old 11-17-2006, 08:49 PM
  #22  
ckw1969
 
ckw1969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 23
Default RE: how about them 289s?

the 289 is a good engine but u have to do so much to them to make them real fast it is not worth it u can spend the same money on a 351 and be a lot faster .u can run the 289 rods with a 302 crank and 302 pistons in a early block and gain some power this is called a lond rod 302 and u can turn your pistons around backwards and it will raise the pistons up in the block to gain some more compression.this only works with flat top or dished pistons because thethe 289 heads pin location is off centered.if u know what your are doing u can combine the two engines and gain some cheep performance.the 289 heads are a great up grade to a 302 they have a 55 cc chamber to gain compression u would need to put some larger valves and some port work and they ill out perform a lot of after market heads
ckw1969 is offline  
Old 11-17-2006, 09:06 PM
  #23  
Hornblower
I ♥ Acer
 
Hornblower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 148
Default RE: how about them 289s?

Here is some info you guys may want to injest.
http://www.fordmuscle.com/archives/2...ker/index2.php
Hornblower is offline  
Old 11-17-2006, 09:15 PM
  #24  
ckw1969
 
ckw1969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 23
Default RE: how about them 289s?

thanks for that.
ckw1969 is offline  
Old 11-17-2006, 10:08 PM
  #25  
paddy187
4th Gear Member
 
paddy187's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Eke, Belgium
Posts: 1,264
Default RE: how about them 289s?

man we are in the classic section and we get the fox guys now, i hate the fox body is such an ugly car it like an escort on steroids...i also don't like any mustang past 66. Why some people want to take a hipo and put it in fox is beyond me.....if you have a orginal hipo restore it the fox ain't a classic and imo never will be so take a 302 and leave the 289 were they belong.... ps i have a 65 with a 302 in...pot kettle black rearange might be appropriate
paddy187 is offline  
Old 11-17-2006, 10:58 PM
  #26  
ModularFox
Banned
Thread Starter
 
ModularFox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,227
Default RE: how about them 289s?

dont be mad because the classic granny cars cant keep up with the fox's
ModularFox is offline  
Old 11-17-2006, 11:02 PM
  #27  
Soaring
I ♥ Acer
 
Soaring's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location:
Posts: 17,565
Default RE: how about them 289s?

The classic mustangs drip over into the Fox bodies because that is just the history.
Even though they are weak, they are still our little brother.
Soaring is offline  
Old 11-17-2006, 11:16 PM
  #28  
ModularFox
Banned
Thread Starter
 
ModularFox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,227
Default RE: how about them 289s?

i wasnt serious. i love all mustangs especially the old ones. even though some people hate fox's but to each their own everyone has their opinion, but when it comes down to it their ALL mustangs
ModularFox is offline  
Old 11-17-2006, 11:50 PM
  #29  
Bulldog66
3rd Gear Member
 
Bulldog66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location:
Posts: 537
Default RE: how about them 289s?

eh, I dig the 289 because its year specific and a fun motor to build. I may not break any land speed records but it's sure fun to tear the asphalt up between the stop lights in town.

Bulldog66 is offline  
Old 11-18-2006, 02:41 AM
  #30  
Brandontyler65
I ♥ Acer
 
Brandontyler65's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,845
Default RE: how about them 289s?

well if you wanna make some cool make a 289 Clevor engine
Brandontyler65 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
uberstang1
4.6L General Discussion
67
12-07-2017 07:10 AM
GTJIM
New Member Area
7
09-23-2015 09:59 AM
ryland
Mustang News, Concepts, Rumors & Discussion
0
09-13-2015 12:35 PM
Brian Emmer
Classic Mustangs (Tech)
11
09-09-2015 02:50 PM
ding56
Classic Mustangs (Tech)
3
08-14-2015 02:40 AM



Quick Reply: how about them 289s?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:06 AM.