5 Reasons a Solid Rear Axle Mustang is STILL Superior (5 Reasons It’s Definitely NOT)

5 Reasons a Solid Rear Axle Mustang is STILL Superior (5 Reasons It’s Definitely NOT)

By -

5. Solid: Lighter

2001 Ford Mustang Bullitt GT

If you’re comparing two Mustangs of the same size and year, a solid rear axle assembly is going to be lighter than the IRS. Look at ’99-’04 Cobras. With the IRS setup, you’re looking at roughly 80 extra pounds compared to the Mustang GT/Bullitt/Mach 1 of that era. The same is true when the entire Mustang lineup shifted to IRS between the 2014 and 2015 model years. Weight is the enemy of performance.

Image Credit: Ford Motor Company

Michael S. Palmer began his career assisting and developing content for Academy Award-winning and studio-based film and television producers. He has been a professional writer since 2008, when he joined the Writers Guild of America West (WGAw). As a journalist and Content Editor/Manager, he has covered numerous emerging imaging, theatrical exhibition, home entertainment, and automotive technologies. He currently spends his days creating original content at the Internet Brands Automotive Group for some of the world's largest online automotive communities, including Ford Truck Enthusiasts, CorvetteForum, ClubLexus, AudiWorld, and LS1Tech. He still owns his first car, a 1987 Mercury Cougar; adores driving his Boss 302 Mustang; and recently teamed with Chevrolet Performance, Holley, Magnaflow, Eaton, Wilwood, Michelin, Chemical Guys, Summit Racing to build his first project car. Installing an LS3 E-ROD Connect & Cruise system into a 1992 Buick Roadmaster Estate Wagon made his eight-passenger wagon faster than a C5 Corvette to 60mph and 50 state emissions legal. His wife and daughter are very patient.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:42 AM.