2007 models slower than 2005/2006 mustangs
02-20-2007, 04:59 PM
#15
3rd Gear Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 770
RE: 2007 models slower than 2005/2006 mustangs
if some of you guys got charged a gas guzzler tax you might want to double check your paperwork...
unless there is some state gas guzzler tax you got hit with, you got robbed!
i went to fordvehicles.com and the mpg ratings are the same as every other year and there was no GG tax listed anywhere!
unless there is some state gas guzzler tax you got hit with, you got robbed!
i went to fordvehicles.com and the mpg ratings are the same as every other year and there was no GG tax listed anywhere!
ORIGINAL: MartyMoose
My '07 came complete with the Gas Guzzler tax. [:'(]
My '07 came complete with the Gas Guzzler tax. [:'(]
02-20-2007, 05:43 PM
#16
3rd Gear Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: WA
Posts: 840
RE: 2007 models slower than 2005/2006 mustangs
[sm=imsorry.gif]Well, I'm glad to announce that I was totally wrong for posting that I had to pay the GG tax!!
I don't know what I was thinking. Maybe I saw it on one of those window stickers for the GT500 posted on the Internet????
Well, yeah I feel kinda dumb. But I feelgood that I know I didn't pay for GG. It's kind of a wash though. [&:]
I guess we can now put that one to bed.
I don't know what I was thinking. Maybe I saw it on one of those window stickers for the GT500 posted on the Internet????
Well, yeah I feel kinda dumb. But I feelgood that I know I didn't pay for GG. It's kind of a wash though. [&:]
plus, no gas guzzler tax!!!
02-20-2007, 05:57 PM
#17
4th Gear Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,157
RE: 2007 models slower than 2005/2006 mustangs
umm....i'd love to really see this. And way slower...i doubt it. It's called get a 07 that has no motorized seats or heated seats there's a few pounds there and get 17" rims.
02-20-2007, 06:00 PM
#18
2nd Gear Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location:
Posts: 467
RE: 2007 models slower than 2005/2006 mustangs
if you chose to get the slower gears in the 07 it is slower. but since it is an option to get the same gears, those who did have pretty much the same performance. no ofense to those 07 ers but the stock gearing is slower- but if you got that that was your choice.
02-20-2007, 06:06 PM
#19
6th Gear Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Nicely done
Posts: 11,881
RE: 2007 models slower than 2005/2006 mustangs
no wash, you came out ahead! 
you set the record
straight AND you didn't pay the dreaded GG tax.
you set the recordstraight AND you didn't pay the dreaded GG tax.
ORIGINAL: MartyMoose
[sm=imsorry.gif]Well, I'm glad to announce that I was totally wrong for posting that I had to pay the GG tax!!
I don't know what I was thinking. Maybe I saw it on one of those window stickers for the GT500 posted on the Internet????
Well, yeah I feel kinda dumb. But I feelgood that I know I didn't pay for GG. It's kind of a wash though. [&:]
I guess we can now put that one to bed.
[sm=imsorry.gif]Well, I'm glad to announce that I was totally wrong for posting that I had to pay the GG tax!!
I don't know what I was thinking. Maybe I saw it on one of those window stickers for the GT500 posted on the Internet????
Well, yeah I feel kinda dumb. But I feelgood that I know I didn't pay for GG. It's kind of a wash though. [&:]
plus, no gas guzzler tax!!!
02-20-2007, 06:23 PM
#20
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Chicago (South Loop)
Posts: 685
RE: 2007 models slower than 2005/2006 mustangs
well, it is good to hear Ford isn't totally insane. hearing that that magazine was wrong about thegas guzzlertax is good news :-)
as for the 3.55 being an option though, that's BS. if you get the 3.55 though, performance shouldn't be THAT much slower...maybe .2 at most in the 1/4?
unfortunately, the 100lb weight difference is a reality, and the de-tune may be a reality as well. i would love to compare the tunes of a stock 2006 with a stock 2007 w/3.55 axle...or maybe it is tuned for the stock 3.31 axle which is why the tune is not the same even when you get the 3.55...
as for the 3.55 being an option though, that's BS. if you get the 3.55 though, performance shouldn't be THAT much slower...maybe .2 at most in the 1/4?
unfortunately, the 100lb weight difference is a reality, and the de-tune may be a reality as well. i would love to compare the tunes of a stock 2006 with a stock 2007 w/3.55 axle...or maybe it is tuned for the stock 3.31 axle which is why the tune is not the same even when you get the 3.55...