new dyno #s not to bad
#1
new dyno #s not to bad
put on the 3.6 saleen pullie, finally decided to do it after having the pully a while, any way i need to find my camera but it put down 452hp and 430 on trq, the best [art was i was on the 4.0 pully and we put the 3.6 on the s/c while the car was sitting on the dyno and those numbers were the first run. everything was perfect, he ran a second run to double check and i was on my way
#2
RE: new dyno #s not to bad
wow is the first thing that comes to mind.....very nice numbers [sm=gears.gif]
ORIGINAL: blackhorse05
put on the 3.6 saleen pullie, finally decided to do it after having the pully a while, any way i need to find my camera but it put down 452hp and 430 on trq, the best [art was i was on the 4.0 pully and we put the 3.6 on the s/c while the car was sitting on the dyno and those numbers were the first run. everything was perfect, he ran a second run to double check and i was on my way
put on the 3.6 saleen pullie, finally decided to do it after having the pully a while, any way i need to find my camera but it put down 452hp and 430 on trq, the best [art was i was on the 4.0 pully and we put the 3.6 on the s/c while the car was sitting on the dyno and those numbers were the first run. everything was perfect, he ran a second run to double check and i was on my way
#5
RE: new dyno #s not to bad
ORIGINAL: blackhorse05
dude, the louvers rock, almost lost them once but its good now, they get painted next week. im gonna be coming down soon, ill call ya
dude, the louvers rock, almost lost them once but its good now, they get painted next week. im gonna be coming down soon, ill call ya
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
YoungStangsMan
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
15
09-05-2015 07:01 PM
ricklmesa@cox.net
V6 S197 General Discussion
6
02-15-2006 05:47 PM
rygenstormlocke
V6 S197 General Discussion
31
02-08-2006 01:14 PM