2005-2014 Mustangs Discussions on the latest S197 model Mustangs from Ford.

False Advertising

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 22, 2007 | 09:47 AM
  #1  
ZZmustang's Avatar
ZZmustang
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 956
Default False Advertising

I wonder if it's possible to file a class action suit against ford for claiming 300 hp and every dyno I have seen says the GT has 260 or so. Isn’t this false advertising?
Old Jul 22, 2007 | 09:51 AM
  #2  
frdfrst's Avatar
frdfrst
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 240
From: az
Default RE: False Advertising

no not at all.its flywheel hp.
Old Jul 22, 2007 | 09:53 AM
  #3  
47Magic's Avatar
47Magic
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 125
From:
Default RE: False Advertising

Wow! I had to look up the number of your posts to be sure if you are serious... But with 900+ of them under your belt you were not aware of the difference?

+1 on the response above.
Old Jul 22, 2007 | 09:59 AM
  #4  
SonicBlue05GT's Avatar
SonicBlue05GT
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,918
From: Gulf Coast
Default RE: False Advertising

wow...

you're on a roll this morning, late night?[:-]
Old Jul 22, 2007 | 10:02 AM
  #5  
FenderParrothead's Avatar
FenderParrothead
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 488
From: Sunny Side of Louisville
Default RE: False Advertising

+ 1 All HP numbers you see advertised (on any car) is always the number at the flywheel.
Old Jul 22, 2007 | 10:10 AM
  #6  
ZZmustang's Avatar
ZZmustang
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 956
Default RE: False Advertising

Yes I know there is a difference between flywheel and rear wheel. But no where does it say flywheel hp rated. There isn't a easy way to check flywheel hp. But even if that is the case , at 260 rear wheel hp on a dyno, I doubt that the trans and rear end use 40 hp. Especially on a stick.
Horse power ratings
http://www.hardtail.com/techtips/hpexplained.html

[IMG]local://upfiles/58274/D63F9022496546119DD354EF53ADBBE7.jpg[/IMG]

[IMG]local://upfiles/58274/5BA29182834042359654471219F94EEE.jpg[/IMG]
Old Jul 22, 2007 | 10:19 AM
  #7  
Mikes_BLK_GT's Avatar
Mikes_BLK_GT
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,691
From: Pacific Northwest, USA
Default RE: False Advertising

15-20 percent parasitic loss depending on manual or auto the number varies but it would be 255 for a manual(300x 0.85) and 240 for an auto(300x0.80). Thats a just ageneral range on the parasitic loss but it's on the ballpark and is actually a little lower than you were thinking so maybe the loss isnt that bad afterall.
Old Jul 22, 2007 | 10:19 AM
  #8  
47Magic's Avatar
47Magic
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 125
From:
Default RE: False Advertising

Well, it is a known (obviously not as known as I thought) fact that every manufacturer posts engine hp numbers.
As far as how much HP you loose in between the flywheel and the rear tire, there is no need to loose sleep over it's acuracy. If dynos post RWHP in the mid 260s, it is just that; a mid 30s HP loss.
Ford or other renowned companies cannot lie about their engine output testing. I am not aware of how it is regulated, but there is some form of officiating within the industry.
Old Jul 22, 2007 | 10:19 AM
  #9  
D_Gusler's Avatar
D_Gusler
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 890
From: Danville, VA
Default RE: False Advertising

Well, if you figure a 15% drivetrain loss from a 300 hp starting point.
85% of 300 equals 255 rwhp. So I see nothing wrong with stock numbers around 260HP
Old Jul 22, 2007 | 10:22 AM
  #10  
tritonpwrd's Avatar
tritonpwrd
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 245
From:
Default RE: False Advertising

They do say its a 300hp "engine". They test them off of the car, I'm guessing at the engine manufacturer. Thats with any car. Why would any automaker advertise wheel hp when engine hp is always a bigger number? It makes it look better for the consumer. They have always done this sinse day 1. Its nothing new.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:36 AM.