Notices
2005-2014 Mustangs Discussions on the latest S197 model Mustangs from Ford.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Hurst vs. MGW vs. stock

Old 12-04-2007, 12:16 PM
  #1  
Juban
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Juban's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 126
Default Hurst vs. MGW vs. stock

So i've been searching a bit on Hurst and MGW shifters. Most people seem to love their Hurst shifter, and I hear a lot about how MGW is arguably one of the best shifter's out there. My main question is does either feel less notchy vs. the stock shifter? I'm leaning toward the hurst shifter because I want to pick up my cai, tune, and short shifter at once, so saving a little money on the shifter sounds like a good idea to me. Would I be disappointed in anything when going from a stocker to a Hurst?

Thanks for the input!
Juban is offline  
Old 12-04-2007, 12:29 PM
  #2  
howarmat
s197 Junkie
 
howarmat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: IN
Posts: 16,087
Default RE: Hurst vs. MGW vs. stock

I love my hurst, alot more notchy than the stock, very short....MGW will not have near the notchy feeling as the hurst though
howarmat is offline  
Old 12-04-2007, 12:43 PM
  #3  
Simon1
5th Gear Member
 
Simon1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Redding, CA
Posts: 4,552
Default RE: Hurst vs. MGW vs. stock

PRO5.0 FTW!
Simon1 is offline  
Old 12-04-2007, 01:45 PM
  #4  
SkyMaster19
2nd Gear Member
 
SkyMaster19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: West Palm Beach
Posts: 156
Default RE: Hurst vs. MGW vs. stock

This thread keeps resurfacing whether it be Hurst v. MGW, Hurst v. TriAxx, or MGW v. TriAxx. You really need to try and find one of each to compare the pros and cons. I was leaning towards the TriAxx, but ended up getting too sweet a deal on a new MGW (in the classifieds here). Very happy with mine. Ask 6 owners of different aftermarket shifters and you'll get 8 opinions. Regardless ANYTHING is better than stock.
SkyMaster19 is offline  
Old 12-04-2007, 01:54 PM
  #5  
FlaPony
3rd Gear Member
 
FlaPony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sunshine State
Posts: 588
Default RE: Hurst vs. MGW vs. stock

The MGW is a sweet setup. All I know is that I never miss 3rd gear unlike the stock POS.
FlaPony is offline  
Old 12-04-2007, 02:09 PM
  #6  
Juban
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Juban's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 126
Default RE: Hurst vs. MGW vs. stock

Thanks for the responses guys, I guess more or less what I should have asked is "does the Hurst perform well enough to justify the savings from the MGW or Pro shifters?" I know you often get what you pay for, so i'm not expecting to pay $100+ less on something and get the quality/ performance of the more expensive item.

Thanks again for the input.
Juban is offline  
Old 12-04-2007, 02:22 PM
  #7  
acascianelli
5th Gear Member
 
acascianelli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Sterling Heights, MI
Posts: 4,409
Default RE: Hurst vs. MGW vs. stock

ORIGINAL: Juban

does the Hurst perform well enough to justify the savings from the MGW or Pro shifters?"
Yes. As long as you like notchy shifts. If you're looking for smoothness, then the Hurst isn't the shifter you want.
acascianelli is offline  
Old 12-04-2007, 02:23 PM
  #8  
acstone7
3rd Gear Member
 
acstone7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tempe, Arizona
Posts: 790
Default RE: Hurst vs. MGW vs. stock

ORIGINAL: Juban

Thanks for the responses guys, I guess more or less what I should have asked is "does the Hurst perform well enough to justify the savings from the MGW or Pro shifters?" I know you often get what you pay for, so i'm not expecting to pay $100+ less on something and get the quality/ performance of the more expensive item.

Thanks again for the input.
I believe this all comes down to if you are wanting to powershift or not. If you do want to powershift, I reccomend staying away from the hurst and getting the MGW, solved my problem. If powershifting isnt an issue then I would go hurst, i loved the look and feel of it, just couldnt get over how it wouldnt PS for the life of me.
acstone7 is offline  
Old 12-04-2007, 02:24 PM
  #9  
alloutt
4th Gear Member
 
alloutt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: AE
Posts: 1,862
Default RE: Hurst vs. MGW vs. stock

MGW
alloutt is offline  
Old 12-04-2007, 02:50 PM
  #10  
DarkFireGT
4th Gear Member
 
DarkFireGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: East Moline, IL
Posts: 1,852
Default RE: Hurst vs. MGW vs. stock

ORIGINAL: acstone7

ORIGINAL: Juban

Thanks for the responses guys, I guess more or less what I should have asked is "does the Hurst perform well enough to justify the savings from the MGW or Pro shifters?" I know you often get what you pay for, so i'm not expecting to pay $100+ less on something and get the quality/ performance of the more expensive item.

Thanks again for the input.
I believe this all comes down to if you are wanting to powershift or not. If you do want to powershift, I reccomend staying away from the hurst and getting the MGW, solved my problem. If powershifting isnt an issue then I would go hurst, i loved the look and feel of it, just couldnt get over how it wouldnt PS for the life of me.
Hurst seems to powershift fine for me. Grip it and rip it!
DarkFireGT is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Hurst vs. MGW vs. stock



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:00 AM.