2005-2014 Mustangs Discussions on the latest S197 model Mustangs from Ford.

Hurst vs. MGW vs. stock

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 4, 2007 | 12:16 PM
  #1  
Juban's Avatar
Juban
Thread Starter
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 126
From: Louisiana
Default Hurst vs. MGW vs. stock

So i've been searching a bit on Hurst and MGW shifters. Most people seem to love their Hurst shifter, and I hear a lot about how MGW is arguably one of the best shifter's out there. My main question is does either feel less notchy vs. the stock shifter? I'm leaning toward the hurst shifter because I want to pick up my cai, tune, and short shifter at once, so saving a little money on the shifter sounds like a good idea to me. Would I be disappointed in anything when going from a stocker to a Hurst?

Thanks for the input!
Old Dec 4, 2007 | 12:29 PM
  #2  
howarmat's Avatar
howarmat
s197 Junkie
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 16,088
From: IN
Default RE: Hurst vs. MGW vs. stock

I love my hurst, alot more notchy than the stock, very short....MGW will not have near the notchy feeling as the hurst though
Old Dec 4, 2007 | 12:43 PM
  #3  
Simon1's Avatar
Simon1
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,552
From: Redding, CA
Default RE: Hurst vs. MGW vs. stock

PRO5.0 FTW!
Old Dec 4, 2007 | 01:45 PM
  #4  
SkyMaster19's Avatar
SkyMaster19
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 156
From: West Palm Beach
Default RE: Hurst vs. MGW vs. stock

This thread keeps resurfacing whether it be Hurst v. MGW, Hurst v. TriAxx, or MGW v. TriAxx. You really need to try and find one of each to compare the pros and cons. I was leaning towards the TriAxx, but ended up getting too sweet a deal on a new MGW (in the classifieds here). Very happy with mine. Ask 6 owners of different aftermarket shifters and you'll get 8 opinions. Regardless ANYTHING is better than stock.
Old Dec 4, 2007 | 01:54 PM
  #5  
FlaPony's Avatar
FlaPony
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 588
From: Sunshine State
Default RE: Hurst vs. MGW vs. stock

The MGW is a sweet setup. All I know is that I never miss 3rd gear unlike the stock POS.
Old Dec 4, 2007 | 02:09 PM
  #6  
Juban's Avatar
Juban
Thread Starter
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 126
From: Louisiana
Default RE: Hurst vs. MGW vs. stock

Thanks for the responses guys, I guess more or less what I should have asked is "does the Hurst perform well enough to justify the savings from the MGW or Pro shifters?" I know you often get what you pay for, so i'm not expecting to pay $100+ less on something and get the quality/ performance of the more expensive item.

Thanks again for the input.
Old Dec 4, 2007 | 02:22 PM
  #7  
acascianelli's Avatar
acascianelli
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,409
From: Sterling Heights, MI
Default RE: Hurst vs. MGW vs. stock

ORIGINAL: Juban

does the Hurst perform well enough to justify the savings from the MGW or Pro shifters?"
Yes. As long as you like notchy shifts. If you're looking for smoothness, then the Hurst isn't the shifter you want.
Old Dec 4, 2007 | 02:23 PM
  #8  
acstone7's Avatar
acstone7
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 790
From: Tempe, Arizona
Default RE: Hurst vs. MGW vs. stock

ORIGINAL: Juban

Thanks for the responses guys, I guess more or less what I should have asked is "does the Hurst perform well enough to justify the savings from the MGW or Pro shifters?" I know you often get what you pay for, so i'm not expecting to pay $100+ less on something and get the quality/ performance of the more expensive item.

Thanks again for the input.
I believe this all comes down to if you are wanting to powershift or not. If you do want to powershift, I reccomend staying away from the hurst and getting the MGW, solved my problem. If powershifting isnt an issue then I would go hurst, i loved the look and feel of it, just couldnt get over how it wouldnt PS for the life of me.
Old Dec 4, 2007 | 02:24 PM
  #9  
alloutt's Avatar
alloutt
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,862
From: AE
Default RE: Hurst vs. MGW vs. stock

MGW
Old Dec 4, 2007 | 02:50 PM
  #10  
DarkFireGT's Avatar
DarkFireGT
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,852
From: East Moline, IL
Default RE: Hurst vs. MGW vs. stock

ORIGINAL: acstone7

ORIGINAL: Juban

Thanks for the responses guys, I guess more or less what I should have asked is "does the Hurst perform well enough to justify the savings from the MGW or Pro shifters?" I know you often get what you pay for, so i'm not expecting to pay $100+ less on something and get the quality/ performance of the more expensive item.

Thanks again for the input.
I believe this all comes down to if you are wanting to powershift or not. If you do want to powershift, I reccomend staying away from the hurst and getting the MGW, solved my problem. If powershifting isnt an issue then I would go hurst, i loved the look and feel of it, just couldnt get over how it wouldnt PS for the life of me.
Hurst seems to powershift fine for me. Grip it and rip it!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:21 AM.