Notices
2005-2014 Mustangs Discussions on the latest S197 model Mustangs from Ford.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

FRPP cams/idle issues

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-06-2008, 05:53 PM
  #41  
Rubrignitz
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Rubrignitz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: TX
Posts: 4,897
Default

At least I can slap around all the LSx mustang haters around here now. That's my purpose in life .
Rubrignitz is offline  
Old 11-06-2008, 06:25 PM
  #42  
Flatline1980
2nd Gear Member
 
Flatline1980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: TN
Posts: 493
Default

congrats on the car.. You gonna post up a video for us??
Flatline1980 is offline  
Old 11-06-2008, 06:28 PM
  #43  
SirKnightTG
5th Gear Member
 
SirKnightTG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Deep in the <3 of Tx
Posts: 3,925
Default

Very tempted to go to murillo now.
SirKnightTG is offline  
Old 11-06-2008, 06:39 PM
  #44  
Rubrignitz
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Rubrignitz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: TX
Posts: 4,897
Default

Originally Posted by Flatline1980
congrats on the car.. You gonna post up a video for us??
You know it! Videos and dyno sheets, for sure.

Sirknight.. I'm going to let them know that new business is coming if I'm happy with the car. Hell, with those numbers even if I'm not (personally) happy the cams are worth the investment.

Those numbers are on a mustang dyno. Dont't they register about 10% lower than a dynojet, where I got my initial 320whp numbers? I'll probably dyno close to 350whp on a dynojet!
Rubrignitz is offline  
Old 11-06-2008, 06:45 PM
  #45  
Flatline1980
2nd Gear Member
 
Flatline1980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: TN
Posts: 493
Default

Originally Posted by Rubrignitz
You know it! Videos and dyno sheets, for sure.
SOLID!! The video may be a deal maker me making an upcoming mod when money gets rite..
Flatline1980 is offline  
Old 11-06-2008, 06:48 PM
  #46  
Rubrignitz
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Rubrignitz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: TX
Posts: 4,897
Default

I'll post but wouldn't make too much of the exhaust note video. I told them I could care LESS about how the exhaust sounds, just tune it to where the exhaust is as smooth as possible w/o affecting performance.

I don't care about rumpity exhaust, I was more interested in the power output.
Rubrignitz is offline  
Old 11-06-2008, 06:50 PM
  #47  
shanec
4th Gear Member
 
shanec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 1,679
Default

Let us know how the mpg gets affected to. Obviously with a Mustang, I'm not about being a fuel mizer. But I don't want to step off into a mpg pit either.
shanec is offline  
Old 11-06-2008, 06:56 PM
  #48  
Rubrignitz
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Rubrignitz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: TX
Posts: 4,897
Default

They wrung another 17whp and 20wtq out of the car, and that's on a mustang vs. dynojet dyno. It HAS to run better! I'll definitely be checking the mileage on the 87 mile trip back up to Austin.
Rubrignitz is offline  
Old 11-06-2008, 07:15 PM
  #49  
SirKnightTG
5th Gear Member
 
SirKnightTG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Deep in the <3 of Tx
Posts: 3,925
Default

Well I definitely don't want a smooth idle. I'd keep my stock cams if I wanted that. I mainly want these for the lope. It's either these or the Thumprs and I'd rather have these due to the consistent perf gains.

So I'll be paying a lot of attention to how it sounds when you make a video.
SirKnightTG is offline  
Old 11-06-2008, 07:17 PM
  #50  
SirKnightTG
5th Gear Member
 
SirKnightTG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Deep in the <3 of Tx
Posts: 3,925
Default

I'd LOVE to have an idle like this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DG65mcICyuY

LOL
SirKnightTG is offline  


Quick Reply: FRPP cams/idle issues



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:48 AM.