2005-2014 Mustangs Discussions on the latest S197 model Mustangs from Ford.

Gas milage

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 5, 2009 | 10:46 AM
  #31  
pdub42's Avatar
pdub42
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 102
From: ohio
Default

just picked up my 5 speed gt yesterday and had a 118mile drive home, according to my gauge thing i got 30mpg avg
Old Apr 5, 2009 | 11:48 AM
  #32  
06BeastGT's Avatar
06BeastGT
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 29
From: BROOKLYN NYC
Default

Damm i cant get over 9-10 mpg .... but i drive 95% in the city... Are you city guys getting better numbers ???
Old Apr 5, 2009 | 12:00 PM
  #33  
Nuke's Avatar
Nuke
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 16,182
From: PA to KY ('07) to IL ('09) to MS ('10) to FL ('11)
Default

Man, this is one of those topics that just won't go away.

IF you're using the on-board computer to post your MPG numbers, hang it up. And if you are using it, at least post #'s that show your avergae from fill-up to fill-up. In other words, reset it at the punp when you fill-up and don't touch it until the next fill-up. Any other use of the on-board is a waste of everyone's time. Even then, the typical on-board is about 1-2 MPG high. Hand calculation is the only way to go and then average THOSE numbers over the course of a few months, THEN post your numbers.

Even then, % highway vs city, driving style, tire inflation, road terrain and weather conditions will all play into the mix. I even see changes due to ambient temperature and humidity.
Old Apr 5, 2009 | 12:24 PM
  #34  
bplemmons's Avatar
bplemmons
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 77
Default gas milage

Doug at bamma chips told me you can't go by what the computer says if you have an aftermarket intake, has anyone checked their mileage against the computer with the JLT intake and bamma tune?

BP
Old Apr 5, 2009 | 03:57 PM
  #35  
Mustangmaster's Avatar
Mustangmaster
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 788
From: Lewisetta, Virginia
Default

I don't think any internal computer from a car is going to be 100% correct. The good thing is it's usually within 1-2 mpg of what it does say. I have a Granatelli CAI and I usually get about 1.5 mpg less than what it reads. So, it's close and gives us a good idea of what we're getting.
Old Apr 5, 2009 | 06:43 PM
  #36  
S197steve's Avatar
S197steve
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,491
From: TEXAS
Default

I always hand calculate my mileage, every single tank... I keep a running log of each fill-up. :-)

Now that I'm not driving 50 miles of highway each day my mileage has gone down quite a bit. I typically get around 18-19 mpg now, but that's probably about 75% city driving.
Old Apr 5, 2009 | 06:55 PM
  #37  
Shadow7874's Avatar
Shadow7874
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,636
From: Henry County, Georgia
Default

Originally Posted by Steve O Chap
Some of us have 3.31 gears and are sitting at 1900 rpms at 72mph.... :-)

Just because you don't get good mileage doesn't mean all of us don't...
not to mention some of us have 5 speeds, so we get better mpg and power anyways. Personally i dont see why the CPU would be very wrong. Its odometer is accurate, and fuel consumption is known, its not like its guessing. a couple mpg is a reasonable error though, so when my car is floating just under 32 mpg on the highway going 60, i would believe 30 no problem.
Old Apr 5, 2009 | 10:17 PM
  #38  
daltron's Avatar
daltron
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 140
From: California
Default

Well, today my my gas gauge showed just a tad before the last mark (in the past I've been able to run it down past the last mark) and I figured on filling up at the shell next to fashion island in newport beach, ca when my car started to chug. Luckily by the time it died I had enough going to get over the hill and coast down right into the shell station at the bottom lol. Talk about not a second too soon. I reset everything after every fill up, and today when I stopped at shell I had:

288 Miles to the tank
18.6 MPG
15.5 gallons used

I was able to fill up 15.906 gallons according to the reciept.
Old Apr 6, 2009 | 07:05 AM
  #39  
Nuke's Avatar
Nuke
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 16,182
From: PA to KY ('07) to IL ('09) to MS ('10) to FL ('11)
Default

Wow, running your tank empty to calculate your mileage. How... fascinating.
Old Apr 6, 2009 | 05:30 PM
  #40  
Mustangmaster's Avatar
Mustangmaster
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 788
From: Lewisetta, Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by Shadow7874
not to mention some of us have 5 speeds, so we get better mpg and power anyways. Personally i dont see why the CPU would be very wrong. Its odometer is accurate, and fuel consumption is known, its not like its guessing. a couple mpg is a reasonable error though, so when my car is floating just under 32 mpg on the highway going 60, i would believe 30 no problem.
Well, we hope the odometer is accurate. 30 mpg with V8s is great. Who needs a Prius? I'd buy a Escape Hybrid or the upcoming Fusion Hybrid or Chevy Volt before I bought a Prius.

SteveO, I keep a running tab of every tank of gas mileage too. Varies according to how much city driving I do. Fun to keep up with though.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:58 PM.