http://www.carversation.com/2009/04/...challenger-rt/

 

Ya its been blown up on youtube with fanboys on all 3 sides stating why theirs is the better pick. Some people saying that the Ford only got 4.9 because they sent the 3k track pack upgrade instead of stock. Others throwing out that They have seen kelly blue book reviews showing the Camaro doing 0-60 in 4.4 seconds stock. Some saying they should of used the SRT8 instead of the RT. And yet others saying Camaro cant even release the vehicle on time and its all old news.

Still not sure why people cant choose what they like for themselves and not try to impose their view as what should be gospel. All in all I think it was a good review.

 

Interesting indeed, were they going off the price ranges? b/c I know they weren't going from the horsepower aspect. Now if they brought in one of the limited edition cars such as the GT500 then I think the reporter would of had some better feedback.

I am wondering how long the Challenger/ Camaro will stick around this time...