2005-2014 Mustangs Discussions on the latest S197 model Mustangs from Ford.

Salvaging an 06 GT - looking at putting a carb motor

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 9, 2009 | 09:51 AM
  #21  
flinkpoyd01's Avatar
flinkpoyd01
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 16
From: Iowa
Default

I think that most posters in this thread are reading too much into the LSx vs 4.6 comments. It doesn't appear that this thread was created to bash Ford products. Although we may all disagree with the OP about this or that, the truth is the concept of swapping a hot carbed motor into an S197 is pretty interesting. Maybe we can stick to the main intent of the thread? Anyone have useful information (non bashing) to provide?
Old Dec 9, 2009 | 10:04 AM
  #22  
cavediver's Avatar
cavediver
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 578
From: Eagle, Idaho
Default

Originally Posted by n618ft
Small displacement, low compression... you have a point, but still not the kind of power I'm looking for! High displacement, high compression

Yeah, those new Pontiac GTO's were so popular that Pontiac couldn't give them away and then even Pontiac went belly up. Talk about "dogs" I think Pontiac and GTO fits the description just fine.
Old Dec 9, 2009 | 10:36 AM
  #23  
SirKnightTG's Avatar
SirKnightTG
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,925
From: Deep in the <3 of Tx
Default

The old GTOs were great and I'd love to have one (especially the first 1964 model w/ a 4-speed and 389 - like the song says lol), but I was (and still am) VERY dissapointed in the last gen GTOs. Sure it has a nice engine, but the body/platform they chose was totally wrong. The car looked nothing special, like all the other plain jane cars from Pontiac and did not have that same aggressive muscle car look the old GTOs had. A different body and they would have been great but who ever was at Pontiac that made the decision to go with what they did was a moron. Looking at Pontiac's modern cars I can see why they killed that company. They lost their way and is nothing like they used to be.
Old Dec 9, 2009 | 12:45 PM
  #24  
robs's Avatar
robs
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 502
From: Ofallon, IL
Default

I was looking at Goats before the Mustang. Goats were in the exact same price range. Seat of the pants feel was much better even though flat out numbers aren't much different. The 4.6 is a great engine, but it's gotta see 4 grand before it starts really being impressive (mine anyway).

Fit, finish and tons of little problems with the goat drove me away and back to my senses.

I imagine more bottom end grunt is what he's looking for.
Old Dec 9, 2009 | 01:02 PM
  #25  
07 Stang's Avatar
07 Stang
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,411
From: Southeast Virginia
Default

A friend of mine who drag races cars has a 2007 Mustang Shelby powered by a 526 Blown Ford hemi.

Old Dec 9, 2009 | 01:47 PM
  #26  
SirKnightTG's Avatar
SirKnightTG
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,925
From: Deep in the <3 of Tx
Default

Originally Posted by 07 Stang
A friend of mine who drag races cars has a 2007 Mustang Shelby powered by a 526 Blown Ford hemi.


Holy hell. I demand more pics and videos of that!
Old Dec 9, 2009 | 02:07 PM
  #27  
07 Stang's Avatar
07 Stang
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,411
From: Southeast Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by SirKnightTG
Holy hell. I demand more pics and videos of that!
I'll see if he has any posted on YouTube. He is serious when it comes to Ford cars and their potential.

I did see this....a 1000hp Mustang;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M4Vi4...om=PL&index=19

Last edited by 07 Stang; Dec 9, 2009 at 02:12 PM.
Old Dec 9, 2009 | 03:21 PM
  #28  
UpTo11's Avatar
UpTo11
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 743
From: DFW
Default

Know what I'D like to see? A retro-style butterfly intake on an S197. That'd be AWESOME, or lame. I guess it depends on what the car looks like.
Old Dec 10, 2009 | 07:00 AM
  #29  
distantsoldier's Avatar
distantsoldier
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 321
From: Georgia
Default

Originally Posted by SilasX93
Know what I'D like to see? A retro-style butterfly intake on an S197. That'd be AWESOME, or lame. I guess it depends on what the car looks like.
Go to YouTube and look up Techco Ram Air Butterfly Hood for 05-09 Mustangs.
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/MQGi5saeVVM&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/MQGi5saeVVM&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>


As for the GTO vs Mustang dealings....
1.) I can understand fixing up an old car with all modern day electronics and safety features, as well as comforts....I cannot understand fixing a new car up with outdated technology. I will continue to stay on the band wagon of..."There's a reason the mustang has been in steady production for 45 years straight when no other "muscle car" has..."
2.) Base Price: 2006 Pontiac GTO - $31,290 (now worth 17,300)
Paid for my 2007 Mustang GT - 24,000 (now worth 16,800)
I think with the money I would have saved I would have spanked that @$$...that is, had I not stepped up to the beast I have now...
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GimpyHSHS
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
7
Aug 29, 2015 06:30 PM
mtxplod
Speed Density/Carb/SSP section
8
Aug 29, 2015 01:43 AM
HorsePower99
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
1
Aug 26, 2015 11:29 PM
HorsePower99
General Tech
2
Aug 26, 2015 08:32 PM
Jacob4589
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
3
Aug 8, 2015 11:00 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:38 PM.