2005-2014 Mustangs Discussions on the latest S197 model Mustangs from Ford.

N/A mods

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 3, 2010 | 07:30 PM
  #21  
UpTo11's Avatar
UpTo11
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 743
From: DFW
Default

I heard STS systems are usually better for smaller motors and that they have serious heat soak problems. (Legion5, we all miss you.)
Old Jun 3, 2010 | 09:48 PM
  #22  
DRock's Avatar
DRock
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 702
From: Cali
Default

Originally Posted by Thrashard340
Passing visual is only half the battle. The other half is beating tailpipe emissions. High flow heads may allow you to get more air/fuel mixture in, but it is also almost certainly going to increase exhaust emissions as well. Some of you guys are throwing suggestions out there that won't pass CA smog. But maybe the the OP should clarify to what degree of smog friendliness he wants his parts to be. CA is probably one of the top 3 toughest states to pass smog. In most areas, it requires dyno-load testing.
Imma try a cam and im gonna try longtubes. I will tell you how it goes in 2015.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
UrS4
S197 Handling Section
10
Oct 3, 2015 06:23 AM
AMAlexLazarus
AmericanMuscle.com
0
Oct 1, 2015 10:29 AM
TimeLord101
New Member Area
2
Oct 1, 2015 06:40 AM
firecoyote
S550 2015-2023 Mustang
28
Sep 27, 2015 02:37 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:59 PM.