2005-2014 Mustangs Discussions on the latest S197 model Mustangs from Ford.

Got dynod today

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 14, 2010 | 08:40 PM
  #1  
09cs's Avatar
09cs
Thread Starter
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,016
From: California
Default Got dynod today

And I'm kinda disappointed with the results...

Best run was 276 RWHP and 291 RWTQ

I have a FRPP CAI/tune and Roush extreme exhaust. I know that it is probably FRPP that is hurting me. But still, a friend who has no engine mods dynod with higher numbers, so didn't think the tune would make me LOOSE power.
Old Nov 14, 2010 | 08:55 PM
  #2  
ikemikestang's Avatar
ikemikestang
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 346
From: Florida
Default

Those numbers are pretty low
Old Nov 14, 2010 | 09:34 PM
  #3  
09cs's Avatar
09cs
Thread Starter
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,016
From: California
Default

Yeah I know.. I didn't think the FRPP tune was THAT bad!!!
Old Nov 14, 2010 | 09:43 PM
  #4  
TorchedGT's Avatar
TorchedGT
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 100
From: Virginia
Default

Yeah something's not right, I'd start to look at some stock issues that might be influencing those numbers (ie. fuel system, ignition/spark plugs.. something stupid like that) I'm not sure what an FRPP tune is supposed to do, but I put 26 hp / 22lb-ft more torque than that with an email tillman tune @ 95 degrees. I have UDPs but that shouldn't make a difference (~3-5hp) - granted my numbers were higher than average, but you should see at least 10-15 hp more than that.
Old Nov 14, 2010 | 09:47 PM
  #5  
gman73's Avatar
gman73
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,018
From: Escondido, California
Default

It would have been ideal if you dynoed your car on the same dyno before the intake and tune. Are you auto or manual and what about your friend? Manuals experience about a 10 to 15% parasitic loss and autos have about 18 to 20% loss.
Old Nov 14, 2010 | 09:49 PM
  #6  
09cs's Avatar
09cs
Thread Starter
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,016
From: California
Default

Both manuals.
Old Nov 14, 2010 | 09:49 PM
  #7  
09cs's Avatar
09cs
Thread Starter
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,016
From: California
Default

I think I'm going to try a new tune and some UDP's
Old Nov 14, 2010 | 10:33 PM
  #8  
TorchedGT's Avatar
TorchedGT
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 100
From: Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by 09cs
I think I'm going to try a new tune and some UDP's
Good call, shoot for an aggressive 93 octane tune, and if things still don't add up I'd begin to troubleshoot the basics (like I mentioned before, spark plugs, fuel filter/pressures, etc) even stupid stuff like the gas station you choose and how heat soaked your engine is can contribute.

gman - for the record, the transmission loss for our cars is actually documented at 16%. 10% is virtually unheard of. IRS cars will be higher still - 16 isn't that bad.
Old Nov 15, 2010 | 12:03 AM
  #9  
08blackoutstang's Avatar
08blackoutstang
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,768
From: Washington
Default

dang dude
Old Nov 15, 2010 | 01:31 AM
  #10  
DRock's Avatar
DRock
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 702
From: Cali
Default

Originally Posted by TorchedGT
Good call, shoot for an aggressive 93 octane tune, and if things still don't add up I'd begin to troubleshoot the basics (like I mentioned before, spark plugs, fuel filter/pressures, etc) even stupid stuff like the gas station you choose and how heat soaked your engine is can contribute.

gman - for the record, the transmission loss for our cars is actually documented at 16%. 10% is virtually unheard of. IRS cars will be higher still - 16 isn't that bad.
Im the friend he is talking about. We dont have 93 around here just **** gas of 91.

I put down 275hp and 296 ftlb torque with Flowmaster 40's as my only mod.

I do only have 3.31's and 18's while he has 3.55's and 20's though...........



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:38 PM.