Notices
2005-2014 Mustangs Discussions on the latest S197 model Mustangs from Ford.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

gear ratios

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-23-2011, 01:03 PM
  #11  
Shelby305
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Shelby305's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 64
Default

I didn't wanna specify the type of race purposely, I wanted to know which would excel where, I kind of already knew but wanted to make sure thanks guys (y)
Shelby305 is offline  
Old 03-23-2011, 03:27 PM
  #12  
adidasUNT8
3rd Gear Member
 
adidasUNT8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 977
Default

also if you plan on going FI like I am in the middle of doing... most people will not want the 4.10 gears because of lack of traction... I have 4.10's and will be switching out to 3.55s
adidasUNT8 is offline  
Old 03-23-2011, 05:47 PM
  #13  
JIM5.0
5th Gear Member
 
JIM5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,404
Default

Originally Posted by adidasUNT8
also if you plan on going FI like I am in the middle of doing... most people will not want the 4.10 gears because of lack of traction... I have 4.10's and will be switching out to 3.55s
Very good point. If your final total gear ratio is too deep (rear gear time tranny gear you are in and considering the outside diameter of your rear tires), all you will be doing is spinning your wheels and getting nowhere while burning gas and rubber fast.


Speaking of 4.10:1 rear gears, I found out that with the TR3650 and 3.55:1 rear gear, you have the same total gear ratio as a T56 with 2.95:1 1st and 4.10:1 rear gear.
JIM5.0 is offline  
Old 03-23-2011, 10:27 PM
  #14  
REDBOSS1
3rd Gear Member
 
REDBOSS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Illinois
Posts: 879
Default

As many have said driver is big, I could not get the 4.10s to hook up well so I actually think my low end speed with 3.55 is just as good because they don't create as much torque allowing them to hook up. I had 3.55 in my car with and intake and tune, then I went to 4.10. While the 4.10 was slightly better on the 0-60 when I was NA I went back to 3.55 when I got supercharged. I think 4.10 is fun but 1st gear is worthless as they did not hook up what so ever for me.
REDBOSS1 is offline  
Old 03-23-2011, 10:44 PM
  #15  
onederful100
6th Gear Member
 
onederful100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 6,130
Default

i could spin the tires when i was stock with 3.55's
now i got 4.10's with the Whipple, and spinning the tires is much easier
i can also feather the throttle a bit in first and feather it a little less in 2nd and it launches pretty well.
my tires are not stock, they are 28.5" tall and 295's in back, so that helps with the traction
i have not run it with slicks, but that would definately get better traction
and my suspension is stock also, so suspension work would make it better also.
so there are many variables to this trick question.
too much power is better than too little.
onederful100 is offline  
Old 03-24-2011, 08:42 AM
  #16  
Norm Peterson
6th Gear Member
 
Norm Peterson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: state of confusion
Posts: 7,635
Default

Originally Posted by Shelby305
if you get 2 mustangs exactly the same and you have one with a set of 3.55s and one with 4.10s what is the outcome?
Not enough data.

Depending on what you pick for a speed range, the car with 3.55's and the tranny in any particular gear can briefly pull away from the 4.10 car once the 4.10 driver has to upshift to the next higher gear.

The car is ultimately aero drag limited at just above an apparent speed limiter setting. Meaning that the 4.10 car can still pull the same top end mph (and would actually top out a couple of mph or so above the 3.55 car without any limiter). But the 3.55 car in 4th would (relatively speaking) run away and hide from the 4.10 car from 125 on up (where you'd need to be in 5th).


Norm
Norm Peterson is offline  
Old 03-25-2011, 09:16 PM
  #17  
wcgman
5th Gear Member
 
wcgman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,652
Default

You guys are overthinking this. So the OP wasnt specific about environmentals, driver who has a full vs/empty colon, etc...but pretty sure they were very simple.

All things created equal, 4.10s are faster over shorter distance, but top speed will not be as high as the 3.55 over a longer distance. If you just hot rod around town, get 4.10's. They are more fun IMO. If you drive the open road a lot, go with 3.55's.
wcgman is offline  
Old 03-26-2011, 01:27 PM
  #18  
Norm Peterson
6th Gear Member
 
Norm Peterson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: state of confusion
Posts: 7,635
Default

Originally Posted by wcgman
You guys are overthinking this.
Maybe. But it can't be helped when the problem is under-defined from the get-go.


If you go through the math - not just the theoretical speeds in gear at redline, but including the effects of drag, power curve, and a few other things - you'll find that there isn't a lot of difference between 3.55's and 4.10's as far as top speed is concerned. And the 4.10 car would actually be a little faster in the absence of any speed limiting.


Norm
Norm Peterson is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Thunderball
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
15
11-22-2015 11:49 PM
Bokeo
Street/Strip
6
10-10-2015 08:28 PM
KingRando
2005-2014 Mustangs
5
10-02-2015 08:06 AM
uedlose
The Racers Bench
4
10-01-2015 08:31 PM
junior04
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
1
09-28-2015 10:53 AM



Quick Reply: gear ratios



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:58 AM.