My old man claims this...... - Page 9 -

2005-2014 Mustangs Discussions on the latest S197 model Mustangs from Ford.

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-03-2011, 09:17 AM   #81  
4th Gear Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,470

Perceptions of straight line acceleration differences between factory production classic muscle cars and current muscle cars are irrelevant when factual data is considered. And I am talking about comparing test numbers from the late 60's/early 70's and today.
ski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2011, 11:08 AM   #82  
Norm Peterson
6th Gear Member
Norm Peterson's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: state of confusion
Posts: 7,470

Comparison is what you can do when the numbers are sitting in front of you. It's what you have to do if you weren't there the first time around or didn't pay much attention to cars if you were. My 10-years-younger brother could be the poster child for either . . .

Perception is what makes up memories, and it becomes part of what you have left to go on in the absence of hard numerical data. It's also most all of what OP's Dad has to go on.

Of course there is a difference.

Norm Peterson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2011, 11:15 AM   #83  
4th Gear Member
Unleashedbeast's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Pensacola, Florida
Posts: 1,461

Originally Posted by ski View Post
I wonder how tired those classic muscle car engines were?
They were all restored/refreshed. This isn't even a consideration of the performance variance.
Unleashedbeast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2011, 12:47 PM   #84  
4th Gear Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,470

I owned a '68 383 RoadRunner in 1968 when I was 20. It wasn't the factory stock king of the hill, running the 1/4 in the 14's.
But I also drove a few other faster factory stock muscle cars owned by friends(427 Vette, Mopar Hemi & 6-Pack, & 427 Ford Fairlane), and I saw them run the 1/4 anywhere from the high 12's-low 13's at a local drag strip.
So I suppose one can say I have both comparison and perception, which in my case do not differ according to what I've experienced and what I've read.
ski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2011, 01:12 PM   #85  
4th Gear Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,470

If those engines were tight, then the drivers apparently had a bad driver mod according to the majority of acceleration tests performed with those cars during that era.

When muscle cars are compared, there's one item that is always top priority => straight line performance.

Last edited by ski; 06-03-2011 at 01:14 PM.
ski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2011, 10:25 PM   #86  
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
outceltj's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: IN
Posts: 2,070

I suppose when I get a little older the same comparisons will be made and kids will be talking about there sports cars and comparing them to what I am running now. It will be interesting too see where the sports car era will be in say another 20 to 25 years. Hopefully SEMA can keep the american sports car just that SPORTS CAR.
outceltj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2011, 08:19 AM   #87  
S197 Section Modder-ator
pascal's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Orlando FL
Posts: 13,324

The good thing about the old cars is that with just a bit of tweaking, you could take about all of them in the 12s because of the big cube.
Cams and carburetor mods get you 50hp right of the bat.
For example, the Boss 429 was tested at 14" bone stock but tune that thing properly and you can do some spanking.
My best friend neighbor used to have one of those and he tracked it in the 11s.
The idiot should have never sold that car.
pascal is offline   Reply With Quote

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Kenny Brown AGS 4.0 panhard bar relocation flash_xx S197 Handling Section 14 10-16-2015 07:23 AM
Street Action Tonight Explosive Street/Strip 17 10-02-2015 07:45 AM
Finally drove 2015 Automatic w/ Ford Racing Handling Package, very nice. mungodrums The New S550 2015-2017 Mustang 7 09-29-2015 09:18 PM
Fuel Pump for 98 3.8L model. Not sure which type? mrappe V6 (1994-2004) Mustangs 0 09-26-2015 10:16 AM
cobra vs heavy hitter vette's ctgreddy Street/Strip 11 09-20-2015 08:35 PM

2005, 2011, 74, car, carburetor, city, diagram, fj40, fuel, line, mach, mustang, panama, shows, wheelie

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump

Featured Sponsors
Vendor Directory

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:57 AM.

We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to and affiliated sites.