Notices
2005-2014 Mustangs Discussions on the latest S197 model Mustangs from Ford.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

So... Boss 302?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-27-2011, 10:08 AM
  #11  
GT Premi
3rd Gear Member
 
GT Premi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 971
Default

No it's not. Don't hate. You guys are trying to make it seem like the Boss murders the GT500 in handling and it clearly doesn't. They're so close that it's literally a driver's race. That's all I'm saying. Has nothing to do with the fact I own a GT500.
GT Premi is offline  
Old 05-27-2011, 10:22 AM
  #12  
pdonket
4th Gear Member
 
pdonket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Illinois
Posts: 1,846
Default

Originally Posted by GT Premi
No it's not. Don't hate. You guys are trying to make it seem like the Boss murders the GT500 in handling and it clearly doesn't. They're so close that it's literally a driver's race. That's all I'm saying. Has nothing to do with the fact I own a GT500.
I'm not arguing that the Boss murders the GT500, but my point is that because the 500 puts more power down to the road, the boss has to be making the time up on the track from somewhere. It's not the 444hp engine...so I'm fairly certain it's going to be in how it handles the road. It's not to say that the GT500 doesn't handle well too, it's just that the Boss 302 I would venture to say handles better.
pdonket is offline  
Old 05-27-2011, 10:35 AM
  #13  
LostBoyz
4th Gear Member
 
LostBoyz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: MI
Posts: 1,292
Default

Originally Posted by pdonket
I'm not arguing that the Boss murders the GT500, but my point is that because the 500 puts more power down to the road, the boss has to be making the time up on the track from somewhere. It's not the 444hp engine...so I'm fairly certain it's going to be in how it handles the road. It's not to say that the GT500 doesn't handle well too, it's just that the Boss 302 I would venture to say handles better.
This, ~100hp deficit yet comes up similar track times. That and N/A is preferred for tracking, less chance of heat soak and more linear power distribution.

It depends what you want, personal preference really.
LostBoyz is offline  
Old 05-27-2011, 10:38 AM
  #14  
GT Premi
3rd Gear Member
 
GT Premi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 971
Default

I get what you're saying, but I can't agree that the Boss really outhandles the GT500. The GT500 just overpowers the chassis. Power slides are fun to do and look at, but don't help track times. I don't think it's so much the Boss made up time as it is the GT500 lost time.
GT Premi is offline  
Old 05-27-2011, 10:49 AM
  #15  
2005Redfire6
6th Gear Member
 
2005Redfire6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Acworth, GA
Posts: 12,260
Default

Originally Posted by GT Premi
I get what you're saying, but I can't agree that the Boss really outhandles the GT500. The GT500 just overpowers the chassis. Power slides are fun to do and look at, but don't help track times. I don't think it's so much the Boss made up time as it is the GT500 lost time.
And thats what makes a handling difference between the Boss and the GT500, not knocking you or your car at all.
2005Redfire6 is offline  
Old 05-27-2011, 11:19 AM
  #16  
siggyfreud
5th Gear Member
 
siggyfreud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 2,645
Default

Originally Posted by GT Premi
A few seconds? The Boss was only .5 second quicker through the slalom. So I could flip the script and say a car that weighs around 200 pounds less and has a purpose built track suspension was only .5 second quicker through a slalom than the pig of a car GT500. Do you firmly agree w/ that, pdonket?
Meant to say 2mph slower. FWIW it completed Laguna 4 seconds faster than the GT500.
siggyfreud is offline  
Old 05-27-2011, 11:52 AM
  #17  
GT Premi
3rd Gear Member
 
GT Premi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 971
Default

That just reinforces what I said about it being a driver's race.
GT Premi is offline  
Old 05-27-2011, 11:57 AM
  #18  
siggyfreud
5th Gear Member
 
siggyfreud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 2,645
Default

I don't disagree. But with the GT500 making considerably MORE power than the B302, you have to take into consideration the factor(s) that make the B302 quicker around that track.
siggyfreud is offline  
Old 05-27-2011, 12:10 PM
  #19  
onederful100
6th Gear Member
 
onederful100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 6,130
Default

both are great Mustangs.
you cant go wrong with either one.
but they are designed for different driving.
the Boss is designed to be a road course track car that is street legal.
the GT500 is a street car that has a lot of power. not a race car.
put enough money into either one, and you can end at what you want.
SC a Boss and you'll have a fast track car.
do some supension mods and tires on the GT500 and you'll have a powerful street car that can handle.

personally i wouldn't buy either one. I'm a GT guy, plain and simple.
i'll mod it and be proud when it beats up on higher priced specialty models.
onederful100 is offline  
Old 05-27-2011, 12:15 PM
  #20  
LostBoyz
4th Gear Member
 
LostBoyz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: MI
Posts: 1,292
Default

Originally Posted by GT Premi
I get what you're saying, but I can't agree that the Boss really outhandles the GT500. The GT500 just overpowers the chassis. Power slides are fun to do and look at, but don't help track times. I don't think it's so much the Boss made up time as it is the GT500 lost time.
Umm, you either have an amateur driver, or the only way around the track with the car is a little oversteer, which means the handling isn't as balanced as the boss. Now matter which way you slice it, one handles better or is EASIER to handle.

Its personal preference, do you want to man handle your car trying to get every bit of HP down or do you want something a bit more easily controlled so you can focus on hitting every apex?
LostBoyz is offline  


Quick Reply: So... Boss 302?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:04 AM.