Notices
2005-2014 Mustangs Discussions on the latest S197 model Mustangs from Ford.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

More Torque for Street

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-09-2011, 10:58 PM
  #21  
siggyfreud
5th Gear Member
 
siggyfreud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 2,645
Default

Originally Posted by Simon1
Nothing. Go find another hobby or pay for a tune. I prefer the second option.
^^^+1

If you're going to mod the car without tuning it properly, stick to appearance mods.
siggyfreud is offline  
Old 06-09-2011, 11:37 PM
  #22  
07BLACKGT
5th Gear Member
 
07BLACKGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Alabama
Posts: 2,935
Default

TUNE IT. Bama Tuning offers a fantastic Torque tune for the 4.6, so I'm sure they have it for the 5.0 as well.

Steps of buying a Mustang:

1. Sign papers.
2. Install tune.
3. Drive off lot.

...and I'm sure the 3.15 gears aren't helping things any either. 3.73's + tune and you will accelerate so effortlessly from the light you won't believe it.
07BLACKGT is offline  
Old 06-10-2011, 08:42 AM
  #23  
Norm Peterson
6th Gear Member
 
Norm Peterson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: state of confusion
Posts: 7,635
Default

Originally Posted by thelastsumurai
I am a ME so i can do the math if I can find some solid reference materials for pipes and lengths. Anyone have some real (vs B/S) information on X pipes vs H pipes?
Assuming decent pipe size and bends, the instantaneous restriction provided by the mufflers may end up governing, and that's going to be some function of the actual instantaneous flow(s). Marks' 7th Edition Handbook mentions 1 psi as costing 2.5%, though that would be for 1 psi all the time instead of briefly once per crank revolution. I think what it boils down to is that unless you're operating up toward where the backpressure spikes are significant (high rpms or relatively restrictive mufflers) the differences aren't going to be very big at all. I know I found some muffler flow ratings at either 25" or 28" of water somewhere back a dozen years or so ago when I was reworking the exhaust on the Malibu, so this information is probably still available one way or another. Perhaps this crude picture of exhaust line flows vs crank angle can be of some use.





I have 315 gears on my car now and have thought about 331's it's not much of a jump, but it would get me through the gears quicker giving me better around town mpg.
Hope you like math and spreadsheets. Here's off the top of my head what's in the simulation I've been playing around with for precisely this sort of question since LBJ was in the White House. It seems to be good enough for comparison purposes that don't include the initial launch.

Acceleration = {[Gearing]x[Torque]x[Efficiency]÷[DriveTireRadius] - [TotalDrag]} / [TotalWeight]

Acceleration ≤ [SomeTractionLimit]÷[TotalWeight]

Torque = torque at rpm consistent with the mean speed of each speed increment and includes a deduction for the torque "lost" to rotational acceleration effects (consistent with the vehicle +X linear acceleration and gear reductions). A good enough basic engine torque curve for purposes of comparison can be fit to just the two normally advertised engine output data points plus a reasonable guess at the torque at 1000 rpm or thereabouts, or you could use a lookup/interpolation of an actual torque curve.

TotalDrag = drag consistent with the mean speed of each speed increment.

Incremental and total times and distances and the differences between different cases become simple bookkeeping exercises and are usually the most useful results.


Feel like you've unretired yet?


Norm

Last edited by Norm Peterson; 06-10-2011 at 08:46 AM.
Norm Peterson is offline  
Old 06-10-2011, 02:24 PM
  #24  
thelastsumurai
Thread Starter
 
thelastsumurai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: FL
Posts: 45
Default More torque

Interesting points raised in the last post. Mostly opinion mixed with technical truth. But valid points none the less. I had a 76 mustang 289 that used to come off the line at 5500 rpm and shift at 7500 rpm, not much torque there but I did very well in that class, (can't remember class or et's, yes I'm old 66) at National Dragway in Long Island. I have gotten some good advice and some dumb remarks about tuning. If you think your aftermarket tune won't void your warrantee you are sadly misten, as I was. I have read on several forums that peoples warrantees were voided by tunes.. After all, it is the opinion of the serviceing dealer that matters in these cases. I live in Ocala, FL and Ford of Ocala WILL cancel your warantee if they suspect you have tuned your car. I was having problems with my auto trans and mentioned using a tune to solve the problem and the Service Manager told me my warantee will be voided if I went ahead with it.. By the way a=f/m is the correct formula for acceleration. And yes I do feel a little unretired this has turned out to be a little more complicated than I thought it would be.. Thanks for your help.

Last edited by thelastsumurai; 06-10-2011 at 02:32 PM.
thelastsumurai is offline  
Old 06-10-2011, 02:53 PM
  #25  
Ford_Dude
5th Gear Member
 
Ford_Dude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Baytown, TX
Posts: 3,115
Default

the Service Manager was using scare tactics however if push comes to shove although legaly they can't void your warranty over a tune (Who has more laywer money?) is the real question.

the place I went to for warranty work was honest and would just say if its a non-oem part that that find caused the issue then that part won't be covered in the warranty

and on that note any thing you do if Ocala is going to use the void tactic then you are just going to have to stay stock unless you have some laywer money looking to be burned or you go to a differant dealer

any mod that lets a signifigant amount more air in at any given RPM will put you in limp-home-mode without a tune, any exhause mod will be of limited help without an intake mod, and gear change will need a reprogram (even if ford does it, it just means they do the re-tune), any change in outside tire size will require a re-tune (same as the gear mods)

under-drive pullies don't require a re-tune but could void your warranty as it might run your A/C slower and cause damage or the power steering slower and cause issues
Ford_Dude is offline  
Old 06-10-2011, 03:03 PM
  #26  
Norm Peterson
6th Gear Member
 
Norm Peterson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: state of confusion
Posts: 7,635
Default

Originally Posted by thelastsumurai
I was having problems with my auto trans and mentioned using a tune to solve the problem and the Service Manager told me my warantee will be voided if I went ahead with it.
Out of curiosity, and I'm assuming that the problem has been fixed, could there have been a TSB reflash involved?


. By the way a=f/m is the correct formula for acceleration.
For years it was just easier to work drive wheel weight % plus rear load transfer in decimal g to test the acceleration limit, so I left it all in 'a/g' format. Now I'm just too old, too lazy, and probably too stubborn to bother changing.


Norm
Norm Peterson is offline  
Old 06-10-2011, 03:05 PM
  #27  
7gtthrilla
2nd Gear Member
 
7gtthrilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 228
Default

Originally Posted by thelastsumurai
I hear about all the Horse power gains that everyone is always talking about. But the reality is that Torque is what we need every day for best MPG and street fun. I am looking to replace the factory H pipe with a X pipe (MAYBE). I suspect that ford has designed the best torque setup for the street i.e. best gas mileage. What are ever ones thoughts on this, and what can I do to get the most Torque on my '11 5.0...Without a tune...
The main thing you need to focus on is weight reduction. Not only will it make your car quicker, it will also help the handling, especially if you lower it if you haven't done so already. Good luck
7gtthrilla is offline  
Old 06-10-2011, 03:54 PM
  #28  
mapitts
3rd Gear Member
 
mapitts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Decatur AL
Posts: 823
Default

You have wasted your money. You should have gotten a Ranger with the 2.3 w/5m and called it quits. This guy is unbelievable! Have you ever stopped to notice that you seem to be getting more or less the same advice? Yet they are completely wrong and you are correct every time. Believe it or not, many of these people actually know what they are talking about. Listen to what people are telling you about what they know. Holy smoke. You absolutely cannot get from were you are now to were you want to go without a good, quality tune involved somewhere. End of story.

Last edited by mapitts; 06-10-2011 at 03:56 PM.
mapitts is offline  
Old 06-10-2011, 04:04 PM
  #29  
bigblue95z
2nd Gear Member
 
bigblue95z's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: IL
Posts: 368
Default

Originally Posted by thelastsumurai
Interesting points raised in the last post. Mostly opinion mixed with technical truth. But valid points none the less. I had a 76 mustang 289 that used to come off the line at 5500 rpm and shift at 7500 rpm, not much torque there but I did very well in that class, (can't remember class or et's, yes I'm old 66) at National Dragway in Long Island. I have gotten some good advice and some dumb remarks about tuning. If you think your aftermarket tune won't void your warrantee you are sadly misten, as I was. I have read on several forums that peoples warrantees were voided by tunes.. After all, it is the opinion of the serviceing dealer that matters in these cases. I live in Ocala, FL and Ford of Ocala WILL cancel your warantee if they suspect you have tuned your car. I was having problems with my auto trans and mentioned using a tune to solve the problem and the Service Manager told me my warantee will be voided if I went ahead with it.. By the way a=f/m is the correct formula for acceleration. And yes I do feel a little unretired this has turned out to be a little more complicated than I thought it would be.. Thanks for your help.
They can tell you that the sky will turn purple too. But it won't happen. Quit being intimidated. There are LAWS that they must follow that tells them when to honor your warranty. Look at the Moss vs. Magnuson Warranty Act.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnuso...s_Warranty_Act
Ill informed people like yourself are the ones that spread this misconception.
And your warranty is valid at more than one dealship, go to a different one that's not such a d-bag.
bigblue95z is offline  
Old 06-10-2011, 09:09 PM
  #30  
Diabolical!
5th Gear Member
 
Diabolical!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 4,491
Default

Install some go fast parts without a tune. Report back to us.
Diabolical! is offline  


Quick Reply: More Torque for Street



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:16 PM.