351 Mustang

5.8 vs vette?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-07-2007, 04:10 AM
  #21  
Force4
3rd Gear Member
 
Force4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location:
Posts: 722
Default RE: 5.8 vs vette?

a stock 351w in a fox lays prob around 215-230 at the wheels and 300-330 fpt at the wheels. and a stock351w will not run a low 13 in theqt. mid-high 13 from what ivseen, the motorsneed to be built to go fast, the stock heads and cam are very restrictive. It was built to tow, not to race lol
Force4 is offline  
Old 07-07-2007, 04:12 AM
  #22  
90mustang5.8
I ♥ Acer
 
90mustang5.8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Posts: 4,921
Default RE: 5.8 vs vette?

ORIGINAL: Force4

a stock 351w in a fox lays prob around 215-230 at the wheels and 300-330 fpt at the wheels. and a stock351w will not run a low 13 in theqt. mid-high 13 from what ivseen, the motorsneed to be built to go fast, the stock heads and cam are very restrictive. It was built to tow, not to race lol
im not saying your wrong. but here a chick runs 13.2 with a competely stock 351w, car, suspension. her only mod is drag radials. so maybe its the difference in altitude maybe?
90mustang5.8 is offline  
Old 07-07-2007, 04:51 AM
  #23  
Force4
3rd Gear Member
 
Force4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location:
Posts: 722
Default RE: 5.8 vs vette?

its called power to weight ratio. and theres no way a completly stock 351w is gonna pull a 13.2 with just radials. unlesstheres something shes not telling you i call shanagins
Force4 is offline  
Old 07-07-2007, 04:56 AM
  #24  
Force4
3rd Gear Member
 
Force4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location:
Posts: 722
Default RE: 5.8 vs vette?

These are normally a little quicker then time estimate but look, even a 2900 car (average weight of an LX) with 260 engine hp runs a 13.7, which in reality is arounda 14.0, even with 280 hp, (possibly full exhaust, and possibly mild cam) that brings you down to a 13.69 The numbers just dont add bud.
http://www.robrobinette.com/et.htm
Force4 is offline  
Old 07-07-2007, 04:58 AM
  #25  
Force4
3rd Gear Member
 
Force4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location:
Posts: 722
Default RE: 5.8 vs vette?

ok this calc thing is actually throwing tons of numbers but the calculations on a reg calc add close to the ones i posted.
Force4 is offline  
Old 07-07-2007, 09:36 AM
  #26  
4REKILLER
 
4REKILLER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 25
Default RE: 5.8 vs vette?

ORIGINAL: USMCrebel

other than the car about 1k
So you have the 351W engineoryou have to buy the engine too with that 1k? To help you we need the full story. What do you have now, before you spend any money?
4REKILLER is offline  
Old 07-07-2007, 12:56 PM
  #27  
USMCrebel
Mach I Section Moderator
Thread Starter
 
USMCrebel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: round abouts these parts
Posts: 7,140
Default RE: 5.8 vs vette?

well right now im waiting for my 1967 coupe to sell then i am going to buy the 351 mustang (everything) for 1k then I will have some room to play with, and extra 1k.
USMCrebel is offline  
Old 07-07-2007, 03:44 PM
  #28  
4REKILLER
 
4REKILLER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 25
Default RE: 5.8 vs vette?

OK not knowing all deals here what I thinkā€¦.

You are getting a 1987 Mustang XL for 1K. The engine in the car is all stock out of who knows what? So we will say 240hp with a carburetor. I would say Compression ratio is 8 to1 so I would not buy a cam until you can raise the compression to 9.5 or 10 to 1. So with no real money to buy heads let work with what you got. I would buy a used aftermarket intake and carb. Headers (used if possible) and a new exhaust Cat back system. Maybe a locale shop could hook you up or a friend. That should use up all your $ unless you buy smart!

Now if the car comes with good carb, headers and a good exhaust system then go with a power package top end kit. Heads, intake, cam, etc. but this will be more then 1K so you will have to save some more money. But with a kit you will be around 400hp and you just have to bolt it on. I have useda Top end kits before and I was very happy with it.
Now once you get back you could pull the engine and stroke the bottom end and reinstall the Top End Package for more HP.
4REKILLER is offline  
Old 07-07-2007, 11:44 PM
  #29  
Force4
3rd Gear Member
 
Force4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location:
Posts: 722
Default RE: 5.8 vs vette?

1000 for a 351 mustang??? wth?? is there something im missing here?
Force4 is offline  
Old 07-07-2007, 11:51 PM
  #30  
USMCrebel
Mach I Section Moderator
Thread Starter
 
USMCrebel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: round abouts these parts
Posts: 7,140
Default RE: 5.8 vs vette?

nope... he's got two, and he doesnt want this one anymore, so he said it could be mine for 1k....i have helped him out in the past, so he owes me.
USMCrebel is offline  


Quick Reply: 5.8 vs vette?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:50 PM.