These mods + 1/4 = ETA of??
05-11-2006, 03:50 AM
#61
2nd Gear Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location:
Posts: 207
RE: These mods + 1/4 = ETA of??
k..
when my GT (96) only had a catback exhaust (stock h pipe, stock everything else..)
I got it dyno'd at 180 and 182 rwhp (i forget the torque)
now before my clutch started going, I was getting 14.9 qtr miles off that.
with my nitrous, zex wet 75 shot,
I was dyno'd at 238 rwhp and 355 torque and got 14.1 qtr mile
I can't feel 5 or 10 rwhp difference ever.. i BARELY feel my nitrous kicking in, even though it's almost a second difference. and that's an extra 100+ torque and 60 or so hp.
also keep in mind every car is different.. how the engine was broken in, how it's maintained.. etc..
I haven't lost to a stock GT mustang yet.. and ive raced over 15 in the last year.. foxbody or sn95.. i didnt bother racing pi gt's until i got my nitrous
when my GT (96) only had a catback exhaust (stock h pipe, stock everything else..)
I got it dyno'd at 180 and 182 rwhp (i forget the torque)
now before my clutch started going, I was getting 14.9 qtr miles off that.
with my nitrous, zex wet 75 shot,
I was dyno'd at 238 rwhp and 355 torque and got 14.1 qtr mile
I can't feel 5 or 10 rwhp difference ever.. i BARELY feel my nitrous kicking in, even though it's almost a second difference. and that's an extra 100+ torque and 60 or so hp.
also keep in mind every car is different.. how the engine was broken in, how it's maintained.. etc..
I haven't lost to a stock GT mustang yet.. and ive raced over 15 in the last year.. foxbody or sn95.. i didnt bother racing pi gt's until i got my nitrous
05-11-2006, 05:48 AM
#62
4th Gear Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 1,648
RE: These mods + 1/4 = ETA of??
ORIGINAL: miglet
k..
when my GT (96) only had a catback exhaust (stock h pipe, stock everything else..)
I got it dyno'd at 180 and 182 rwhp (i forget the torque)
now before my clutch started going, I was getting 14.9 qtr miles off that.
with my nitrous, zex wet 75 shot,
I was dyno'd at 238 rwhp and 355 torque and got 14.1 qtr mile
I can't feel 5 or 10 rwhp difference ever.. i BARELY feel my nitrous kicking in, even though it's almost a second difference. and that's an extra 100+ torque and 60 or so hp.
also keep in mind every car is different.. how the engine was broken in, how it's maintained.. etc..
I haven't lost to a stock GT mustang yet.. and ive raced over 15 in the last year.. foxbody or sn95.. i didnt bother racing pi gt's until i got my nitrous
k..
when my GT (96) only had a catback exhaust (stock h pipe, stock everything else..)
I got it dyno'd at 180 and 182 rwhp (i forget the torque)
now before my clutch started going, I was getting 14.9 qtr miles off that.
with my nitrous, zex wet 75 shot,
I was dyno'd at 238 rwhp and 355 torque and got 14.1 qtr mile
I can't feel 5 or 10 rwhp difference ever.. i BARELY feel my nitrous kicking in, even though it's almost a second difference. and that's an extra 100+ torque and 60 or so hp.
also keep in mind every car is different.. how the engine was broken in, how it's maintained.. etc..
I haven't lost to a stock GT mustang yet.. and ive raced over 15 in the last year.. foxbody or sn95.. i didnt bother racing pi gt's until i got my nitrous
05-11-2006, 06:01 AM
#63
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 3,023
RE: These mods + 1/4 = ETA of??
96 - 97 and 98 all dyno the same , that "220hp!" was ford trying to push sales before the launch of the 1999 GT , who wants a 98 Gt when the 99 GT would be coming out , Ford gave buyers some incentive.
ALSO - just found a dyno sheet of a 2001 stang with a SLP LM2 cat back. It dynoed 233.74 and 276.08 ftlbs
what do they dyno stock?
ALSO - just found a dyno sheet of a 2001 stang with a SLP LM2 cat back. It dynoed 233.74 and 276.08 ftlbs
what do they dyno stock?
05-11-2006, 06:04 AM
#64
4th Gear Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 1,648
RE: These mods + 1/4 = ETA of??
ORIGINAL: SXGT
96 - 97 and 98 all dyno the same , that "220hp!" was ford trying to push sales before the launch of the 1999 GT , who wants a 98 Gt when the 99 GT would be coming out , Ford gave buyers some incentive.
96 - 97 and 98 all dyno the same , that "220hp!" was ford trying to push sales before the launch of the 1999 GT , who wants a 98 Gt when the 99 GT would be coming out , Ford gave buyers some incentive.
05-11-2006, 10:06 AM
#69
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location:
Posts: 4,333
RE: These mods + 1/4 = ETA of??
to reply to the original post, you will not even run a quarter mile time at all, until u take it to the track and find out!!!!
seriously though, i understand the point of the post. im gonna say a low 14 if you can get the tires to hook, and your a good driver. this is just what i think, probably not correct, but run it and find out, and for gods sake, post a timeslip!
good luck man.
seriously though, i understand the point of the post. im gonna say a low 14 if you can get the tires to hook, and your a good driver. this is just what i think, probably not correct, but run it and find out, and for gods sake, post a timeslip!
good luck man.
05-11-2006, 11:56 AM
#70
6th Gear Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 5,893
RE: These mods + 1/4 = ETA of??
the new edge manuals come with like 225rwhp give or take... I doubt that, that your dyno sheet is just the catback exhaust - if catback gave everyone 12rwhp alone w/that sound - everyone would have that slp...