4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang Technical discussions on 1996-2004 4.6 Liter Modular Motors (2V and 4V) within.

H&R VS EIBACH

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-12-2006, 10:07 AM
  #21  
hot wheels
4th Gear Member
 
hot wheels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: northern MI/southern LA
Posts: 1,362
Default RE: H&R VS EIBACH

everything i've read and what people on the forum have said is that the prokit is slightly less than 1.5 in. H&R supersports you need cc plates and the prokit you don't so there is some sort of differance there. um you must be the only person that got that much of a drop out of your prokit. the spring rate for the prokit is front=425-530, rear 200-300. the H&R supersports spring rate is front=700-760, rear 275-300. there's alot of differance especially in the front.
ORIGINAL: laserred38

um i got a 1.7 inch drop all the way around with the pro-kit...and my cats scrape on almost all speed bumps in the area if i go straight over (not at an angle) so as far as just LOWERING your car how is the pro-kit a waste of money? esp. considering the H&R kit is roughly the same drop?
hot wheels is offline  
Old 09-12-2006, 12:29 PM
  #22  
Mt Twigbert
4th Gear Member
 
Mt Twigbert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,067
Default RE: H&R VS EIBACH

I'd rather a cool look and give up some performance IMO..

I have Eibachs and just threw some on my brothers 98 last night.. Here are some before and after of his car..

Before


After



And here are some before and after of my car too.. Also with Eibachs..

Before


After
Mt Twigbert is offline  
Old 09-12-2006, 01:15 PM
  #23  
RedAlertlb
3rd Gear Member
 
RedAlertlb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Posts: 844
Default RE: H&R VS EIBACH

well regardles you are gaining performance because they are aftermarket springs...so i would go with the looks factor too.
RedAlertlb is offline  
Old 09-12-2006, 01:34 PM
  #24  
GodAmGT00
5th Gear Member
 
GodAmGT00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: In between Your Mom's Titties, skeet skeet..
Posts: 2,045
Default RE: H&R VS EIBACH

Well, you don't always gain performance when you lower your car...


The key to a good suspension set up is positive suspension travel.. This means, the more travel you get, the more compression you can get out of your springs/shocks.. That's why Coilovers are the best.. You're not decreasing Spring Rate or height, you're merely changed the height of the lower spring perch..

In fact, most of the time, lowering springs increase your chances of Bottoming out the Springs/shocks... That means you lose suspension "give."



JT
GodAmGT00 is offline  
Old 09-12-2006, 03:09 PM
  #25  
JimboGT01
3rd Gear Member
 
JimboGT01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Houston
Posts: 683
Default RE: H&R VS EIBACH

are sportlines too low for me since i have long tube headers?
JimboGT01 is offline  
Old 09-14-2006, 07:59 PM
  #26  
dvs_03gt
4th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
dvs_03gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,464
Default RE: H&R VS EIBACH

ive heard the sportlines will be fine with l/ts.. also MTTWIGBERT: what eibachs did u put on ure stangs?
dvs_03gt is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
baddog671
Archive - Parts For Sale
20
07-26-2016 01:20 PM
PullTab
S197 Handling Section
1
10-30-2015 08:46 AM
PB Pod
Forum Issues and Feedback
1
09-17-2015 08:32 PM
RWHEELS
S197 Handling Section
4
09-05-2015 03:42 PM
Luke9222
New Member Area
7
09-04-2015 06:46 AM



Quick Reply: H&R VS EIBACH



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:06 AM.