4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang Technical discussions on 1996-2004 4.6 Liter Modular Motors (2V and 4V) within.

*sigh* Those 6-ers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-01-2006, 01:18 AM
  #111  
stang2000
5th Gear Member
 
stang2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location:
Posts: 2,284
Default RE: *sigh* Those 6-ers


ORIGINAL: Knight Mare

ROFL at censoring only 1/2 of your profanities. :-)
ORIGINAL: stang2000

Ok I decided to chime in. I didn't even read the other 3 pages, lol.

YOUR'E ALL FU*CKED UP. Live it alone and who cares. Move on citizens. this is a TECH section not a hey this V6 mustang looks like a ricer section. WTF? CODE GET THIS FU*CKING POST OFF HERE PLEASE. Move it to OFF topic or something. GOD DAMN MOTHER ****ING **** SUCKING BITCHES. ok I feel better now, carry on.
Yeah forgot the * in the other word, lol. my bad. And it's not 1/2 it's only about 1/8 of them, lol.
stang2000 is offline  
Old 10-06-2006, 03:24 AM
  #112  
BmX
1st Gear Member
 
BmX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location:
Posts: 133
Default RE: *sigh* Those 6-ers

v6's are cool, but i hate how they sound. Nothing beats the sound of a v8 mustang! NOTHING. IMO
BmX is offline  
Old 10-06-2006, 04:23 AM
  #113  
MustangMadness7
4th Gear Member
 
MustangMadness7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,261
Default RE: *sigh* Those 6-ers

ORIGINAL: mustang232

put your silly flag down. it was me. i said that about an hour ago. i would rather have a nice looking car than a S H I T T Y one with a supercharger. guess im the only person in the world who thinks that though. so if i put a supercharger in my mustang would i get on the cover of all the mustang mags & win 1st prize at car shows???? i dont think so. it would actually have to look good also & have nice rims & be lowered. but still i guess im just a ricer for being a fan of cars that look nice instead of rubbin my dick over the engine.



ORIGINAL: jthorn9

Well I think this post has met it's end, but I will say this, I have never read a post where somebody said to get rims and a body kit over an S/C in the sixer forum, not once have I seen that. So I'm gonna raise the [sm=bs.gif] flag on this one.
I could see if his car looked bad, crap paint job, messed up rims or something(personaly id still go for performance first, no point in looking fast if you cant back it up), but his car looks fine, completely stock. But you know what, i think we can just agree to disagree and move on
MustangMadness7 is offline  
Old 10-06-2006, 04:51 AM
  #114  
JT76
Moderator
 
JT76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 4,967
Default RE: *sigh* Those 6-ers

V6<GT<Mach1<Cobra<1968 Mustang GTA S code 390(had to do it)......end of story
JT76 is offline  
Old 10-06-2006, 06:11 AM
  #115  
II 98 GT II
4th Gear Member
 
II 98 GT II's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,125
Default RE: *sigh* Those 6-ers

Soooooo i've spent the last 5 minutes trying to decide which one of those three girls posted above looked the best. [sm=jawdrop.gif]

Can't decide.


PS
For the record, all you v6 guys out there, I respect your cars, I respect you as fellow mustang owners, and I do realize that my 98 gt is not very quick at all (at least not yet). I just like cars I've never checked out the v6 section, but I plan on it now cause you guys seem pretty cool.
II 98 GT II is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
91MustangGt
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
8
06-05-2006 03:53 AM
doobs
Mustang Videos
16
07-14-2005 10:50 AM
Dejavu
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
27
05-09-2005 10:21 PM
V8 Aggie
2005-2014 Mustangs
7
04-09-2005 05:26 PM



Quick Reply: *sigh* Those 6-ers



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:36 AM.