1994 5.0 vs 1995 4.6
02-03-2007, 12:20 AM
#11
5th Gear Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 4,536
RE: 1994 5.0 vs 1995 4.6
ORIGINAL: 88foxbody_fixer
atleast the 96-98 4.6 WITH pi heads arent that slow....
atleast the 96-98 4.6 WITH pi heads arent that slow....
290 is what a N/A 3v or 4v should be on thoes mods.
02-03-2007, 01:10 AM
#12
RE: 1994 5.0 vs 1995 4.6
He said est 290
ORIGINAL: StickShifty
how did you get 290 RWHP on you mods??[&:]
290 is what a N/A 3v or 4v should be on thoes mods.
ORIGINAL: 88foxbody_fixer
atleast the 96-98 4.6 WITH pi heads arent that slow....
atleast the 96-98 4.6 WITH pi heads arent that slow....
290 is what a N/A 3v or 4v should be on thoes mods.
02-03-2007, 01:50 AM
#13
5th Gear Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 4,536
RE: 1994 5.0 vs 1995 4.6
ORIGINAL: BraMas
He said est 290
He said est 290
ORIGINAL: StickShifty
how did you get 290 RWHP on you mods??[&:]
290 is what a N/A 3v or 4v should be on thoes mods.
ORIGINAL: 88foxbody_fixer
atleast the 96-98 4.6 WITH pi heads arent that slow....
atleast the 96-98 4.6 WITH pi heads arent that slow....
290 is what a N/A 3v or 4v should be on thoes mods.
02-03-2007, 01:54 AM
#14
6th Gear Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 7,797
RE: 1994 5.0 vs 1995 4.6
ORIGINAL: StickShifty
just about 40 off
ORIGINAL: BraMas
He said est 290
He said est 290
ORIGINAL: StickShifty
how did you get 290 RWHP on you mods??[&:]
290 is what a N/A 3v or 4v should be on thoes mods.
ORIGINAL: 88foxbody_fixer
atleast the 96-98 4.6 WITH pi heads arent that slow....
atleast the 96-98 4.6 WITH pi heads arent that slow....
290 is what a N/A 3v or 4v should be on thoes mods.
02-05-2007, 06:15 PM
#15
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location:
Posts: 12
RE: 1994 5.0 vs 1995 4.6
What exactly does PI mean? Can you plz give me a little briefing between the PI and non PI parts. I got a 96 Mustang GT. Read on it some but i dont really have the exact information on exactly what the difference is. Still learning on these things. Sorry. Although i did learn a ton from these forums. Extremely helpful and interesting setups. Thanks
02-05-2007, 09:48 PM
#16
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: carlisle PA
Posts: 3,007
RE: 1994 5.0 vs 1995 4.6
the reason they put the 4.6 in the mustang and other cars instead of 5.0 is it was a more efficient design to a old 30 year old engine. granted it's an arm and leg more to mod than the 5.0, but that's because the new complex design compared to the well known design of the 5.0.
the difference of NPI and PI is that the heads/cams/intake were made different, the NPI heads have low flow and flawed port design(very small and restricting) the PI heads have higher flow and improved port design, if you set them against each other you can see the differences, the NPI is kinda teardrop shaped and the PI is just a little more larger. I dno what they changed in cams, im guessing just lobe size. The intake had different size runners to help out with the NPI intakes dropped of around what im told 4000K+ RPMS.
the difference of NPI and PI is that the heads/cams/intake were made different, the NPI heads have low flow and flawed port design(very small and restricting) the PI heads have higher flow and improved port design, if you set them against each other you can see the differences, the NPI is kinda teardrop shaped and the PI is just a little more larger. I dno what they changed in cams, im guessing just lobe size. The intake had different size runners to help out with the NPI intakes dropped of around what im told 4000K+ RPMS.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MustangForums Editor
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
3
10-09-2015 03:27 PM
Matt's 95 Stang
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
2
10-05-2015 07:16 AM
mungodrums
S550 2015-2023 Mustang
10
09-28-2015 10:54 PM
treesloth
New Member Area
4
09-28-2015 07:03 AM
