intercooler vs. aftercooler??? MOD please lock this thread!

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

06-09-2008, 12:09 PM

#11

Mustang_NTriangle

5th Gear Member

Join Date: Nov 2006

Location: MA

Posts: 2,402

RE: intercooler vs. aftercooler???

06-11-2008, 11:54 PM

#12

jigz737

Join Date: Dec 2007

Location:

Posts: 45

RE: intercooler vs. aftercooler???

or u can put a cinderblock in the back or some weights

06-12-2008, 09:20 PM

#13

RuffCat

3rd Gear Member

Thread Starter

Join Date: Jan 2008

Posts: 609

RE: intercooler vs. aftercooler???

Quote:

ORIGINAL: jigz737

or u can put a cinderblock in the back or some weights

WTF?? Your an idiot. They are talking about weight transfer. You remove weight from front and add it to the back of something you need. You don't weigh your car down more than it needs to be. BESIDES>>>> Your missing the whole point of the topic. It was focused on intercoolers vs. aftercoolers!!! My answers have been resolved. Mod please lock this thread

06-12-2008, 10:58 PM

#14

ZW99GT

6th Gear Member

Join Date: Nov 2004

Location: Tennessee

Posts: 7,797

RE: intercooler vs. aftercooler???

Quote:

ORIGINAL: RuffCat

Quote:

ORIGINAL: jigz737

or u can put a cinderblock in the back or some weights

That was a little harsh. Putting weight is a common way to make your car "transfer weight" to the rear tires. Not sure what warranted the name calling, but I guess we'll never know.

Locked