cliffyk

[/align][/align]Installed after the cats the readout from a WB sensor will be accurate however it will be an accurateslightly dampened,sort ofaveraged, reading of the AFR. This can be preferable in some circumstances. [/align][/align]I've neverdone a dyno run where they didn't use a tailpipe sniffing WB sensor, and that is definitely after the cats and then some...[/align]

FoxGT

My last s/c kit I built I went with summit's wb kit ($250)
Uses the lc-1 controller with a gauge. Cheaper than ordering innovates kit with the gauge.
I've used the aem 6in1 aswell. They're pretty cheap if you get them off of ebay. (around $240 after shipping)
both come with the controller, gauge, & sensor.

DeltaV

I have an LM-1 Wideband from innovate and love it. Its a little more expensive but it does the job. Itdatalog's and everything!

Allen2001GT

had an LM1 here as well, but have since gotten rid of it. was definitely worth the money and actually got mine for cheap in a group buy for $180.

blackstallion666

thanks guys for all the input.

HaneyMotorsport.Com

Readings after the cat are pretty accurate.....at higher rpm / load. The cats have liitle to no time to react chemically at high rpm. Idle and cruise it should read 14.7-14.6...cats working. I do not recommend this way though!!!!!!

We use the innovate and Sniper.

Casey

FoxGT

I would recommend going higher than 14.7 for cruise conditions for better fuel economy. I've ran two cars up to the 16's. The last one I did was set at 16.3:1 at cruise. Not all are the same though, some cars can go higher. I adjust up until surging then back off .2-.3