4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang Technical discussions on 1996-2004 4.6 Liter Modular Motors (2V and 4V) within.

Shorty's vs. Long Tube??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-11-2009, 04:18 PM
  #21  
ChalknCover
Sgt. Killjoy
 
ChalknCover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: DMV
Posts: 2,090
Default

Haha, nice. Do LT's, it really is the only way to go.
ChalknCover is offline  
Old 11-11-2009, 07:57 PM
  #22  
erikka.paige
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
erikka.paige's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 81
Default

for all you haters... eat ****... lol

=D

https://mustangforums.com/forum/4-6-...6-2v-na-2.html
erikka.paige is offline  
Old 11-11-2009, 08:08 PM
  #23  
Sxynerd
6th Gear Member
 
Sxynerd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 11,786
Default

You must have the intelligence of a rock.
Sxynerd is offline  
Old 11-11-2009, 08:15 PM
  #24  
0440thgt
2nd Gear Member
 
0440thgt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 431
Default

Originally Posted by erikka.paige
for all you haters... eat ****... lol

=D

https://mustangforums.com/forum/4-6-...6-2v-na-2.html
WITH SPRAY!

Seriously, WTF?
0440thgt is offline  
Old 11-11-2009, 08:26 PM
  #25  
98redstang
5th Gear Member
 
98redstang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: NJ
Posts: 2,312
Default

Originally Posted by sxynerd
You must have the intelligence of a rock.
+1000 hahaha
98redstang is offline  
Old 11-11-2009, 08:30 PM
  #26  
erikka.paige
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
erikka.paige's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 81
Default

So far, from what I can gather. The arguments I'm getting is that it's impossible and impractical. Well, obviously it's not impossible to get 400+hp out of my 4.6 2v. As far as it being impractical... idc. I'm really obsessed with making a powerful N/A motor. Money is not really an issue. I have no problem dumping $10k+ into my car at this point. If I CAN do it [and afford it] then why not?? =)
erikka.paige is offline  
Old 11-11-2009, 09:00 PM
  #27  
mrtstang
6th Gear Member
 
mrtstang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: MI
Posts: 5,884
Default

Originally Posted by erikka.paige
So far, from what I can gather. The arguments I'm getting is that it's impossible and impractical. Well, obviously it's not impossible to get 400+hp out of my 4.6 2v. As far as it being impractical... idc. I'm really obsessed with making a powerful N/A motor. Money is not really an issue. I have no problem dumping $10k+ into my car at this point. If I CAN do it [and afford it] then why not?? =)
If that's what you want, then go for it! Just don't expect to many of us to support that idea lol.
mrtstang is offline  
Old 11-11-2009, 09:11 PM
  #28  
erikka.paige
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
erikka.paige's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 81
Default

I cannot STAND the way a s/c sounds. I've NEVER heard one that doesn't annoy the **** out of me! And I think spray is such a lame excuse for hp gain. I want something that is ALWAYS there. And if I'm not gonna do a s/c or spray, then why not just stay n/a

I wasn't really asking for support or an arugment. All I was asking for was suggestions and ideas. I didn't need to be told that it's impossible. I know it's not. I didn't need to be told it's impractical. I KNOW it's not practical. I know I could get WAY more horse with spray or a s/c or a turbo. But the fact of the matter is I don't want any of that stuff. I think a high power n/a v8 is kick@ss!!
erikka.paige is offline  
Old 11-11-2009, 09:18 PM
  #29  
mrtstang
6th Gear Member
 
mrtstang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: MI
Posts: 5,884
Default

Your best bet (besides a motor swap) would probably be the new Trick Flow heads, different intake, and some pretty agressive cams.
mrtstang is offline  
Old 11-11-2009, 09:25 PM
  #30  
crash
BrandofPoop
 
crash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 3,835
Default

Originally Posted by kast1376
Not sure what kind of emissions testing is done in Oregon, but here in CA, Longtubes = auto fail.

Something to look into before you make the decision.
Anything=auto fail here in CA, ugh

Originally Posted by mrtstang
Wow...really? I gained 20 rwhp and 57 rwtq on the juice with just long tubes. I already had a MRT catted h that i swapped for a BBK shorty catted h.
Well your car is a freak!!!!!!
crash is offline  


Quick Reply: Shorty's vs. Long Tube??



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:26 PM.