GT DYNO Results
09-18-2005, 04:57 AM
#11
4th Gear Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 1,463
RE: GT DYNO Results
So with all of this: Accufab 70mm TB, BBK T.B. & Intake Spacer, FRPP Shorty Headers, Custom X-pipe, Magnaflow Hi Flow Cats, Flowmaster 2 Chamber made 238 rwhp. If a stock GT puts down 225ish, you have close to a thousand dollars in 13 horsepower. Something doesn't seem right to me there. Call me puzzled.
09-18-2005, 12:48 PM
#12
Pro. B.S. caller outer
Join Date: May 2004
Location: IL
Posts: 9,644
RE: GT DYNO Results
ORIGINAL: Dave2000GT
More loss through extra gear-tooth contact.
ORIGINAL: red2k1gt
Im still baffled as to why gears give you a lower HP read out? Can anyone explain it?
Im still baffled as to why gears give you a lower HP read out? Can anyone explain it?
09-18-2005, 03:44 PM
#13
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Nashville/Knoxville, Tennessee
Posts: 4,687
RE: GT DYNO Results
also stock is on a dynojet i think and this was a mustang dyno....
the shorties didnt do anything, may have made the power curve alittle different but no gain in power.
the shorties didnt do anything, may have made the power curve alittle different but no gain in power.
09-18-2005, 08:35 PM
#14
6th Gear Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 7,797
RE: GT DYNO Results
ORIGINAL: IWinULose
So with all of this: Accufab 70mm TB, BBK T.B. & Intake Spacer, FRPP Shorty Headers, Custom X-pipe, Magnaflow Hi Flow Cats, Flowmaster 2 Chamber made 238 rwhp. If a stock GT puts down 225ish, you have close to a thousand dollars in 13 horsepower. Something doesn't seem right to me there. Call me puzzled.
So with all of this: Accufab 70mm TB, BBK T.B. & Intake Spacer, FRPP Shorty Headers, Custom X-pipe, Magnaflow Hi Flow Cats, Flowmaster 2 Chamber made 238 rwhp. If a stock GT puts down 225ish, you have close to a thousand dollars in 13 horsepower. Something doesn't seem right to me there. Call me puzzled.
I will explain this unbelieveable phenomonon one more time
This guy who ran the shop has a Phd in engineering. He's been working on Ferrari's for years and has owned a dynojet and a mustang dyno. He says 7-8% difference depending on the car. If u take 7% of 238.6 thats 19.xxx. 238+19=257. Which is right where i need to be.
Maybe this makes more sense! Mustang dyno is 7-10% lower than dynojet!
09-18-2005, 10:35 PM
#16
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Nashville/Knoxville, Tennessee
Posts: 4,687
RE: GT DYNO Results
ORIGINAL: eZ
i thought stock gt's put out 260...
i thought stock gt's put out 260...
thats at the crank.......
so pretty much.... i think he will have about 280 at the crank (according to the mustang dyno of course)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tj@steeda
Steeda Autosports
0
09-24-2015 09:18 PM
