Emission Tune-Up ??
#1
Emission Tune-Up ??
I own an 04' GT Convert/Auto. My fuel economy has dropped off slightly over time down to the 14-16 mpg average. Recently I completed a Major 60,000 service. All Motorcraft tune-up parts, plugs/filters/T-stat/coolant, Seafoam Top end and T/Body cleaning along with hoses/belt, A-Trans & R-Diff services. I've seen a slight increase to about 16 mpg average. Have any of you changed all the 02's or EGR & Sensor or MAF and seen a MPG gain. The car has never had a CEL on.
#2
If it still has the original 02 sensors in it its time to change them out. www.rockauto.com has good prices on the Denso ones which are the same as the originals.
You really only have to do the front ones as the rear ones don't affect the engine operation, they only monitor cat condition. The fronts are a pain to swap though, its easiest to drop the front pipe down so you can get to them.
You can just clean the MAF sensor, get some MAF spray, pop the MAF off and give it a good spray clean, the tiny little element in the center is what needs to get cleaned.
Clean the EGR and PVC valve with some carb cleaner.
You really only have to do the front ones as the rear ones don't affect the engine operation, they only monitor cat condition. The fronts are a pain to swap though, its easiest to drop the front pipe down so you can get to them.
You can just clean the MAF sensor, get some MAF spray, pop the MAF off and give it a good spray clean, the tiny little element in the center is what needs to get cleaned.
Clean the EGR and PVC valve with some carb cleaner.
#3
While I don’t think it will have much of an effect on the MPG, these are also good ideas.
Last edited by petrock; 12-08-2013 at 03:22 PM.
#5
O2’s don’t really wear out. They either work or they don’t. They are not a regular maintenance item that needs to be replaced periodically. Most common failure is the heater circuit fault. If something is wrong with them a code will typically be thrown.
That is (partially) incorrect. I’ve covered this in many posts on this forum, but it doesn’t appear to be sticking. The rear O2s do monitor the efficiency of the cats, but they are also taken into account by the computer to determine fuel trim numbers.
That is (partially) incorrect. I’ve covered this in many posts on this forum, but it doesn’t appear to be sticking. The rear O2s do monitor the efficiency of the cats, but they are also taken into account by the computer to determine fuel trim numbers.
A poorly functioning but not broke O2 will still work, but it will work slowly. That leads to inefficiency.
Also no the rear oxygen sensors have ZERO to do with fuel trim. If that were in the strategy the engine would think it always needed fuel, a properly functioning car has a flat line on the rear O2 waveform. They always read lean in a car with cats.
#6
More about narrowband O2 sensors.
That is (partially) incorrect. I’ve covered this in many posts on this forum, but it doesn’t appear to be sticking. The rear O2s do monitor the efficiency of the cats, but they are also taken into account by the computer to determine fuel trim numbers.
This is also evident in the Catalyst Efficiency Monitor section of Ford's OBD System Operation Summary. The OBD summaries for the various model years can be downloaded from the Motorcraft Service Publications website.
There were some 2003 Ford models that met the Partial Zero Emission Vehicles (PZEV) standard. They used 3 sets of O2 sensors in which front (Stream 1) sensors provided the primary fuel control monitoring, the center (Stream 2) sensors monitored the cats. The rear set (Stream 3) were used to calculate a very long tern fuel value used to maximise cat efficiency. No New-Edge Mustangs used the PZEV system.
#7
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mrappe
V6 (1994-2004) Mustangs
0
09-26-2015 10:16 AM
jpplaw
4.6L V8 Technical Discussions
0
08-22-2015 09:29 PM