4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang Technical discussions on 1996-2004 4.6 Liter Modular Motors (2V and 4V) within.

PI Swap Vs. P&P (cost effectiveness for a future FI engine)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-28-2006, 07:04 PM
  #11  
aking287
2nd Gear Member
 
aking287's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location:
Posts: 168
Default RE: PI Swap Vs. P&P (cost effectiveness for a future FI engine)

ok i know p&p is port and polished can someone tell me what PI means. its probably something simple and i'll kick myself for asking
aking287 is offline  
Old 01-28-2006, 07:07 PM
  #12  
JonBeast
Moderator
 
JonBeast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location:
Posts: 8,625
Default RE: PI Swap Vs. P&P (cost effectiveness for a future FI engine)


ORIGINAL: aking287

ok i know p&p is port and polished can someone tell me what PI means. its probably something simple and i'll kick myself for asking
Performance Improved
JonBeast is offline  
Old 01-28-2006, 07:25 PM
  #13  
Acer2428
Site Mod
 
Acer2428's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Oh, Hi.... Oh?
Posts: 8,667
Default RE: PI Swap Vs. P&P (cost effectiveness for a future FI engine)


ORIGINAL: mosnet23

Hey guys, I know someone MIGHT have answered this in a LONG drawn out discussion about PI head swaps. But, I assure you my situation if different. For one I don't want a 400+BWHP car, only 300+.

Anyway, I have a friend that would sell me a basically new set of stock heads complete with everything for cheap. What I was going to do is get them P&P, then put them on my stock 96 GT and later on do a few bolt on mods with a S/C being in the (hopefully) near future.

Now my question is I am hearing that the cost of gettin' them P&P, then having the heads put on and getting it tuned could cost me $800+. I wasn't too keen on the widely sought after PI head swap cause it raises your compression too high for a S/C, even at 6 or 7psi I understand that it could give you really bad knocking and basically shorten engine life.

So if I am going to go with a S/C with 6 or 7psi in the future, which would be cheaper and more suitable for me PI head swap or P&P?
It's going to cost way more than that. The tune alone will probably be $500. Cost of chip + tune.
Acer2428 is offline  
Old 01-28-2006, 08:01 PM
  #14  
mosnet23
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
mosnet23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 151
Default RE: PI Swap Vs. P&P (cost effectiveness for a future FI engine)

Okay well what if i had got a pair of 98 head with valves and spring and all that for like basically free..........then got them P&P then had them put on with a tune. With the tune being $500 how much more would it probably be for the P&P and replacing them?
mosnet23 is offline  
Old 01-28-2006, 08:13 PM
  #15  
cammedlx
5th Gear Member
 
cammedlx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: North Cacalaky
Posts: 2,055
Default RE: PI Swap Vs. P&P (cost effectiveness for a future FI engine)

Well look around 500+ for the port work on the heads..And probaly 500+ more for the install and gaskets etc...
cammedlx is offline  
Old 01-28-2006, 08:24 PM
  #16  
DrUnkEnMaStEr69
2nd Gear Member
 
DrUnkEnMaStEr69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 204
Default RE: PI Swap Vs. P&P (cost effectiveness for a future FI engine)

I was reading somewhere that there is something u can add to lower the compression after a PI swap so it would be better for a s/c, i forget what it is called tho...anybody kno of somehting like this?
DrUnkEnMaStEr69 is offline  
Old 01-28-2006, 09:52 PM
  #17  
M1ke
4th Gear Member
 
M1ke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location:
Posts: 1,555
Default RE: PI Swap Vs. P&P (cost effectiveness for a future FI engine)

labor will probably be a grand then add 5 or 6 hundred for the port work. im not sure on supercharger install so plan on spending more for labor on that then the chip and tune
M1ke is offline  
Old 01-29-2006, 02:21 AM
  #18  
yoteehunter
3rd Gear Member
 
yoteehunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location:
Posts: 752
Default RE: PI Swap Vs. P&P (cost effectiveness for a future FI engine)

To lower the compression in a PI swap you can use "Cometic" head gaskets. The way it works is that you can get them in any thickness so in brings the head up and brings down compression. Also the gaskets are ideal for supercharging almost as goo as oringing the heads. I just woulnt get to carryed away I have no clue how it would effect the cam chains.......If they have slack? I think it would work though. Also I think stock gaskets are 39 thousands think when compressed? dont qoute that I am guessing, so you would then order gaskets that are like 59 thousands. Im guessing........just trying to give you an example......also I think for every 20 thousands .5 compression is lost.....but again I am not sure. Maybe someone with the facts will chim in and get me strait.
yoteehunter is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Gary Ugarek
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
63
12-11-2015 02:01 PM
Gary Ugarek
Archive - Parts For Sale
1
09-05-2015 09:03 PM
Calizic
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
5
08-28-2015 01:46 PM
classic69FB
Motor Swap Section
1
08-12-2015 11:58 PM



Quick Reply: PI Swap Vs. P&P (cost effectiveness for a future FI engine)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:05 AM.