GT vs EVO
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 6
From:
RE: GT vs EVO
ok, jeremoose, what the **** are you talking about???
i owned a 1990 eclipse gsx a few years back so i DO know what im talking about. and what does this thread have anything to do with KNOWING import turbo systems. you must be mistaken, because any reputable maker of even manual boost controllers doesnt offer them up for 15 bucks. maybe you can buy a used one but i can buy a used torquer 2 cam for 150 bucks, doesnt mean thats what they cost.
secondly, that dsm tuners site you reference is nothing more than a few knowledgeable people trying to save face because all the ricers get on their and claim track times they couldnt hope to run. dsm's are **** boxes and although they may run past 100k they will certainly break enough **** on the way. i KNOW first hand bud.
my car was a lightly modified awd with a 16g turbo running 17 psi on a walbro 190 lph fuel pump with a manual boost controller by turbo xs. it had a rebuilt head and everything else was junk. sure it ran in the 13s but it was a **** box. it would hit fuel cut for no reason and misfire even with a street tune and msd wires with cold ngk plugs.
they are pieces of **** and have exactly no relation to the newest gen 4g63 that utilizes almost all new technology from the intake design to variable valve timing. the two platforms are in no way comparable except for the bare block and displacement.
i owned a 1990 eclipse gsx a few years back so i DO know what im talking about. and what does this thread have anything to do with KNOWING import turbo systems. you must be mistaken, because any reputable maker of even manual boost controllers doesnt offer them up for 15 bucks. maybe you can buy a used one but i can buy a used torquer 2 cam for 150 bucks, doesnt mean thats what they cost.
secondly, that dsm tuners site you reference is nothing more than a few knowledgeable people trying to save face because all the ricers get on their and claim track times they couldnt hope to run. dsm's are **** boxes and although they may run past 100k they will certainly break enough **** on the way. i KNOW first hand bud.
my car was a lightly modified awd with a 16g turbo running 17 psi on a walbro 190 lph fuel pump with a manual boost controller by turbo xs. it had a rebuilt head and everything else was junk. sure it ran in the 13s but it was a **** box. it would hit fuel cut for no reason and misfire even with a street tune and msd wires with cold ngk plugs.
they are pieces of **** and have exactly no relation to the newest gen 4g63 that utilizes almost all new technology from the intake design to variable valve timing. the two platforms are in no way comparable except for the bare block and displacement.
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12
RE: GT vs EVO
ORIGINAL: chevy
ok, jeremoose, what the **** are you talking about???
i owned a 1990 eclipse gsx a few years back so i DO know what im talking about. and what does this thread have anything to do with KNOWING import turbo systems. you must be mistaken, because any reputable maker of even manual boost controllers doesnt offer them up for 15 bucks. maybe you can buy a used one but i can buy a used torquer 2 cam for 150 bucks, doesnt mean thats what they cost.
secondly, that dsm tuners site you reference is nothing more than a few knowledgeable people trying to save face because all the ricers get on their and claim track times they couldnt hope to run. dsm's are **** boxes and although they may run past 100k they will certainly break enough **** on the way. i KNOW first hand bud.
my car was a lightly modified awd with a 16g turbo running 17 psi on a walbro 190 lph fuel pump with a manual boost controller by turbo xs. it had a rebuilt head and everything else was junk. sure it ran in the 13s but it was a **** box. it would hit fuel cut for no reason and misfire even with a street tune and msd wires with cold ngk plugs.
they are pieces of **** and have exactly no relation to the newest gen 4g63 that utilizes almost all new technology from the intake design to variable valve timing. the two platforms are in no way comparable except for the bare block and displacement.
ok, jeremoose, what the **** are you talking about???
i owned a 1990 eclipse gsx a few years back so i DO know what im talking about. and what does this thread have anything to do with KNOWING import turbo systems. you must be mistaken, because any reputable maker of even manual boost controllers doesnt offer them up for 15 bucks. maybe you can buy a used one but i can buy a used torquer 2 cam for 150 bucks, doesnt mean thats what they cost.
secondly, that dsm tuners site you reference is nothing more than a few knowledgeable people trying to save face because all the ricers get on their and claim track times they couldnt hope to run. dsm's are **** boxes and although they may run past 100k they will certainly break enough **** on the way. i KNOW first hand bud.
my car was a lightly modified awd with a 16g turbo running 17 psi on a walbro 190 lph fuel pump with a manual boost controller by turbo xs. it had a rebuilt head and everything else was junk. sure it ran in the 13s but it was a **** box. it would hit fuel cut for no reason and misfire even with a street tune and msd wires with cold ngk plugs.
they are pieces of **** and have exactly no relation to the newest gen 4g63 that utilizes almost all new technology from the intake design to variable valve timing. the two platforms are in no way comparable except for the bare block and displacement.
This was really, cute. First off, dsmtuners is THE dsm site and doesn't support in any way ricers. Second, spouting off a few part names that you "may" have had on your '90 GSX (which just comes out now that you had one for some mysterious reason). Thirdly, no car hits fuel cut for NO reason. Oh yeah, if you had a "16g" (you didn't even mention what TYPE of 16g, whether it be a small, big, or evo III 16g) with a fuel pump and MBC, you didn't have the correct supporting mods.
Basically you don't know what your talking about and that attempt at saying you DID know what you were talking about by talking about a 90 GSX with two mods (which are the wrong first couple of mods to be doing in the first place) just made you look more foolish.
Anybody who knows DSM's knows you don't need a "reputable" MBC. "Saying" you owned one and "saying" you modded one doesn't make you know anything about them. Mine had 100k on the clock and was by no-means "lightly modded", I had no problems whatsoever with it; the only reason I got rid of mine was because it came from the coast and the undercarriage was rusted.
That all being said, I feel like an idiot for argueing like this online (with know-it-all's no less), so I'm done. Be content in your ignorance. Your Mustang IS the fastest and BEST street platform to mod from, no joke.
3rd Gear Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 811
From:
RE: GT vs EVO
ORIGINAL: Jeremoose
/giggle
This was really, cute. First off, dsmtuners is THE dsm site and doesn't support in any way ricers. Second, spouting off a few part names that you "may" have had on your '90 GSX (which just comes out now that you had one for some mysterious reason). Thirdly, no car hits fuel cut for NO reason. Oh yeah, if you had a "16g" (you didn't even mention what TYPE of 16g, whether it be a small, big, or evo III 16g) with a fuel pump and MBC, you didn't have the correct supporting mods.
Basically you don't know what your talking about and that attempt at saying you DID know what you were talking about by talking about a 90 GSX with two mods (which are the wrong first couple of mods to be doing in the first place) just made you look more foolish.
Anybody who knows DSM's knows you don't need a "reputable" MBC. "Saying" you owned one and "saying" you modded one doesn't make you know anything about them. Mine had 100k on the clock and was by no-means "lightly modded", I had no problems whatsoever with it; the only reason I got rid of mine was because it came from the coast and the undercarriage was rusted.
That all being said, I feel like an idiot for argueing like this online (with know-it-all's no less), so I'm done. Be content in your ignorance. Your Mustang IS the fastest and BEST street platform to mod from, no joke.
ORIGINAL: chevy
ok, jeremoose, what the **** are you talking about???
i owned a 1990 eclipse gsx a few years back so i DO know what im talking about. and what does this thread have anything to do with KNOWING import turbo systems. you must be mistaken, because any reputable maker of even manual boost controllers doesnt offer them up for 15 bucks. maybe you can buy a used one but i can buy a used torquer 2 cam for 150 bucks, doesnt mean thats what they cost.
secondly, that dsm tuners site you reference is nothing more than a few knowledgeable people trying to save face because all the ricers get on their and claim track times they couldnt hope to run. dsm's are **** boxes and although they may run past 100k they will certainly break enough **** on the way. i KNOW first hand bud.
my car was a lightly modified awd with a 16g turbo running 17 psi on a walbro 190 lph fuel pump with a manual boost controller by turbo xs. it had a rebuilt head and everything else was junk. sure it ran in the 13s but it was a **** box. it would hit fuel cut for no reason and misfire even with a street tune and msd wires with cold ngk plugs.
they are pieces of **** and have exactly no relation to the newest gen 4g63 that utilizes almost all new technology from the intake design to variable valve timing. the two platforms are in no way comparable except for the bare block and displacement.
ok, jeremoose, what the **** are you talking about???
i owned a 1990 eclipse gsx a few years back so i DO know what im talking about. and what does this thread have anything to do with KNOWING import turbo systems. you must be mistaken, because any reputable maker of even manual boost controllers doesnt offer them up for 15 bucks. maybe you can buy a used one but i can buy a used torquer 2 cam for 150 bucks, doesnt mean thats what they cost.
secondly, that dsm tuners site you reference is nothing more than a few knowledgeable people trying to save face because all the ricers get on their and claim track times they couldnt hope to run. dsm's are **** boxes and although they may run past 100k they will certainly break enough **** on the way. i KNOW first hand bud.
my car was a lightly modified awd with a 16g turbo running 17 psi on a walbro 190 lph fuel pump with a manual boost controller by turbo xs. it had a rebuilt head and everything else was junk. sure it ran in the 13s but it was a **** box. it would hit fuel cut for no reason and misfire even with a street tune and msd wires with cold ngk plugs.
they are pieces of **** and have exactly no relation to the newest gen 4g63 that utilizes almost all new technology from the intake design to variable valve timing. the two platforms are in no way comparable except for the bare block and displacement.
This was really, cute. First off, dsmtuners is THE dsm site and doesn't support in any way ricers. Second, spouting off a few part names that you "may" have had on your '90 GSX (which just comes out now that you had one for some mysterious reason). Thirdly, no car hits fuel cut for NO reason. Oh yeah, if you had a "16g" (you didn't even mention what TYPE of 16g, whether it be a small, big, or evo III 16g) with a fuel pump and MBC, you didn't have the correct supporting mods.
Basically you don't know what your talking about and that attempt at saying you DID know what you were talking about by talking about a 90 GSX with two mods (which are the wrong first couple of mods to be doing in the first place) just made you look more foolish.
Anybody who knows DSM's knows you don't need a "reputable" MBC. "Saying" you owned one and "saying" you modded one doesn't make you know anything about them. Mine had 100k on the clock and was by no-means "lightly modded", I had no problems whatsoever with it; the only reason I got rid of mine was because it came from the coast and the undercarriage was rusted.
That all being said, I feel like an idiot for argueing like this online (with know-it-all's no less), so I'm done. Be content in your ignorance. Your Mustang IS the fastest and BEST street platform to mod from, no joke.
2nd Gear Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 372
From:
RE: GT vs EVO
i know this was back a little ways, but...
here are the real numbers:
2003 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 5.1 13.5
2004 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 4.8 13.4
2006 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution IX MR 4.5 13.3 (MT Dec '05)
http://www.albeedigital.com/supercou...0-60times.html
here are the real numbers:
2003 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 5.1 13.5
2004 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 4.8 13.4
2006 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution IX MR 4.5 13.3 (MT Dec '05)
http://www.albeedigital.com/supercou...0-60times.html
6th Gear Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 10,551
From: Texas
RE: GT vs EVO
ORIGINAL: Jeremoose
/giggle
This was really, cute. First off, dsmtuners is THE dsm site and doesn't support in any way ricers. Second, spouting off a few part names that you "may" have had on your '90 GSX (which just comes out now that you had one for some mysterious reason). Thirdly, no car hits fuel cut for NO reason. Oh yeah, if you had a "16g" (you didn't even mention what TYPE of 16g, whether it be a small, big, or evo III 16g) with a fuel pump and MBC, you didn't have the correct supporting mods.
Basically you don't know what your talking about and that attempt at saying you DID know what you were talking about by talking about a 90 GSX with two mods (which are the wrong first couple of mods to be doing in the first place) just made you look more foolish.
Anybody who knows DSM's knows you don't need a "reputable" MBC. "Saying" you owned one and "saying" you modded one doesn't make you know anything about them. Mine had 100k on the clock and was by no-means "lightly modded", I had no problems whatsoever with it; the only reason I got rid of mine was because it came from the coast and the undercarriage was rusted.
That all being said, I feel like an idiot for argueing like this online (with know-it-all's no less), so I'm done. Be content in your ignorance. Your Mustang IS the fastest and BEST street platform to mod from, no joke.
ORIGINAL: chevy
ok, jeremoose, what the **** are you talking about???
i owned a 1990 eclipse gsx a few years back so i DO know what im talking about. and what does this thread have anything to do with KNOWING import turbo systems. you must be mistaken, because any reputable maker of even manual boost controllers doesnt offer them up for 15 bucks. maybe you can buy a used one but i can buy a used torquer 2 cam for 150 bucks, doesnt mean thats what they cost.
secondly, that dsm tuners site you reference is nothing more than a few knowledgeable people trying to save face because all the ricers get on their and claim track times they couldnt hope to run. dsm's are **** boxes and although they may run past 100k they will certainly break enough **** on the way. i KNOW first hand bud.
my car was a lightly modified awd with a 16g turbo running 17 psi on a walbro 190 lph fuel pump with a manual boost controller by turbo xs. it had a rebuilt head and everything else was junk. sure it ran in the 13s but it was a **** box. it would hit fuel cut for no reason and misfire even with a street tune and msd wires with cold ngk plugs.
they are pieces of **** and have exactly no relation to the newest gen 4g63 that utilizes almost all new technology from the intake design to variable valve timing. the two platforms are in no way comparable except for the bare block and displacement.
ok, jeremoose, what the **** are you talking about???
i owned a 1990 eclipse gsx a few years back so i DO know what im talking about. and what does this thread have anything to do with KNOWING import turbo systems. you must be mistaken, because any reputable maker of even manual boost controllers doesnt offer them up for 15 bucks. maybe you can buy a used one but i can buy a used torquer 2 cam for 150 bucks, doesnt mean thats what they cost.
secondly, that dsm tuners site you reference is nothing more than a few knowledgeable people trying to save face because all the ricers get on their and claim track times they couldnt hope to run. dsm's are **** boxes and although they may run past 100k they will certainly break enough **** on the way. i KNOW first hand bud.
my car was a lightly modified awd with a 16g turbo running 17 psi on a walbro 190 lph fuel pump with a manual boost controller by turbo xs. it had a rebuilt head and everything else was junk. sure it ran in the 13s but it was a **** box. it would hit fuel cut for no reason and misfire even with a street tune and msd wires with cold ngk plugs.
they are pieces of **** and have exactly no relation to the newest gen 4g63 that utilizes almost all new technology from the intake design to variable valve timing. the two platforms are in no way comparable except for the bare block and displacement.
This was really, cute. First off, dsmtuners is THE dsm site and doesn't support in any way ricers. Second, spouting off a few part names that you "may" have had on your '90 GSX (which just comes out now that you had one for some mysterious reason). Thirdly, no car hits fuel cut for NO reason. Oh yeah, if you had a "16g" (you didn't even mention what TYPE of 16g, whether it be a small, big, or evo III 16g) with a fuel pump and MBC, you didn't have the correct supporting mods.
Basically you don't know what your talking about and that attempt at saying you DID know what you were talking about by talking about a 90 GSX with two mods (which are the wrong first couple of mods to be doing in the first place) just made you look more foolish.
Anybody who knows DSM's knows you don't need a "reputable" MBC. "Saying" you owned one and "saying" you modded one doesn't make you know anything about them. Mine had 100k on the clock and was by no-means "lightly modded", I had no problems whatsoever with it; the only reason I got rid of mine was because it came from the coast and the undercarriage was rusted.
That all being said, I feel like an idiot for argueing like this online (with know-it-all's no less), so I'm done. Be content in your ignorance. Your Mustang IS the fastest and BEST street platform to mod from, no joke.
2nd Gear Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 262
From: Pennsylvania
RE: GT vs EVO
ORIGINAL: H0SS302
You are the dumbest dude i have ever seen in my life, your panties must be so tight up your *** its hurting your mental capacity. STFU and go to ur little "tuner" site and stop bothering people with your import knowlage, or lack of. and BTW anybody who knows anything about cars knows eagle talons are a piece of ****. i guess that explains why YOU have one.[sm=owned.gif]
ORIGINAL: Jeremoose
/giggle
This was really, cute. First off, dsmtuners is THE dsm site and doesn't support in any way ricers. Second, spouting off a few part names that you "may" have had on your '90 GSX (which just comes out now that you had one for some mysterious reason). Thirdly, no car hits fuel cut for NO reason. Oh yeah, if you had a "16g" (you didn't even mention what TYPE of 16g, whether it be a small, big, or evo III 16g) with a fuel pump and MBC, you didn't have the correct supporting mods.
Basically you don't know what your talking about and that attempt at saying you DID know what you were talking about by talking about a 90 GSX with two mods (which are the wrong first couple of mods to be doing in the first place) just made you look more foolish.
Anybody who knows DSM's knows you don't need a "reputable" MBC. "Saying" you owned one and "saying" you modded one doesn't make you know anything about them. Mine had 100k on the clock and was by no-means "lightly modded", I had no problems whatsoever with it; the only reason I got rid of mine was because it came from the coast and the undercarriage was rusted.
That all being said, I feel like an idiot for argueing like this online (with know-it-all's no less), so I'm done. Be content in your ignorance. Your Mustang IS the fastest and BEST street platform to mod from, no joke.
ORIGINAL: chevy
ok, jeremoose, what the **** are you talking about???
i owned a 1990 eclipse gsx a few years back so i DO know what im talking about. and what does this thread have anything to do with KNOWING import turbo systems. you must be mistaken, because any reputable maker of even manual boost controllers doesnt offer them up for 15 bucks. maybe you can buy a used one but i can buy a used torquer 2 cam for 150 bucks, doesnt mean thats what they cost.
secondly, that dsm tuners site you reference is nothing more than a few knowledgeable people trying to save face because all the ricers get on their and claim track times they couldnt hope to run. dsm's are **** boxes and although they may run past 100k they will certainly break enough **** on the way. i KNOW first hand bud.
my car was a lightly modified awd with a 16g turbo running 17 psi on a walbro 190 lph fuel pump with a manual boost controller by turbo xs. it had a rebuilt head and everything else was junk. sure it ran in the 13s but it was a **** box. it would hit fuel cut for no reason and misfire even with a street tune and msd wires with cold ngk plugs.
they are pieces of **** and have exactly no relation to the newest gen 4g63 that utilizes almost all new technology from the intake design to variable valve timing. the two platforms are in no way comparable except for the bare block and displacement.
ok, jeremoose, what the **** are you talking about???
i owned a 1990 eclipse gsx a few years back so i DO know what im talking about. and what does this thread have anything to do with KNOWING import turbo systems. you must be mistaken, because any reputable maker of even manual boost controllers doesnt offer them up for 15 bucks. maybe you can buy a used one but i can buy a used torquer 2 cam for 150 bucks, doesnt mean thats what they cost.
secondly, that dsm tuners site you reference is nothing more than a few knowledgeable people trying to save face because all the ricers get on their and claim track times they couldnt hope to run. dsm's are **** boxes and although they may run past 100k they will certainly break enough **** on the way. i KNOW first hand bud.
my car was a lightly modified awd with a 16g turbo running 17 psi on a walbro 190 lph fuel pump with a manual boost controller by turbo xs. it had a rebuilt head and everything else was junk. sure it ran in the 13s but it was a **** box. it would hit fuel cut for no reason and misfire even with a street tune and msd wires with cold ngk plugs.
they are pieces of **** and have exactly no relation to the newest gen 4g63 that utilizes almost all new technology from the intake design to variable valve timing. the two platforms are in no way comparable except for the bare block and displacement.
This was really, cute. First off, dsmtuners is THE dsm site and doesn't support in any way ricers. Second, spouting off a few part names that you "may" have had on your '90 GSX (which just comes out now that you had one for some mysterious reason). Thirdly, no car hits fuel cut for NO reason. Oh yeah, if you had a "16g" (you didn't even mention what TYPE of 16g, whether it be a small, big, or evo III 16g) with a fuel pump and MBC, you didn't have the correct supporting mods.
Basically you don't know what your talking about and that attempt at saying you DID know what you were talking about by talking about a 90 GSX with two mods (which are the wrong first couple of mods to be doing in the first place) just made you look more foolish.
Anybody who knows DSM's knows you don't need a "reputable" MBC. "Saying" you owned one and "saying" you modded one doesn't make you know anything about them. Mine had 100k on the clock and was by no-means "lightly modded", I had no problems whatsoever with it; the only reason I got rid of mine was because it came from the coast and the undercarriage was rusted.
That all being said, I feel like an idiot for argueing like this online (with know-it-all's no less), so I'm done. Be content in your ignorance. Your Mustang IS the fastest and BEST street platform to mod from, no joke.
anyone can shout off a bunch of random parts and claim they're this and that....personalyl i have no knowledge of those beater boxes nor do i care to so i can't say hes wrong or right...im sure there are plenty of turbo people on here that can put up a strong arguement...they just chose to care less probably....plus im at work doing nothing
if you registered here thinking you were going to "own" a bunch of mustang guys with your turbo knowlege, lack thereof as hoss stated...it probably wont happen
