4.6L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 4.6L (Modular) Mustangs built from 1996 to 2004.

Mac vs Flowmaster

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 18, 2007 | 07:57 AM
  #11  
Jaybird79's Avatar
Jaybird79
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,862
From:
Default RE: Mac vs Flowmaster

ORIGINAL: Slicktastyk Matt

Wish I could find a prochamber that is stainlessfor the longtubes [:'(]



...that will be coming friday [8D]

Hell... I'd love a stainless h-pipe for longtubes but the only h-pipe I have ever seen that's stainless is MRT and those aren't for longtubes.
I'm attempting to get as deep, grumpy, cranky, and evil sounding as possible.
You can buy the legs for the Prochamber which will help accomodate the LT headers. Also what catback would you run w/ your Prochamber? I ran the Magnapacks and didn't like it at all. If you go with Prochamber stick with Flowmaster, MAC, MRT catback, or Spintech IMO.
Old Oct 18, 2007 | 08:15 AM
  #12  
HamMach1's Avatar
HamMach1
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,083
From: Richmond, Virginia
Default RE: Mac vs Flowmaster

ORIGINAL: Jaybird79

ORIGINAL: Slicktastyk Matt

Wish I could find a prochamber that is stainlessfor the longtubes [:'(]



...that will be coming friday [8D]

Hell... I'd love a stainless h-pipe for longtubes but the only h-pipe I have ever seen that's stainless is MRT and those aren't for longtubes.
I'm attempting to get as deep, grumpy, cranky, and evil sounding as possible.
You can buy the legs for the Prochamber which will help accomodate the LT headers. Also what catback would you run w/ your Prochamber? I ran the Magnapacks and didn't like it at all. If you go with Prochamber stick with Flowmaster, MAC, MRT catback, or Spintech IMO.
Yeah dude that's what I was planning. I'm not completely set on a Prochamber but we'll see.
Old Oct 18, 2007 | 08:38 AM
  #13  
ben790450's Avatar
ben790450
I ♥ Acer
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,928
From: Colorado- 8500 feet!
Default RE: Mac vs Flowmaster

Like i've said many times before our little tiny V-8s just dont sound that good through flows. Flows sound amazing with like a built chevy 350. Thats what i had on my truck with a full 3" system but IMO Mac is the only chambered exhaust system that really does these cars justice. MAC is the only exhaust i've heard on a cobra too that didn't sound like crap imo. I have a MAC catback and MAC Off road X and my car sounds like sex. . .but that could also have something to do with the heads, cams, and long tubes[&:]
Old Oct 18, 2007 | 08:41 AM
  #14  
ben790450's Avatar
ben790450
I ♥ Acer
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,928
From: Colorado- 8500 feet!
Default RE: Mac vs Flowmaster

ORIGINAL: Slicktastyk Matt

Wish I could find a prochamber that is stainlessfor the longtubes [:'(]



...that will be coming friday [8D]

Hell... I'd love a stainless h-pipe for longtubes but the only h-pipe I have ever seen that's stainless is MRT and those aren't for longtubes.
I'm attempting to get as deep, grumpy, cranky, and evil sounding as possible.
Lol thats not possible with the little 4.6 V-8's. With a bad *** exhaust system they just sound like grumy cranky evil lepricons or something. Especially 4v's
Old Oct 18, 2007 | 09:47 AM
  #15  
HamMach1's Avatar
HamMach1
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,083
From: Richmond, Virginia
Default RE: Mac vs Flowmaster

I don't know what you're car sounds like ut mine certainly doesn't sound like a stinkin' lepricon [8D]

...more like a lepricon with diarrhea lol
Old Oct 18, 2007 | 03:51 PM
  #16  
ben790450's Avatar
ben790450
I ♥ Acer
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,928
From: Colorado- 8500 feet!
Default RE: Mac vs Flowmaster

Yeah but i have stage 2 heads and cams and long tubes with chambered mufflers. Thats about as close as a mustang will ever sound to a real muscle car. Sounds more like a miniature big block. . . if that makes any sense lol
Old Oct 18, 2007 | 04:14 PM
  #17  
HamMach1's Avatar
HamMach1
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,083
From: Richmond, Virginia
Default RE: Mac vs Flowmaster

ORIGINAL: ben790450

Yeah but i have stage 2 heads and cams and long tubes with chambered mufflers. Thats about as close as a mustang will ever sound to a real muscle car. Sounds more like a miniature big block. . . if that makes any sense lol
Oh yes.. makes perfect sense ... I hope that one day I'll be there.
Old Oct 18, 2007 | 05:37 PM
  #18  
Black_GT_02's Avatar
Black_GT_02
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,045
From: TN
Default RE: Mac vs Flowmaster

a vid of my car with flow 40 mufflers and o/r h pipe




you'll be happy with mac or flowmaster

i bought flowmaster b/c they were cheaper.
Old Oct 18, 2007 | 05:38 PM
  #19  
Black_GT_02's Avatar
Black_GT_02
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,045
From: TN
Default RE: Mac vs Flowmaster

actually i said that wrong..i bought flows because i got a good deal

but imo i like flows over mac

heres the vid: https://mustangforums.com/m_3998145/...tm.htm#4006942
Old Oct 18, 2007 | 06:17 PM
  #20  
4.6BLKGT's Avatar
4.6BLKGT
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 201
From:
Default RE: Mac vs Flowmaster

just for the record i have flows and a catted x....and it sounds amazing.....i get compliments all the time



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:23 PM.