4.6L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 4.6L (Modular) Mustangs built from 1996 to 2004.

INTERESTING T/B,PLENUM, LOWER INTAKE

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 1, 2008 | 01:45 PM
  #1  
steve0914's Avatar
steve0914
Thread Starter
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,286
From: Georgia
Default INTERESTING T/B,PLENUM, LOWER INTAKE

hey guys i ran across this article and thought i should share

99-04 t/b plenum and lower intake from professional products
Old Aug 1, 2008 | 02:22 PM
  #2  
01GT4.6's Avatar
01GT4.6
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,726
From: Slidell, Louisiana
Default RE: INTERESTING T/B,PLENUM, LOWER INTAKE

doesn't MM&FF show a huge gain with just about everything they test? I've always said that I'd like to see some real world before and after results with just an intake swap but nobody ever seems to do it. I've heard too many complaints from people that have that intake.
Old Aug 1, 2008 | 02:24 PM
  #3  
01GT4.6's Avatar
01GT4.6
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,726
From: Slidell, Louisiana
Default RE: INTERESTING T/B,PLENUM, LOWER INTAKE

not like I had to dig far, this is a current thread that I was in... read # 45
http://www.m0ddedmustangs.com/forums...50-shot-3.html swap the 0 for a o

most people rarely complain about a product they have on their car because everyone thinks they have the best stuff (that's why everyone tells you to get what they have) so when you see someone complain about a product they have and refer to it as "junk" it gets your attention. I have heard many many people complain about that intake, everywhere from no real gain to an actual power loss compared to other intakes and just poor quality such as leaks, etc.
Old Aug 1, 2008 | 02:50 PM
  #4  
cliffyk's Avatar
cliffyk
TECH SAVANT
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 10,937
From: Saint Augustine, FL
Default RE: INTERESTING T/B,PLENUM, LOWER INTAKE

I saw that article when they published it; it's about what I would expect, andit is important to keep in mind that these gainswere achievedon a highly modded(heads and cams in particular) n/a engine. [/align][/align]On a stock PI engine the intake is pretty damned good as is, the weak points being above5400 or so rpmwhere the upperplenum first, and then the TB, become problematic. Onan unmodified PI engine the gains from the Typhoon intake would beminimal as thestock intake manifold is quite capable of delivering all that the OEM PI heads and cams need. [/align][/align]This is where all the "Typhoon sucks" stories come from, people thinking thatbolting one on is going to turn their stocker into some sort of fire breathing monster...[/align]
Old Aug 1, 2008 | 02:58 PM
  #5  
steve0914's Avatar
steve0914
Thread Starter
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,286
From: Georgia
Default RE: INTERESTING T/B,PLENUM, LOWER INTAKE

hey i wasn't arguing whether it was worth it, but it was an interesting article.. t/b plenum, and lower intake gained 16hp...
Old Aug 1, 2008 | 03:36 PM
  #6  
cliffyk's Avatar
cliffyk
TECH SAVANT
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 10,937
From: Saint Augustine, FL
Default RE: INTERESTING T/B,PLENUM, LOWER INTAKE

Yeah, I realise you were not holding that article up as a torch...[/align][/align]My point was that the article is the typical vendor sponsoredadvertorial magazine article. It where the "up to xHP" claims come from. [/align][/align]They take a highly modified engine and then compare stock components to their magical stuff, and then advertise about the miraculous gains so as to convince some poor slob with a dead stock car that an intake manifold, CAI, COPs, or wehatever will add 35 HP...[/align][/align][/align]
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GimpyHSHS
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
3
Sep 18, 2015 12:27 PM
04stangman
2005-2014 Mustangs
4
Sep 17, 2015 01:45 PM
angeljoelv
SVT Forums
0
Sep 10, 2015 09:12 PM
robjh22
Suspension
0
Sep 8, 2015 12:47 PM
Luke9222
New Member Area
7
Sep 4, 2015 06:46 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:56 AM.