4.6L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 4.6L (Modular) Mustangs built from 1996 to 2004.

Trickflow 2v heads announced

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 10, 2008 | 02:24 PM
  #111  
TrickFlowTech's Avatar
TrickFlowTech
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 143
From:
Default

Ok so far this is what I can give you. On our dyno mule which is a stock bottom end 4.6L using our heads, intake and 270 Comp cams. The motor made a just a bit more than 400HP. Now keep in mind this is a dyno motor so it has an electric water pump, long tube headers and some other tid bits your average car may not have.

We are always running the dynos and as soon as get more numbers or graphs I will post them. Keep in mind this is early in testing.
Old Nov 10, 2008 | 03:15 PM
  #112  
H0SS302's Avatar
H0SS302
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 10,551
From: Texas
Default

Sounds like a winner to me..
Old Nov 10, 2008 | 03:29 PM
  #113  
teej281's Avatar
teej281
4.6L Section Moderator
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 10,286
From: South Central PA
Default

if its hitting 400hp, you are looking at 140hp more than stock!!! thats a heck of an improvement. so in reality, you are looking at around 360rwhp roughly and with a lot of room claimed for more porting, we are looking at 400rwhp 2v's in the not so distant future. If you need a car to do some on road testing and to see what an actual car would do with your heads, let me know. i would love to have a set of these things for my car!!!
Old Nov 10, 2008 | 03:42 PM
  #114  
Sash's Avatar
Sash
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 355
From: MI
Default

my 302 stroker gonna love this heads...
Old Nov 10, 2008 | 04:59 PM
  #115  
silverstang1996's Avatar
silverstang1996
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,007
From: carlisle PA
Default

Originally Posted by teej281
if its hitting 400hp, you are looking at 140hp more than stock!!! thats a heck of an improvement. so in reality, you are looking at around 360rwhp roughly and with a lot of room claimed for more porting, we are looking at 400rwhp 2v's in the not so distant future. If you need a car to do some on road testing and to see what an actual car would do with your heads, let me know. i would love to have a set of these things for my car!!!
porting won't give you 40rwhp on a 2v. If the motor has the heads, the intake manifold (which I would believe is also consisting of the TB/Plenum trickflow also offers), cams, LT headers, electric pump, and other stuff, that's pretty much a full bolt on motor. Still very good for a 2v, but if the heads are also ported, and its a full bolt on motor, they should see a good 380rwhp, so that would be quite impressive. I'm looking forward to seeing some dyno graphs in the future and seeing that power curve.
Old Nov 10, 2008 | 05:01 PM
  #116  
silverstang1996's Avatar
silverstang1996
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,007
From: carlisle PA
Default

^ also, they have already had a car to road test, with i believe 6,000 miles on the head already.
Old Nov 10, 2008 | 05:29 PM
  #117  
teej281's Avatar
teej281
4.6L Section Moderator
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 10,286
From: South Central PA
Default

dang, i guess i missed my chance then. lol but i definatly think that we will see some pretty impressive numbers with more compression, more aggressive cams, maybe some larger primary longtubes, porting of the heads, aftermarket intake manifolds, and other things. im setting my expectations high. but i bet anything that they put down will be awesome and will be more power than anything else offered out there for our cars n/a.
Old Nov 10, 2008 | 05:35 PM
  #118  
2000AZ5.0GT's Avatar
2000AZ5.0GT
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,731
Default

Originally Posted by silverstang1996
porting won't give you 40rwhp on a 2v. If the motor has the heads, the intake manifold (which I would believe is also consisting of the TB/Plenum trickflow also offers), cams, LT headers, electric pump, and other stuff, that's pretty much a full bolt on motor. Still very good for a 2v, but if the heads are also ported, and its a full bolt on motor, they should see a good 380rwhp, so that would be quite impressive. I'm looking forward to seeing some dyno graphs in the future and seeing that power curve.

They are also only using comp cams 270's, which are using only .55" of lift, and these heads are supposed to support up to .6" lift on the stock bottom end. Imagine higher compression and bigger lift on a forged bottom end, I can imagine seeing 400+rwhp on the 4.6L with a stock or a 283CI displacement.
Old Nov 10, 2008 | 06:03 PM
  #119  
Sash's Avatar
Sash
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 355
From: MI
Default

so what would be good cam for my motor with this heads, I have a VT 302 forged stroker 10.1.1 comp
Old Nov 10, 2008 | 06:06 PM
  #120  
silverstang1996's Avatar
silverstang1996
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,007
From: carlisle PA
Default

Originally Posted by 2000AZ5.0GT
They are also only using comp cams 270's, which are using only .55" of lift, and these heads are supposed to support up to .6" lift on the stock bottom end. Imagine higher compression and bigger lift on a forged bottom end, I can imagine seeing 400+rwhp on the 4.6L with a stock or a 283CI displacement.
whats the common cam/lift poeple use on 2v motors?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:12 AM.