4.6L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 4.6L (Modular) Mustangs built from 1996 to 2004.
View Poll Results: Paint vs. Cams
Hitech Cams + Springs
21
67.74%
New Paint Job
7
22.58%
Neither(Specify)
3
9.68%
Voters: 31. You may not vote on this poll

Cams vs. Paint

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 16, 2009 | 07:57 PM
  #11  
JayC's Avatar
JayC
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,860
From:
Default

[QUOTE=mvr;6031358]why??[QUOTE]

The Hitechs are a great cam for stock heads. They favor the intake side heavily. The CMS Stage II's favor the exhaust and work equally well with stock heads. But when the heads are worked on the intake side the CMS II's would be better suited IMO. I don't plan on running stock heads forever. A search of the fastest 2-valve cars will show that most are running CMS II's.
Old Mar 16, 2009 | 08:02 PM
  #12  
99 GT vert's Avatar
99 GT vert
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,760
From: Northwest Ohio (Fort Wayne Area)
Default

Paint
Old Mar 16, 2009 | 08:33 PM
  #13  
boduke0220's Avatar
boduke0220
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,183
From: Yadkin, Nc
Default

i'd do paint. my car is faster than my friends bullitt (not by much) but IMO his looks 10x's better
Old Mar 16, 2009 | 09:06 PM
  #14  
DarkShadow04's Avatar
DarkShadow04
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 720
From: New Jersey
Default

i say paint. if youre car is in that much need a paint then do it. cuz if you do the cams you'll be happy you have em but you're still going to hate youre paint. if you do youre paint youll be really happy with the way youre car looks and wish you had the cams, but youll be so happy with the paint that youll be able to get over the cams. what im trying to say is im sure your paint being eff'd up is going to bother you way more than not having cams, you gotta fix stuff before you start adding stuff, just my opinion though
Old Mar 16, 2009 | 09:45 PM
  #15  
MAD SVT's Avatar
MAD SVT
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,092
From: California
Default

i say performance over looks, i'd take a 500hp rattle can'd fox over a 350hp show car
Old Mar 16, 2009 | 10:52 PM
  #16  
blee69mustang's Avatar
blee69mustang
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,381
From: stationed in Germany
Default

if you do all the prep work you can get a decent paint job for 2500 or how ever much your getting. but if your paint is fine i'd say just go for more power. some nice heads and cam combo would be sick.
Old Mar 17, 2009 | 12:07 AM
  #17  
Tim99GT's Avatar
Tim99GT
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,700
From: Lafayette, LA
Default

lets see a pick of the car! I say paint if it is that bad off.
Old Mar 17, 2009 | 12:26 AM
  #18  
SVTeeshirt's Avatar
SVTeeshirt
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,955
From: Maryland
Default

[QUOTE=JayC;6031479][QUOTE=mvr;6031358]why??

The Hitechs are a great cam for stock heads. They favor the intake side heavily. The CMS Stage II's favor the exhaust and work equally well with stock heads. But when the heads are worked on the intake side the CMS II's would be better suited IMO. I don't plan on running stock heads forever. A search of the fastest 2-valve cars will show that most are running CMS II's.


I agree, i think a big selling point of the Hitechs is that they don't require valvesprings (stg 2s) but can rev a little higher with em, if you're getting springs anyway go CMS stg 2s.
Old Mar 17, 2009 | 08:34 AM
  #19  
silverstang1996's Avatar
silverstang1996
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,007
From: carlisle PA
Default

save more money and go S/C. I wouldn't be satisfied with just cams on a 4.6 2v for the cost of them. Or go paint because I wouldn't want any rust.
Old Mar 17, 2009 | 12:15 PM
  #20  
Roush2002's Avatar
Roush2002
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 615
From: GA
Default

I say paint. I would rather have nice power/great looks.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:56 AM.