4.6L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 4.6L (Modular) Mustangs built from 1996 to 2004.

everyone with pro-kit and c springs come in

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-03-2009, 05:42 PM
  #11  
99gtstang08
1st Gear Member
 
99gtstang08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Missouri
Posts: 60
Default

I have the Eibach Pro-kit with the iso's in. I hate how the front sits but the back is perfect for my taste. The mechanic that did my alignment said he had no problem getting it aligned. I do suggest getting some shocks and struts that are valved for the spring rate of lowering springs though. My front struts broke after a couple months, I bought Tockico D-spec shocks/struts and they completely change the way the car handled.




Last edited by 99gtstang08; 11-03-2009 at 05:48 PM.
99gtstang08 is offline  
Old 11-03-2009, 10:21 PM
  #12  
teej281
4.6L Section Moderator
 
teej281's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: South Central PA
Posts: 10,286
Default



The ride height in the back is perfect and the ride height in the front is crappy. The back seems to sag. But the back is definitely the right ride height for our cars. Now if you could get the front end down some it would be awesome!
teej281 is offline  
Old 11-03-2009, 10:34 PM
  #13  
Tim99GT
4th Gear Member
 
Tim99GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lafayette, LA
Posts: 1,700
Default

^^^ LMAO!!! add a KB to your motor and it'll sit just right LMAO!!!
Tim99GT is offline  
Old 11-03-2009, 10:44 PM
  #14  
teej281
4.6L Section Moderator
 
teej281's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: South Central PA
Posts: 10,286
Default

Hook me up with one for free and i'll do it!!! lol money for me is like eleanor...once i get it, it never sticks around long. lol
teej281 is offline  
Old 11-04-2009, 04:21 PM
  #15  
1999 GT
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
1999 GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: CT
Posts: 897
Default

haha yea tims sits perfecttt
1999 GT is offline  
Old 11-04-2009, 06:46 PM
  #16  
mvr
6th Gear Member
 
mvr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Vegas
Posts: 5,361
Default

man you know what.. if i could do it over again, again i would get HR SS's. only reason i got the prokit is i got a deal i couldnt pass up locally so i could get rid of those HR sports(looks way better with the prokit)
mvr is offline  
Old 11-04-2009, 07:15 PM
  #17  
1999 GT
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
1999 GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: CT
Posts: 897
Default

^^ oh really? how come tims sits so nice...but teej's sits a little high in the front (no pun intended) is the kb really that heavy lol
1999 GT is offline  
Old 11-04-2009, 08:13 PM
  #18  
Tim99GT
4th Gear Member
 
Tim99GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lafayette, LA
Posts: 1,700
Default

^^ yea it is.. the 2.1l weighted in right around 45-50lbs
the 2.8H is significantly heavier.. prolly 65-70lbs
Tim99GT is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GimpyHSHS
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
19
12-19-2023 01:12 PM
CS2007
General Tech
8
06-25-2019 09:45 PM
Gene K
S197 Handling Section
1
10-21-2015 11:37 PM
mungodrums
S550 2015-2023 Mustang
10
09-28-2015 10:54 PM



Quick Reply: everyone with pro-kit and c springs come in



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:37 AM.