4.6L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 4.6L (Modular) Mustangs built from 1996 to 2004.

LCAs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 2, 2009 | 11:59 AM
  #41  
Jazzer The Cat's Avatar
Jazzer The Cat
Retired Moderator
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,235
From: SF Bay Area
Default

word
Old Dec 2, 2009 | 12:10 PM
  #42  
teej281's Avatar
teej281
4.6L Section Moderator
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 10,286
From: South Central PA
Default

So without coilovers you need a more stiff spring but when using a coilover setup you do not need as stiff of a spring??? I am somewhat confused. lol
Old Dec 2, 2009 | 01:06 PM
  #43  
jmac72187's Avatar
jmac72187
corner carver
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,371
From: New England
Default

Originally Posted by teej281
So without coilovers you need a more stiff spring but when using a coilover setup you do not need as stiff of a spring??? I am somewhat confused. lol
Because a coil-over relocates the spring, the spring becomes more effective. Since the spring is more effective, you don't need as high of a spring rate to achieve the same wheel rate as if you were running a stock location spring.
Old Dec 2, 2009 | 01:12 PM
  #44  
teej281's Avatar
teej281
4.6L Section Moderator
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 10,286
From: South Central PA
Default

But with a stock style spring, you need a heavier spring rate to replicate the stress the upper control arm bind caused???
Old Dec 2, 2009 | 01:25 PM
  #45  
stangalator's Avatar
stangalator
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,306
From: New York
Default

Originally Posted by jmac72187
Yes you can. A torque arm allows you to remove the UCA's hence the name 3 link.

Don't give out bad info.
Sorry, just getting into suspension work recently. The notion of removing half of your control arms in the rear threw me a curve ball, thats all...

So adj. shpecial uppers < phb/WL and TA, is this just for some cases or just drag racing?
Old Dec 2, 2009 | 02:09 PM
  #46  
jmac72187's Avatar
jmac72187
corner carver
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,371
From: New England
Default

Originally Posted by teej281
But with a stock style spring, you need a heavier spring rate to replicate the stress the upper control arm bind caused???
Basically. MM has two different spring rates for TA springs. Talk to them about which one you should run. They lower the car slightly but with the adjustable LCA's you will be able to set the height and corner weights anyway.

Originally Posted by stangalator
Sorry, just getting into suspension work recently. The notion of removing half of your control arms in the rear threw me a curve ball, thats all...

So adj. shpecial uppers < phb/WL and TA, is this just for some cases or just drag racing?
It depends on what you want. A PHB/TA or WL/TA is much better than our 4-link for cornering. For drag racing you could use this set up but you could go for a much cheaper set up using adjustable UCA's. The 4-link is fine for drag racing if you upgrade the control arms alla round.
Old Dec 2, 2009 | 02:20 PM
  #47  
teej281's Avatar
teej281
4.6L Section Moderator
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 10,286
From: South Central PA
Default

But since i already have adjustable shocks and struts, i think im gonna do coilovers...especially if they offer better ride quality than stock style suspension. Plus it will save me money on buying the adjustable ride height lower control arms...which equates to almost a hundred bones which i could put into my coilover kit and then have the ultimate adjustability and ride quality.
Old Dec 2, 2009 | 03:24 PM
  #48  
jmac72187's Avatar
jmac72187
corner carver
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,371
From: New England
Default

You will have to find a rear coil-over kit for those shocks/struts. Also make sure that they are properly valved for a high enough spring rate. Matching the valving of the shocks/struts with the spring rate is important.
Old Dec 2, 2009 | 07:18 PM
  #49  
mustangmancp's Avatar
mustangmancp
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,503
From: Missouri
Default

I love threads like this...

Do convertibles need FLSFCs?? Thats the only thing im really confused about.
Old Dec 2, 2009 | 08:07 PM
  #50  
teej281's Avatar
teej281
4.6L Section Moderator
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 10,286
From: South Central PA
Default

Yea, convertibles have really flimsy subframe connectors factory but they dont really do anything. So you should probably get MM FLSFC's. Any of our year stangs should get FLSFC's.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:32 PM.