4.6L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 4.6L (Modular) Mustangs built from 1996 to 2004.

Purchasing Question - 2002 GT vs 2003 GT vs 2005 GT

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-05-2010, 07:25 PM
  #11  
smitty2919
5th Gear Member
 
smitty2919's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: KY, was MA
Posts: 2,797
Default

Originally Posted by lilcrate
I don't consider my car "beat" on at all and I would buy my car if someone else owned it and they treated it the same way I do. I would save hella cash, and don't think people who drive stock mustangs don't drive them hard just because they are stock.
well i dont know if your car is "beat" on either, i dont know your driving style. but for people to lay into the gas and do burnouts all over the place and drive it like a racecar...then i would call that beating on it. all the while not doing good maintenance on it.

now having some "spirited driving" every now and then is assumed in these kinds of cars.

but opinions are like a$$holes and everyone has one when it comes to stuff like this. im just saying to do a little research on the car is all if if its modded and who your buying it from. most times a teen will drive it harder than a 40+ year old guy (assuming the 40+ year old is no ex racer of some sort lol)
smitty2919 is offline  
Old 01-06-2010, 12:39 AM
  #12  
02Stang89
2nd Gear Member
 
02Stang89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: La Crosse, WI
Posts: 177
Default

Id go option 2. Black is sexy, and hard to keep clean but still! Low miles too. Just me 2 cents
02Stang89 is offline  
Old 01-06-2010, 01:12 AM
  #13  
H0SS302
6th Gear Member
 
H0SS302's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 10,551
Default

Your freakin crazy if you dont get the 2011(if you have money for it). Even if there is issues with the motor/tranny, Ford will issue TSBs and you will be covered. its an all around better car that will absolutely rape any stock GT Ford has ever put out.
H0SS302 is offline  
Old 01-06-2010, 01:40 AM
  #14  
2000BlkGtConvgobucks
1st Gear Member
 
2000BlkGtConvgobucks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: OHIO
Posts: 58
Default

/\ +1 to that guy. I would buy the 02 and slap a supercharger on it. It would cost less than the 05 and it would be a really fun car to drive
2000BlkGtConvgobucks is offline  
Old 01-06-2010, 10:16 AM
  #15  
jprog7
Thread Starter
 
jprog7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: CT
Posts: 5
Default Thanks

Thanks for the input guys. I was leaning against the 05 just because of the mileage.

Sure the 5.0 powered car sounds amazing. I also know Ford is good for issuing TSB's. However, the less the car is in the shop the better. While it's there, there is always the risk of damage to it. Sure there's always the chance while driving it to, but then it's in my hands, and I'll take the responsibility for that. Having someone else scratch my baby will **** me off!

I'll wait for the new motor and tranny to prove themselves first. Also, if I buy a SN-95, I won't have to take a massive depreciation hit like I would by buying a new car also. Also property taxes and insurance are less with the older GT. Bottom line is I really like the New Edge body style.

I want to buy it to enjoy, I was originally thinking of buying this for the short term, but hey if I like it, I may decide to keep it for a few years?

I definitely plan on doing some spirited driving, and will definitely row the gears everyday! Like I said, I'd love to screw around with an autocross or two to have some fun.
jprog7 is offline  
Old 01-06-2010, 10:35 AM
  #16  
teej281
4.6L Section Moderator
 
teej281's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: South Central PA
Posts: 10,286
Default

I'd go in this order...05, 03, 02. The t3650 was a new tranny for 02 and they sucked. 03's seem to have better luck with them. And you said autocross...the 05's come stock with a panhard bar so they should handle better with minor upgrades to the suspension than a new edge would. Plus you usually dont find that high of mileage on a car unless its all highway driving which is less stressful on a car than in town driving. So i'd so 05, then 03, then the 02 as the last choice.
teej281 is offline  
Old 01-06-2010, 11:48 AM
  #17  
Eagle2000GT
4th Gear Member
 
Eagle2000GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Shelbyville, Indiana
Posts: 1,088
Default

I'd go with option 2. I don't care for shaker hoods and 18" wheels. But that's just me. It was driven only around 5,000 miles per year so it would be my guess that it was garaged during the winter.

A couple of years ago I looked into trading my stock and very clean 2000 GT for a very clean 2005 GT. For the price difference that they wanted I was able to get a supercharger and other mods. I would much rather drive a 370 rwhp 2000 GT than a 260 rwhp 2005 GT.
Eagle2000GT is offline  
Old 01-06-2010, 12:05 PM
  #18  
teej281
4.6L Section Moderator
 
teej281's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: South Central PA
Posts: 10,286
Default

02's have a lot of TSB's out that might not have been fixed. Just saying...cus i own one that most of them werent done to. And it sucks. Most of the 03's ive seen have most of the things corrected from factory.
teej281 is offline  
Old 01-06-2010, 04:15 PM
  #19  
MCxQubed
5th Gear Member
 
MCxQubed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,173
Default

Originally Posted by lilcrate
I would do option 1 for a short term toy, maybe even if it was for long term. Option 2 only for long term...
+1...
MCxQubed is offline  
Old 01-06-2010, 04:20 PM
  #20  
smashten
1st Gear Member
 
smashten's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: VA
Posts: 130
Default

+1 on stock doesn't equal good shape. Bought mine stock from a girl I dont think beat it, but now i know she didn't change the oil enough.
smashten is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
raleigh05GTO
New Member Area
5
09-04-2015 07:09 AM
cbird1177711
2005-2014 Mustangs
3
09-02-2015 08:51 PM
tj@steeda
Steeda Autosports
0
09-02-2015 08:40 PM
cbird1177711
2005-2014 Mustangs
0
09-02-2015 04:12 PM



Quick Reply: Purchasing Question - 2002 GT vs 2003 GT vs 2005 GT



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:33 PM.