4.6L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 4.6L (Modular) Mustangs built from 1996 to 2004.

T-Trim Numbers In!!!!! The Good, the Bad, and The Ugly

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-22-2010, 04:51 PM
  #61  
boduke0220
6th Gear Member
 
boduke0220's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Yadkin, Nc
Posts: 5,183
Default

Im thinking Hangwire vs 049er here soon!
boduke0220 is offline  
Old 05-22-2010, 04:56 PM
  #62  
GTRACER88
5th Gear Member
 
GTRACER88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 2,112
Default

Numbers still seem high to me.. especially with N/A cams. None the less nice car. Sounds mean too!!!!
GTRACER88 is offline  
Old 05-22-2010, 06:32 PM
  #63  
Mustang_NTriangle
5th Gear Member
 
Mustang_NTriangle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: MA
Posts: 2,402
Default

Originally Posted by Kerns
Only problem I see with the numbers is he essentially picked up 170RWHP on 7-8PSI which means he is getting about 21.3-24.2RWHP per lb of boost... Most people say you get roughly 15RWHP per lb of boost.
I was thinking the same thing, i am running my sig with 15 lbs of boost at 470 and 430 but again this dyno is on the conversative side.
Mustang_NTriangle is offline  
Old 05-22-2010, 07:08 PM
  #64  
0949er
4th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
0949er's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NC
Posts: 1,909
Default

comparing the v2 s-trim and v1 t-rim is like comparing apples and oranges....

I mean this isn't a cheap blower, and I have a lot of supporting MODs. I have stayed on the same dyno for 2 years now and it was never questioned on its accuracy before

Last edited by 0949er; 05-22-2010 at 07:12 PM.
0949er is offline  
Old 05-22-2010, 08:43 PM
  #65  
mrtstang
6th Gear Member
 
mrtstang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: MI
Posts: 5,884
Default

Originally Posted by GTRACER88
Numbers still seem high to me.. especially with N/A cams. None the less nice car. Sounds mean too!!!!
Actually, those Comp stage 2's make for pretty decent blower cams as well. I do agree that those numbers are unusually high though.
mrtstang is offline  
Old 05-23-2010, 10:46 PM
  #66  
MustangMan00
5th Gear Member
 
MustangMan00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: MD, but NC for school
Posts: 2,374
Default

apparently kerns really wants me and 09 to race huh? haha I'd like to see it too once both have cooled considerably and its at the track haha

But we are swapping pulleys he has a 3.33 and i have a 3.60, I'm getting his powerpipe as well(which I just mocked up and its a very tight fit)

But I think after pulley swaps he should be around 420-430 and I should be like 410-420....those are my guesses but only time will tell.
MustangMan00 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
djbigskrilla
2005-2014 Mustangs
24
09-20-2022 01:04 AM
Diode Dynamics
Vendor For Sale / Group Buy Classifieds
28
05-26-2022 12:02 PM
Faolan65
New Member Area
2
08-27-2015 06:40 AM
Faolan65
Arizona Regional Chapter
0
08-25-2015 09:24 AM
Stilz
New Member Area
3
08-19-2015 06:17 AM



Quick Reply: T-Trim Numbers In!!!!! The Good, the Bad, and The Ugly



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:58 PM.