4.6L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 4.6L (Modular) Mustangs built from 1996 to 2004.

70 or 75 TB?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-29-2010, 01:05 PM
  #21  
cliffyk
TECH SAVANT
 
cliffyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Saint Augustine, FL
Posts: 10,938
Default

It true--although a toilet's operating cycle is manually initiated, the remainder of the cycle is handled by a fully automated, hydraulically powered, negative feedback closed loop flow control system--and of course gravity...

There's nothing like that in a lousy throttle body--at least not in ours, those fly-by-wire things are kind of scary looking...
cliffyk is offline  
Old 06-29-2010, 03:41 PM
  #22  
lizzyfan
Underboss
 
lizzyfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Helaware
Posts: 20,273
Default

Originally Posted by cliffyk
It true--although a toilet's operating cycle is manually initiated, the remainder of the cycle is handled by a fully automated, hydraulically powered, negative feedback closed loop flow control system--and of course gravity...
lizzyfan is offline  
Old 06-29-2010, 06:41 PM
  #23  
jt02gt
2nd Gear Member
 
jt02gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 187
Default Engine degreaser?

delete........
jt02gt is offline  
Old 06-29-2010, 07:14 PM
  #24  
school boy
5th Gear Member
 
school boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: kentucky
Posts: 2,241
Default

just find a combo for sale used for a good price. 70, 75 or 78 just get one
school boy is offline  
Old 06-30-2010, 12:19 AM
  #25  
tdcalhoun89
4th Gear Member
 
tdcalhoun89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,977
Default

Originally Posted by school boy
just find a combo for sale used for a good price. 70, 75 or 78 just get one
or find a better place to spend your money (gears, f/i, suspension, whatever you fancy)
tdcalhoun89 is offline  
Old 07-01-2010, 08:55 AM
  #26  
stangalator
4th Gear Member
 
stangalator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 1,306
Default

anything over 70mm will be a waste. Once you have a plenum and a 70mm that section wont be the bottle neck of your intake system and you will be at WOT earlier then your flooring it. You will be moving as much air as the engine can suck in even with the TB at say 3/4 open so the rest of the range will be wasted in a way. One way to look at it is that under normal driving you will need very little pedal movement to get going.

If you dont want to S/C it you should get a 70mm, the velocity charge of the air (momentum basically of the air) will be lost with a large TB. Think about a massive TB with the same volumetric flow rate you will have slower moving air.

With your exhaust work, you could see some gains with a tb and plenum, make sure to tune it though. A wideband & tuner will be huge, more so then a TB and plenum. I mean i trap at near 105 with only a 70mm accufab TB on my intake side beside a drop in K&N filter.



EDIT:
Originally Posted by cliffyk
When running naturally aspirated, with our 46L 2V engines, a 70mm TB (coupled with an after market upper plenum) provides an optimal combination of air flow and charge velocity.

A 75mm TB will not flow any additional air, as the plenum is the limiting factor--it won't hurt anything so much as to be noticeable (a very slight decrease in charge velocity), but it won't help either--again this is when running n/a.

BBKs 78mm TB/plenum combo is gross overkill if running n/a and would likely cause a large enough decrease in charge velocity, at WOT and lower/mid rpms, to be quite noticeable.

Here's some good info from Accufab, introduced and annotated by your's truly...
i didn't see you posted this, basically the same thing you said haha

Good luck on your build!

Last edited by stangalator; 07-01-2010 at 09:00 AM.
stangalator is offline  




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:33 AM.