View Poll Results: What you like better?
Magnapack with o/r H
20
54.05%
Magnapack with o/r X
17
45.95%
Voters: 37. You may not vote on this poll
Help settle a debate!
08-25-2010, 10:14 AM
#41
"It also helps quiet down the exhaust, resulting in a mellower, less raspy tone."
"This “laminar” flowing gas is much quieter than tumbling gas, resulting in an exhaust tone up to 8 decibels quieter than a traditional H-pipe."
You need to read that article better before you post it...look at the two quotes above. What a crock that article is. Plus, youre talking on a h/c/i setup there pal...not a bolt-on car. If you have a car making peak torque where we make peak power, there is a lot more going into that setup than just exhaust. Plus 5.0's respond better to exhaust anyways and that was a bolt-on system that was 2.5" tubing. The exhaust setup that made the same power as open headers was using a stepped x pipe that exited at 3" and then went up to 3.5" and back down to 3"...that is nowhere close to a fair comparison. And the comments on how x's reduce rasp and are quieter than h pipes...COME ON PEOPLE!!! That article is super retarded and not valid at all here especially since that article is talking about a 5.0 first off, and it has a lot more motor work than just bolt-on's.
"This “laminar” flowing gas is much quieter than tumbling gas, resulting in an exhaust tone up to 8 decibels quieter than a traditional H-pipe."
You need to read that article better before you post it...look at the two quotes above. What a crock that article is. Plus, youre talking on a h/c/i setup there pal...not a bolt-on car. If you have a car making peak torque where we make peak power, there is a lot more going into that setup than just exhaust. Plus 5.0's respond better to exhaust anyways and that was a bolt-on system that was 2.5" tubing. The exhaust setup that made the same power as open headers was using a stepped x pipe that exited at 3" and then went up to 3.5" and back down to 3"...that is nowhere close to a fair comparison. And the comments on how x's reduce rasp and are quieter than h pipes...COME ON PEOPLE!!! That article is super retarded and not valid at all here especially since that article is talking about a 5.0 first off, and it has a lot more motor work than just bolt-on's.
08-25-2010, 10:15 AM
#42
6th Gear Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 6,028
lmao whatever. run what the hell you want to but if you research many different sites on it you will see the x outperforms the h 9 times out of 10 alot of ppl know that but they want chime in but its all good. pulses bouncing off eachother or pulses pulling eachother through which do you think will flow better use simple logic instead of the thread expert. whatever!
PLEASE tell me what it's like in La-La Land!! Is the sky still blue? Is grass still green? Whats it like Daddy?!
08-25-2010, 10:21 AM
#43
4th Gear Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 1,452
to end it h pipes are a godsend and every performance car should run them no matter what hell they should cease the production of x pipes period bc the h pipe is just that awsome. hell even the cars of nascar need to ****** those x pipes off and run h pipes. im such a fool for runnin an x on my car thank you guys for your wisdom im going to take the x off my car right now so i can go get an h pipe thank you guys
08-25-2010, 10:24 AM
#45
6th Gear Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 6,028
to end it h pipes are a godsend and every performance car should run them no matter what hell they should cease the production of x pipes period bc the h pipe is just that awsome. hell even the cars of nascar need to ****** those x pipes off and run h pipes. im such a fool for runnin an x on my car thank you guys for your wisdom im going to take the x off my car right now so i can go get an h pipe thank you guys
08-25-2010, 10:24 AM
#46
4th Gear Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 1,452
the same thing has been debated on here many times b4 and I say smthn similar to what others have said many times b4 and ppl just decide to jump down my throat for some odd reason. and what is "ban-land"?
08-25-2010, 10:27 AM
#49
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Missouri
Posts: 4,503
Yea def didn't think it'd get this heated. No need for that language sir...tisk tisk...you should know better then that.
This is a SOUND preference thread guys...not performance..lets read a lil here people...i know you all can do that. At least i thought you guys could lol...
This is a SOUND preference thread guys...not performance..lets read a lil here people...i know you all can do that. At least i thought you guys could lol...
