When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
It seems like a lot of people think Paxton are a little so-so with little boost but once you start getting into higher boost that's when they really shine. But the fact is the same versatile. But peak boost at redline? For real?
It seems like a lot of people think Paxton are a little so-so with little boost but once you start getting into higher boost that's when they really shine. But the fact is the same versatile. But peak boost at redline? For real?
the faster it spins the more boost it makes just like any other centrifugal. it's a belt drive turbo.
I often hear that centrifugals lag. Maybe i'm just plain missing it, but i don't see how. When i think of lag i think of a delayed throttle response. So since it's belt driven wouldn't there be no lag? I realize no boost is being made at lower rpm, but response on the throttle should not be affected right?
I often hear that centrifugals lag. Maybe i'm just plain missing it, but i don't see how. When i think of lag i think of a delayed throttle response. So since it's belt driven wouldn't there be no lag? I realize no boost is being made at lower rpm, but response on the throttle should not be affected right?
compared to an NA engine they dont. compared to a positive displacement blower everything lags and turbos only lag if they are setup wrong. the reason is design. centrifugals and turbos makes more boost the faster they spin. because a centrifugal is restricted by the engine directly on how fast it spins it will lag compared to a turbo. plus they operate in vacuum at low RPMs (under 2500 from my experiance)