Well now i've gone and done it...

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

06-12-2013, 11:28 AM

#131

uberstang1

Chupacabra

Join Date: Jul 2004

Location: wilkes-barre PA

Posts: 9,621

5 hour dyno run that sucks

06-12-2013, 11:55 AM

#132

BlackMage

5th Gear Member

Thread Starter

Join Date: Oct 2003

Location: Northern Wisconsin

Posts: 2,010

its what i get for wanting to live in the boonies. My brother lives a few miles from a decent shop in milwaukee, so Ill just have to make a weekend trip down to see him sometime.

06-12-2013, 12:16 PM

#133

uberstang1

Chupacabra

Join Date: Jul 2004

Location: wilkes-barre PA

Posts: 9,621

Thats one good thing about the east coast, the performance and racing scene is HUGE, all the big name tuners are on the coast.

06-12-2013, 12:24 PM

#134

JC316

4th Gear Member

Join Date: May 2009

Location: DFW, TX

Posts: 1,925

Quote:

Originally Posted by uberstang1

Mine ran fine with the gt thne aswell, but without a tunethe cars are running at 200rwhp

I wouldn't call that accurate. A friend did the same swap with the GT tune and was putting down 278 to the wheels. The GT tune is pretty close.

06-12-2013, 08:45 PM

#135

jeh4269

3rd Gear Member

Join Date: Jul 2010

Location: Pennsylvania

Posts: 704

Mine put down 281 rwhp on the GT tune but was running rich,which was a surprise bc everyone said I was running lean.Either way I would get a tune as soon as you can.The 281 rwhp was after a generic tune was uploaded with an SCT XCAL3.