Manual vs. Automatic
02-03-2007, 05:31 PM
#21
3rd Gear Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location:
Posts: 802
RE: Manual vs. Automatic
OK I am sorry for throwing another wrench in the mix but here are a few additional options on the horizon.
First B&M will at some point (when they get off their @ss) release the sequential shifter for the Automatic transmission which will give you the autostick capabilities.
Next if you get a Manual several reputable companies are selling modified T56 6 speed transmission kits for the car, which is pretty awesome.
And now for those who have the deep pockets, SHM has a Sequential Manual 6 Speed transmission kit, with a hydrolic clutch, this is one of the best and as such most expensive ways to go. There is no possibility of missing a shift, shifting is remarkably faster and smoother then the other Manual options and it is good for both street and strip use. SMG style transmissions are becoming more and more common on racing circuits because of this fact. The catch, prepare to drop $12,000 - $15,000 for this puppy. If you are seriously looking for the best thought, there is no other way in all th research I have done. That said, I am buying one hopefully as a birthday gift to me next Oct.
First B&M will at some point (when they get off their @ss) release the sequential shifter for the Automatic transmission which will give you the autostick capabilities.
Next if you get a Manual several reputable companies are selling modified T56 6 speed transmission kits for the car, which is pretty awesome.
And now for those who have the deep pockets, SHM has a Sequential Manual 6 Speed transmission kit, with a hydrolic clutch, this is one of the best and as such most expensive ways to go. There is no possibility of missing a shift, shifting is remarkably faster and smoother then the other Manual options and it is good for both street and strip use. SMG style transmissions are becoming more and more common on racing circuits because of this fact. The catch, prepare to drop $12,000 - $15,000 for this puppy. If you are seriously looking for the best thought, there is no other way in all th research I have done. That said, I am buying one hopefully as a birthday gift to me next Oct.
02-18-2007, 11:18 PM
#22
3rd Gear Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Psychiatric Unit
Posts: 523
RE: Manual vs. Automatic
For me, the choice was obvious....automatic! Why? Because I have had plenty of manual trans vehicles over the years and I am tired of rowing through traffic as a daily driver (which the car will be). Also, I know you can hook up a nice remote start to an auto equipped vehicle, not sure if you can a manual. Once you have had a nice two-way remote start, you really don't want to be without one again...
02-21-2007, 10:31 PM
#23
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location:
Posts: 71
RE: Manual vs. Automatic
I agree. My last mustang was a manual and it is fun to shift but in traffic it is a pain in a--. I just had a tune put in mine and while they installed the tune they did a sweet job tuning the tranny. It shifts real quick without being harsh.
02-21-2007, 10:45 PM
#24
2nd Gear Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Portland Oregon
Posts: 370
RE: Manual vs. Automatic
Same here my last Mustang was a 96 GT and in traffic it was a pain in the butt. When I drove the auto 06 I was hooked it is fast and in the city it is easy to drive. Now if I was twenty years younger I would of gone with a stick.
02-23-2007, 03:14 AM
#25
2nd Gear Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location:
Posts: 179
RE: Manual vs. Automatic
Automatic here!
But the catch is i dont kno how to drive a stick....lol
and i disagree when peoepl say manuals are more bcuz i have a hell of a time in my car....
but then again ive never driven a stick
But the catch is i dont kno how to drive a stick....lol
and i disagree when peoepl say manuals are more bcuz i have a hell of a time in my car....
but then again ive never driven a stick
02-23-2007, 03:34 AM
#26
4th Gear Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,138
RE: Manual vs. Automatic
ORIGINAL: 05 Ricky
Thats the funniest thing I heard all day My car stock went 13.40's at 102/103 and my buddys auto runs 13.80's to 13.90's at 101. Both bone stock my manual vrs his auto, both coupes and 2005 models, same options.
ORIGINAL: Johnmichael
Personal preference prevails. However, stock for stock, the autos are running faster in the 1/4.
Personal preference prevails. However, stock for stock, the autos are running faster in the 1/4.
My car stock went 13.40's at 102/103 and my buddys auto runs 13.80's to 13.90's at 101. Both bone stock my manual vrs his auto, both coupes and 2005 models, same options.
stock vs. stock the manual is faster (unless the driver doesn't know how to shift).
02-25-2007, 01:07 AM
#28
3rd Gear Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location:
Posts: 790
RE: Manual vs. Automatic
Still an everyday driver, i cant decide what i want. ill be in rush hour everyday, but id stil want the fun. Id love my auto now, and a manual just seems like so much more work, and more fun. But i guess im just an auto kind of guy. -Jon
03-02-2007, 12:34 PM
#29
3rd Gear Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location:
Posts: 697
RE: Manual vs. Automatic
I got the Auto bc I work 8 miles away from my house and it takes me 45 mins to get there. Thats what you get for living in one of the 5 boroughs of NY. Love the AT though, and i havnt even tuned it yet.
03-02-2007, 12:39 PM
#30
2nd Gear Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location:
Posts: 418
RE: Manual vs. Automatic
ORIGINAL: FLA Dreadhead
Automatic here!
But the catch is i dont kno how to drive a stick....lol
and i disagree when peoepl say manuals are more bcuz i have a hell of a time in my car....
but then again ive never driven a stick
Automatic here!
But the catch is i dont kno how to drive a stick....lol
and i disagree when peoepl say manuals are more bcuz i have a hell of a time in my car....
but then again ive never driven a stick