4.6L V8 Technical Discussions Any questions about engine, transmission, or gearing can be asked here!

JBA vs. BBK?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 11, 2008 | 11:26 AM
  #1  
bkmagby's Avatar
bkmagby
Thread Starter
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 109
From: Houston
Default JBA vs. BBK?

Which short tube header is better? The JBA's cost more than the BBK's, but do they actually perform better? Are they better built? Are they worth the extra cost? If not, the BBK's seem like a great buy.

Also, I know that the Long tube headers make more power but I am not interested in effecting my emissions legality, not to mention the added cost. I'm only interested in the information pertaining to the short tube headers.

Thanks.
Old Feb 11, 2008 | 12:39 PM
  #2  
BFMacias's Avatar
BFMacias
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 201
Default RE: JBA vs. BBK?

A majority of people on this website are going to tell you to go Long Tube. However from my experience I have BBK long tubes and they are well made and cheaper than JBA. I hope this helps
Old Feb 11, 2008 | 01:15 PM
  #3  
OrangeGTCS's Avatar
OrangeGTCS
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 94
From: Maryland
Default RE: JBA vs. BBK?

ORIGINAL: bkmagby

Also, I know that the Long tube headers make more power but I am not interested in effecting my emissions legality
Ialso go through Emissions and this is why most Long tube manufactures sell an X/H with cats. I have the JBA with cats and it runs and sounds sweet. I wouldn't waste my time installing shorties for the little to no gains they achieve. Istalling headers on these cars are a bit tough and not fun. You're looking at about 8 hours for a one person job. Well that's what it took me with floor jacks and jackstands in my garage.
Old Feb 11, 2008 | 04:05 PM
  #4  
bkmagby's Avatar
bkmagby
Thread Starter
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 109
From: Houston
Default RE: JBA vs. BBK?

Thanks for the info guys. BFMacias, how long have you had your BBK's? Any problems with them yet?

Also, did either one of you have your car tuned after the header install?
Old Feb 11, 2008 | 07:57 PM
  #5  
BFMacias's Avatar
BFMacias
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 201
Default RE: JBA vs. BBK?

I have had My BBK's for about 8 months now with absolutely no problems. I do recommend them based simply on the price. They are very well made with a nice thick flange and they don't stick out underneath the car. I didn't have to tune my car after installation (no check engine lights) however I would recommend it.
Old Feb 11, 2008 | 08:38 PM
  #6  
Simon1's Avatar
Simon1
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,552
From: Redding, CA
Default RE: JBA vs. BBK?

The JBA's have a thicker gauge steel they use for there headers. I talk to several different suppliers and they all told me that's why they cost a little more.

I got the uncoated headers and wish I had gotten the coated. They make alot of heat in the engine bay. The coating would be great and also look nicer in the long run.
Old Feb 11, 2008 | 08:42 PM
  #7  
Simon1's Avatar
Simon1
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,552
From: Redding, CA
Default RE: JBA vs. BBK?

Keep in mind you will need motor mounts when putting in the new headers. Steeda makes some prothane mounts and there are a few others too. You might as well by them both at the same time since the mounts have to be loosened/removed during the install.

If you don't get them, you will drive around and probably have no issues until you go around a corner and hear a strange vibrating noise. That would be the header hitting the frame rail. The solution is a firmer mount that prevents movement from side to side. It doesn't make your car vibrate strangely or become annoying.
Old Feb 11, 2008 | 09:18 PM
  #8  
Bluestar's Avatar
Bluestar
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,997
From:
Default RE: JBA vs. BBK?

I have the JBA Stainless Steel Shorties ($300. E-Bay), no issues whatsoever.
Old Feb 11, 2008 | 10:53 PM
  #9  
BFMacias's Avatar
BFMacias
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 201
Default RE: JBA vs. BBK?

I did not have to buy new motor mounts. That might be JBA specifc.
Old Feb 12, 2008 | 04:45 AM
  #10  
kcmarti's Avatar
kcmarti
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 300
From: Fredericksburg, Virginia
Default RE: JBA vs. BBK?

First, you do not need new motor mount for JBA shorties. Second, thosewho say there is little or no benefit from all shorties, do not know what they are talking about.While itis true that LTssupport, and will achieve,higher HP, it is in the upper RPM range and at the cost of low end torque. I did extensive research on the shorties before deciding on the 1 1/2" JBA ceramic coated header, shorties from BBK, MAC and Hooker. The BBK and MAC, while better than the stock manifold have unequal length tubes. The JBA and Hooker shorties are made with equal length tubes which greatly aid in exhaust scavenging. The Hooker's in particular, and the JBA's as well,are designed to improve low end torque and HP. Both are capable of supporting mid to upper 400 HP applications. I eventually choose the JBA shorties for two reasons, (1) they came with1 1/2" tubes (which enhance even further, their low end torque production), and (2) they were available with the (more expensive) silver ceramic coating, which I could not get from the Hookers). Installwas relatively easy -I did mine by myself, in the driveway,with only ramps anda hydraulic floorjack - took me about 6 hours and 4 beers.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:15 AM.