5.0 vs 5.8
#23
RE: 5.0 vs 5.8
Here is my 5.8 carbed install. And the headers needed to make it work. They are Headman Husslers that I sent to Jet Hot. 1 &7/8 inch long tube with "Flat" 3 inch slip on collectors.
[IMG]local://upfiles/20131/6BB2E5AD76F64A4CB29AE67045C202A9.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]local://upfiles/20131/0165CCDBBEE643A3AD2C79A49D316C53.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]local://upfiles/20131/6BB2E5AD76F64A4CB29AE67045C202A9.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]local://upfiles/20131/0165CCDBBEE643A3AD2C79A49D316C53.jpg[/IMG]
#25
RE: 5.0 vs 5.8
You can get then for the 302/5.0 also. It allows you to run a big primary tube and maintain ground clearance for the street. The primary tubes on these headers are 1/8th inch smaller than a 2 inch pipe so they align them all in a row instead of stacking them two on top and two on bottom to help keep them off the road. These are a very long header too. The collector fastens to my exhaust right in the center of the tranny cross member. The have very heavy flanges and are a real nice piece. I must say, four years of street driving and the jet hot still looks like brand new.
[IMG]local://upfiles/20131/C5A54A8ECBE74B50B860448E82349118.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]local://upfiles/20131/C5A54A8ECBE74B50B860448E82349118.jpg[/IMG]
#27
RE: 5.0 vs 5.8
wow very nice looking there. well carb just maybe the ticket then i really don't know right now. i like the fact that you can fine tune a efi more then you can a carb. but i may just stick with a stright carb setup. i have a long time to think of this and the hard part right now is getting the engine and money for all this lined up
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Matt's 95 Stang
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
2
10-05-2015 07:16 AM
mungodrums
S550 2015-2023 Mustang
10
09-28-2015 10:54 PM
treesloth
New Member Area
4
09-28-2015 07:03 AM