MAC vs. FLOWMASTER
2nd Gear Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 365
From:
RE: MAC vs. FLOWMASTER
ORIGINAL: V6MustangKnight
so then exhaust isn't really for performance? people tell me that u can get some hp from a magnaflow...so is that wrong?
so then exhaust isn't really for performance? people tell me that u can get some hp from a magnaflow...so is that wrong?
6th Gear Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 15,042
From: Hamilton, NJ
RE: MAC vs. FLOWMASTER
They are but they are played out for a reason.... I TOTALLY understand what you are saying about everyone and their grandmother having flowmasters on their mustang but they all have them for a reason....
What do you have pro?
What do you have pro?
2nd Gear Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 365
From:
RE: MAC vs. FLOWMASTER
well magnaflow claims to have the best performance exhaust, they sound decent I just don't like the popping noise when coming off the throttle, but, Idk I guess it's your opinion... more performance or more sound
6th Gear Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 15,042
From: Hamilton, NJ
RE: MAC vs. FLOWMASTER
I would definetly buy them also if I could afford them. I already have the american thunders from my 88 so I think Im going to use them until I get find a nice cheap used set of SLP's... the flows will have to do for now.
The Rogue Mod
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 21,918
From: Maryland Sucka's!!
RE: MAC vs. FLOWMASTER
ORIGINAL: 88BlueGT
They are but they are played out for a reason.... I TOTALLY understand what you are saying about everyone and their grandmother having flowmasters on their mustang but they all have them for a reason....
What do you have pro?
They are but they are played out for a reason.... I TOTALLY understand what you are saying about everyone and their grandmother having flowmasters on their mustang but they all have them for a reason....
What do you have pro?
