One step closer to solving the Procharger problem...
#31
RE: One step closer to solving the Procharger problem...
I'm not going to be able to make any changes to the tune, etc until i get my fuel pressure regulator installed. It should be here tomorrow. My stock one is shot..ruptured diaphram. So that means the car just sits in the driveway until tomorrow, lol. Then I have to dial in the pressure, raise my WOT breakpoint to 4.0v to keep it in closed loop longer, datalog some Closed Loop drives around town, and then analyze and modify my MAF transfer to make sure everything is still okay.
#32
RE: One step closer to solving the Procharger problem...
good tactic,
ill presume you will change that back to 2.0, and the TPS to 1.250 idle, and pressure to 45-50? pounds per square inch, when your done.
Have you changed to wideband OS sensors or at least new ones for optimal performance? I think your gonna make some good numbers with this setup
ill presume you will change that back to 2.0, and the TPS to 1.250 idle, and pressure to 45-50? pounds per square inch, when your done.
Have you changed to wideband OS sensors or at least new ones for optimal performance? I think your gonna make some good numbers with this setup
#33
RE: One step closer to solving the Procharger problem...
Both O2 sensors were replaced last year and they're in fine working order. I'm going to buy a wideband setup within the next few weeks so I can dial in the tune a bit tighter. I usually use one at my friend's dyno but it sucks when I am home and just want to do a quick test. I'd rather have something that I own and that I can use anytime I want.
I'll temporarily crank the voltage just to keep in it CL just a bit longer. That way I can hit as many points as possible on my MAF curve while still in closed loop. After I tweak those settings, I'll move on to the open loop / WOT settings with the wideband.
I'll temporarily crank the voltage just to keep in it CL just a bit longer. That way I can hit as many points as possible on my MAF curve while still in closed loop. After I tweak those settings, I'll move on to the open loop / WOT settings with the wideband.
#34
RE: One step closer to solving the Procharger problem...
ORIGINAL: aode06
set it to 1.250 idle and 2.8 wot breakpoint, youll love that setting alot better , and performance will increase substancially.
thats where you belong
set it to 1.250 idle and 2.8 wot breakpoint, youll love that setting alot better , and performance will increase substancially.
thats where you belong
#35
RE: One step closer to solving the Procharger problem...
ORIGINAL: 5.0stanger
what is that? I know the base setting at idle of .98 but I have never heard of any other settings. Why would you run somethinf different?
ORIGINAL: aode06
set it to 1.250 idle and 2.8 wot breakpoint, youll love that setting alot better , and performance will increase substancially.
thats where you belong
set it to 1.250 idle and 2.8 wot breakpoint, youll love that setting alot better , and performance will increase substancially.
thats where you belong
those are the specs his computer needs to be at. A hci is different, when you supercharge, your on a whole different ramp.
#36
RE: One step closer to solving the Procharger problem...
ORIGINAL: 5.0stanger
what is that? I know the base setting at idle of .98 but I have never heard of any other settings. Why would you run somethinf different?
ORIGINAL: aode06
set it to 1.250 idle and 2.8 wot breakpoint, youll love that setting alot better , and performance will increase substancially.
thats where you belong
set it to 1.250 idle and 2.8 wot breakpoint, youll love that setting alot better , and performance will increase substancially.
thats where you belong
With forced induction, the RPMs start to climb REAL fast when you floor it. You will usually want the switch to happen pretty damned fast as well so you don't run into any problems. So by lowering the voltage, you are telling the computer to switch to WOT mode a split second before you actually cross the threshhold and open the throttle all the way.
#37
RE: One step closer to solving the Procharger problem...
ORIGINAL: PRO50SC
Sam, does Anderson offer a power pipe set up for your application. You def have the right idea. My blower sits just as close to the fenderwell as yours does and the clearance on mine is very limited as well. I got rid of the crappy accordian style intake hose my kit came w/ and bought a power pipe. I had to cut some of the fenderwell out for it to fit but the set up is much better.
Sam, does Anderson offer a power pipe set up for your application. You def have the right idea. My blower sits just as close to the fenderwell as yours does and the clearance on mine is very limited as well. I got rid of the crappy accordian style intake hose my kit came w/ and bought a power pipe. I had to cut some of the fenderwell out for it to fit but the set up is much better.
Looking at your setup, if we took away that little extra gap then you'd have clearance troubles too. i guess that means that there's officially no way to squeeze it in there. (I checked out the other options we talked about awhile back too...same issue and this is why.)
I just thought of it again because I'm in the process of finding a way to make a nice custom box. Then all I have to do is cut away at the inner fender. It's sitll better than nothing I suppose.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Matt's 95 Stang
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
2
10-05-2015 07:16 AM
MustangForums Editor
General Tech
0
09-25-2015 06:58 PM