BBK SSI vs RPM II intake? - Page 2 - MustangForums.com


5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

Reply
 
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-15-2005, 03:43 PM   #11  
link1235jeff
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location:
Posts: 365
Default RE: BBK SSI vs RPM II intake?

here is a site that installed the bbk intake and dtested it out http://mustang50magazine.com/techart...8_0412_intake/
link1235jeff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2005, 12:30 AM   #12  
91GTFox111
I ♥ Acer
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Da Ghetto son
Posts: 109
Default RE: BBK SSI vs RPM II intake?

I would try the BBk sounds like a deal
91GTFox111 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2005, 02:23 AM   #13  
mrsneakyz28
1st Gear Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location:
Posts: 134
Default RE: BBK SSI vs RPM II intake?

Quote:
ORIGINAL: Bkizzle

Yeah i was wondering what intake would suit my ccar the best, i dont mind price, i have a 94 5.0, and im looking to work on the engine area, right now its basicalyl stock except for the headers which are shorties.... would the bbk be good for my car
The bbk is the ideal intake to go with anyway especially if you don't care about the price. Although it is a better deal becuase it comes with other stuff. But don't expect to gain 35 horses like they claim you can, because thats really only if you have head and cam to compliment it. You would still probably see a solid 15rwhp gain though, which is nice. Then if you do plan to add headsx and cam then you would get even more power out of it, so yah definetaly worth it.
mrsneakyz28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2005, 05:14 AM   #14  
nemethjames1
4th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 1,665
Default RE: BBK SSI vs RPM II intake?

bbk is a bit much on the wallet, but its exotic looking and comes with fuel rails if i had the money i would get bbk
nemethjames1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2005, 08:19 AM   #15  
mustang_mike_2003
1st Gear Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 70
Default RE: BBK SSI vs RPM II intake?

Im a fan of BBK. But make sure that who ever you decide to buy from throws in the thermal gasket that gose between the upper and lower intake. It keeps the upper intake cooler by stoping heat sink from the lower intake. the'll know what it is. Also if your going to spend this kind of cash on an intake guys, make sure you like it's looks. I wouldnt buy a intake inless it had a really nice crome finish. makes the engine bay look waaay better
mustang_mike_2003 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to get good HP out of a 4.6 without spending big bucks. Luke9222 4.6L General Discussion 19 10-22-2015 11:55 PM
New 5.0 carb build bogs at hit of throttle Daddys Girls GTs 5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang 3 09-14-2015 08:46 PM
High idle after cleaning Imrc Scottyboy187 SVT Forums 1 09-13-2015 10:23 PM
I've got MBRP race cat-back and MMR air intake and the car goes like crap...!! panic 5.0L GT S550 Tech 5 09-10-2015 05:56 PM
New member and just bought my first mustang Luke9222 New Member Area 7 09-04-2015 06:46 AM


Tags
bbk, edelbrock, edlebrock, gt40, ii, intake, ll, perfomer, performer, rpm, sale, ssi, trickflow, upper, vs

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump

Advertising
Featured Sponsors
Vendor Directory

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:44 PM.


© 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.