5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

Long Rod 302

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 14, 2009 | 07:15 PM
  #1  
holyshift's Avatar
holyshift
Thread Starter
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 893
From: Sandusky,OH
Default Long Rod 302

Alright talked to a buddy of mine,and he mentioned something about a motor that hes heard of people building called a long rod 302. I guess these guys are using a chevy rod with a Ford 302/306 piston and making good power....anyone ever heard of this?? And if you have got any info on em?
Old Aug 14, 2009 | 07:25 PM
  #2  
sn95_331_GT_ yellow's Avatar
sn95_331_GT_ yellow
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,394
From: CT
Default

302 stroke crank with a 5.400" rod. its NOT a chevy rod. you need to get the correct pistons as the pin is set higher in the piston to offset the longer rod.

the theory is that the piston dwells at TDC and BDC longer.

while i dont know about that, i know that it give you a much more favorable rod/stroke ratio.

Last edited by sn95_331_GT_ yellow; Aug 14, 2009 at 07:26 PM. Reason: typo
Old Aug 14, 2009 | 08:22 PM
  #3  
mjr46's Avatar
mjr46
D.R. THE PATHETIC DORK
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 30,869
From: West Virginia
Default

just run a stroker motor
Old Aug 14, 2009 | 08:43 PM
  #4  
67mustang302's Avatar
67mustang302
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 10,468
From: California
Default

5.7" SBC rod with a 1" c/h SBC stroker piston. The piston slows down at TDC and speeds up at BDC, a bit more dwell up top can reduce timing requirements and give a bit of extra detonation resistance, but the biggest advantage is the much shorter compression height of the piston means a much reduced weight. That's the setup I'm running and the pistons I'm running from Mahle are only 383 grams, with a small 112 gram wrist pin. You need to run a 2.100" conrod journal on the crank and machine the big end of the rods to the correct width.
Old Aug 15, 2009 | 01:20 AM
  #5  
luckythirteen13's Avatar
luckythirteen13
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 9,092
From: las vegas, nv
Default

Originally Posted by mjr46
just run a stroker motor
+1, rather have the extra cubes
Old Apr 17, 2010 | 12:50 AM
  #6  
Z-Dreamer's Avatar
Z-Dreamer
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 3
From: Kalifornia
Default

Originally Posted by 67mustang302
5.7" SBC rod with a 1" c/h SBC stroker piston. The piston slows down at TDC and speeds up at BDC, a bit more dwell up top can reduce timing requirements and give a bit of extra detonation resistance, but the biggest advantage is the much shorter compression height of the piston means a much reduced weight. That's the setup I'm running and the pistons I'm running from Mahle are only 383 grams, with a small 112 gram wrist pin. You need to run a 2.100" conrod journal on the crank and machine the big end of the rods to the correct width.

I would appreciate if you would tell me more about your engine combination.

I am interested in building a long rod 302 for my 72 Datsun 240Z.

Mark
Old Apr 17, 2010 | 09:55 AM
  #7  
TrimDrip's Avatar
TrimDrip
FudgeDrip
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,288
From: S. Cal.
Default

i am interested in knowing how much of a power adder can be ran with that thin of a piston
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Galactic
Archive - Mustangs For Sale
10
Apr 29, 2019 02:56 PM
guitarman376
Classic Mustangs (Tech)
6
Oct 11, 2015 01:47 AM
treesloth
New Member Area
4
Sep 28, 2015 07:03 AM
gagemcc
V6 (1994-2004) Mustangs
1
Sep 22, 2015 09:43 AM
jaiidutch
Motor Swap Section
2
Sep 14, 2015 10:29 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:32 PM.