5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

85 non roller motor 30 over build, looking for ideas

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-20-2009, 08:34 PM
  #11  
mjr46
D.R. THE PATHETIC DORK
 
mjr46's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 30,863
Default

just did a 351 in a bronco a few weeks back and the heads were bad and side by side they were the same as the e7 heads....except for the head bolt holes, now of course i'm refering to latemodel 351 stuff
mjr46 is offline  
Old 08-21-2009, 02:32 AM
  #12  
86GT 93LX
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
86GT 93LX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,424
Default

Originally Posted by mjr46
just did a 351 in a bronco a few weeks back and the heads were bad and side by side they were the same as the e7 heads....except for the head bolt holes, now of course i'm refering to latemodel 351 stuff
ive heard of people using ones i think from the 80s and they said they have bigger valves and chambers...and also that they didnt seem to have any gain, if not a loss.what brand of carb do you recommend? 650? what brand is the most reliable. ive heard bad stuff about all of the big names. heard holley is complete crap, but i dont know first hand.whats the best off the self intake to go with said carb?i like my equal length macs but im thinkn long tubes if i build a differant car and i need to adress the temporary 5 (t5) reliability. how do carbed 302s respond to a turbo? i have all the crane cams ignition to help out with forced induction. i wouldnt do it to this motor, maybe with forged pistons
86GT 93LX is offline  
Old 08-21-2009, 07:04 AM
  #13  
mjr46
D.R. THE PATHETIC DORK
 
mjr46's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 30,863
Default

carbs and turbos are fine, but a blow through carb and hat must be used, as for holley's being junk...only to those who don't know how to tune them they are.....edlebrocks are for those people.....
mjr46 is offline  
Old 08-21-2009, 11:28 PM
  #14  
86GT 93LX
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
86GT 93LX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,424
Default

So how's that a good carb? I mean messing with it all the time? I just don't want a carb that won't stay tuned correctly.
86GT 93LX is offline  
Old 08-22-2009, 12:32 AM
  #15  
mjr46
D.R. THE PATHETIC DORK
 
mjr46's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 30,863
Default

it stays tuned fine, you just have to understand where to address the tune and on what circuit based on the issues/probs you are experiencing, tune a carb is all in the individual such as properly setting the idle, setting timing, tuning the primaries and secondaries and the accelerator pump circuit, and or picking the proper power valve, Based on my experience I have found edelbrocks to be a decent bolt on carb with minimal tuning involved on mild motors, but in the same respect the holleys have always delivered better throttle response and just seem to be more responsive then the CARTER AFB design/edelbrock...infact on my 92 i RUN A EDELBROCK 1405
mjr46 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Granatelli Sales
S550 2015-2023 Mustang
22
01-20-2020 12:34 AM
Luke9222
4.6L General Discussion
19
10-22-2015 11:55 PM



Quick Reply: 85 non roller motor 30 over build, looking for ideas



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:17 PM.